150 likes | 311 Views
Economic and Social Outlook Conference Bill Daniels Executive Director, Independent Schools Council of Australia (ISCA). University of Melbourne 30 June 2011. Enrolment share by sector 1970 to 2010. Enrolment change by sector 1985 - 2010. Source: ABS Schools Australia data.
E N D
Economic and Social Outlook Conference Bill DanielsExecutive Director,Independent Schools Council of Australia (ISCA) University of Melbourne 30 June 2011
Enrolment change by sector 1985 - 2010 Source: ABS Schools Australia data
Secondary enrolment share by capital city Source: ABS Population Census 2006
Family income and school choice Source: ABS Census of Population and Housing 2006
Sector diversity Note: Figures include independent Catholic schools and enrolments
Schools recurrent funding by sector 2008-09 Source: Productivity Commission & Financial Questionnaire
Average NRIPS, Government income and private income per student – average school amount Source: ACARA Financial Data – February 2011 Excludes: 28 independent schools with data pending and government schools with zero enrolments or no AG recurrent income . includes some updated independent sector data for NSW, WA and ACT
Net recurrent income per student by sector Source: ACARA Financial Data – February 2011
Sliding scale of funding entitlement per student according to SES score (initial 2011 amounts)
Independent schools by SES score 2010 74% of schools have an SES ≤107 Note: SES 85 includes special schools and special assistance schools
Non-systemic school funding sources and non-systemic enrolments by school SES score 2006 Source: ANAO analysis of Non-government Schools Financial Questionnaire data & DEEWR Census
Projected enrolment change in all schools 2010 - 2020 Source: DEEWR Projections and ABS Schools Australia *Based on average school size by sector for 2010 derived from ABS data.
What currently works well • Demand & Supply – finely balanced • Choice & diversity options • Funding stability and predictability • Encourages private investment • Autonomy and community involvement • Responsiveness & outcomes meet parental expectations • Parents consider they receive value for money • Affordable for government • Frees funds for other Government priorities