1 / 27

Robert Foot, CoEPP , University of Melbourne June 26 2014

Explaining galactic structure and direct detection experiments with mirror dark matter. Robert Foot, CoEPP , University of Melbourne June 26 2014. For further details see review:. See this review for detailed references to the literature. Evidence for non-baryonic dark matter.

artie
Download Presentation

Robert Foot, CoEPP , University of Melbourne June 26 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Explaining galactic structure and direct detection experiments with mirror dark matter Robert Foot, CoEPP, University of Melbourne • June 26 2014

  2. For further details see review: See this review for detailed references to the literature

  3. Evidence for non-baryonic dark matter Rotation curves in spiral galaxies: E.g. NGC3198 Lambda-CDM Model Suggests 23% of the Universe consists of non-baryonic dark matter

  4. What is dark matter? Dark matter might arise from a ‘hidden sector’: Such a theory generally has accidental U(1) symmetries leading to massive stable fermions. Such a theory is also very poorly constrained by experiments. An interesting special case is where is ‘isomorphic’ to the standard model: There is a symmetry swapping each ordinary particle with its mirror partner. If we swap left and right chiral fields then this symmetry can be interpreted as space-time parity:

  5. Mirror dark matter with kinetic mixing Mirror dark matter has a rich structure: it is multi-component, self interacting and dissipative. Importantly there are no free parameters describing masses and self interactions of the mirror particles! Exact symmetry implies: me’ = me , mp’ = mp , mg’ = mg= 0 etc and all cross-sections of mirror particle self-interactions the same as for ordinary particles. Also, ordinary and dark matter almost decoupled from each other. Only gravity and photon-mirror photon kinetic mixing important for dark matter. Kinetic mixing is theoretically free parameter, preserves all symmetries of the theory, and is renormalizable.

  6. Kinetic Mixing The physical effect of kinetic mixing is to induce tiny ordinary electric charges for mirror particles. This means that they can couple to ordinary photons: Important for cosmology, supernova’s, Galactic structure, if Important for direct detection experiments, such as DAMA, CoGeNT etc if

  7. Early Universe cosmology Consistent early Universe cosmology requires suitable initial conditions. In addition to standard adiabatic (almost) scale invariant density perturbations, need: (1) BBN/CMB (2)CMB But kinetic mixing interaction can produce entropy in mirror sector leading to non-negligible T’/T : This means that at early times, mirror hydrogen was ionized. Mirror particles undergo acoustic oscillations prior to mirror hydrogen recombination. Can suppress small scale structure if

  8. Implications of kinetic mixing for matter power spectrum x= 0 equivalent to standard cold dark matter model x= 0.7 x= 0.3 x= 0.5

  9. Implications of kinetic mixing for CMB x= 0 equivalent to standard cold dark matter model x= 0.5 x = 0.7 Current observations limit x = T'/T < 0.3-0.4.

  10. Galaxy structure Mirror dark matter is collisional and dissipative. Mirror particle halos of galaxies are composed of a plasma containing: e’, H’, He’, O’, Fe’ …. This plasma can be modelled as a fluid, described by the Euler equations: Halo heating supplied by Supernova generated g’ Cooling due (mainly) to bremsstrahlung.

  11. Spiral galaxies today If system evolves to a static configuration then v=0 everywhere. If this happens the equations reduce to two relatively simple equations, if spherical symmetry assumed: Hydrostatic equilibrium Energy balance equation: Heating=cooling That is, we have two equations for two unknowns, the dark matter r(r), T(r) distributions. Before we can solve these equations, need to identify the heat source.

  12. Ordinary Supernova can supply required heat for the Halo Supernova core temperature ~ 30 MeV. In standard theory, core collapse energy (~310 53 ergs) is released in neutrinos. If mirror sector exists with kinetic mixing: , then~1/2 of the core collapse energy will instead be released into light mirror particles: e-’, e+’, g’. In the region around the supernova, this energy is ultimately converted into mirror photons. Detailed energy spectrum is difficult to predict. If a substantial fraction of these photons (> ~ 10%) have energy less than ~30 keV, then they can provide a substantial heat source ~1043 erg/s (for MW galaxy).

  13. Dynamical halo model Governed by a) heating b) cooling c) hydrostatic equilibrium These two equations can be used to work out T(r) and r(r), given a known baryonic matter distribution and supernova rate Supernova rate Approximate Eout with thermal bremsstrahlung rate

  14. Spiral galaxies today Numerically solve the equations for a `generic’ spiral galaxy of stellar mass mD , disk scale length rD . Find that dark matter parameterized via: gives solution to the hydrostatic equilibrium equilibrium and energy balance equation, iff:

  15. Constant halo surface density first discussed by Kormendy and Freeman – 2004 and further studied by Donato et al.

  16. Spiral galaxies today – derived temperature profile

  17. Spiral galaxies today derived rotation curves rtotal= rbaryons + rdark matter

  18. Spiral galaxies today – Tully Fisher relation Data: Webster et al, 2008

  19. Spiral galaxies today Derived mirror dark matter density profile: Putting in epsilon dependence in last equation:

  20. Mirror dark matter – direct detection Rate depends on cross-section and halo distribution: Halo distribution is Maxwellian with The bottom line:

  21. Mirror dark matter – direct detection Mirror dark matter has 3 key features: It is multi-component and light: H’, He’, O’, Fe’,… Interacts via Rutherford scattering. Halo velocity dispersion can be very narrow. Mirror metal nuclei have masses and thus This might help explain why higher threshold experiments do not see a signal. Mean mass of particles in halo Galactic rotation velocity

  22. Mirror dark matter – direct detection

  23. Mirror dark matter – direct detection

  24. Mirror dark matter – direct detection

  25. Mirror dark matter – direct detection

  26. Conclusions Evidence for non-baryonic dark matter from rotation curves in galaxies, and precision cosmology. Dissipative dark matter candidates are possible. Mirror dark matter presents as a well motivated predictive example. Such dark matter can explain the large scale structure of the Universe, and recent work has found that it might also explain small scale structure as well. The DAMA experiment may have actually detected galactic dark matter! Support from CoGeNT, CRESST-II and CDMS/Si ! Some tension with LUX and the low threshold superCDMS search.

More Related