80 likes | 94 Views
This strategic partnership program aims to provide data science skills in big data interpretation to future professionals in personal assessment. The program encourages networking, non-academic stakeholder contribution, and offers master modules on advanced technology, judgmental bias, fairness, discrimination, and the challenges and opportunities of big data-driven selection processes in the public sector. Collaboration between human and machine, legal considerations, and enrichment of information are explored.
E N D
Big Data in Psychological Assessment An Erasmus + Strategic Partnership Programme Stéphane Vanderveken, Deputy Head of Unit, Unit Assessment centre, EPSO
Partners • Academic • Delft University of Technology (NL) • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL) • SaarlandUniversity (DE) • Non-Academic • Owiwi (EL) • Precire (DE) • Test Central (RO) • Associated • EPSO • GITP (NL)
Context • Data science in selection and recruitment: helping or challengingpsychology? • Machine learning in personalassessment: helping or challenginghumanassessors?
Purpose Provide data science skills and competencies (use and interpretation of big data) to future professionals in the field of personal assessment
3 objectives • Catalyze organizational networking on the topic • Encourage contribution of non academic stakeholders in education • Develop and provide Master modules
5 outputs (for future professionals) • 21st Century employees • Advanced technology for psychological assessment • Judgmental bias, fairness and discrimination • Skills training cluster • The assessor versus the algorithm
Challenges for the Public Sector selection and recruitment • Big Data driven selection process unavoidable • Need for new type of technologies and expertise • Legal aspects to be considered • Prepare collaboration between human and machine
Opportunities for the Public Sector selection and recruitment • Big data = enrichment of information • Alternative/complementarity to classical testing (reasoning) • Enhanced capacity to manage massive number of applications • From a « bias free » to a «controlled bias » approach?