550 likes | 792 Views
7/28/09. OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting. 2. Objective. Outline a risk-based underwriting framework to address risks of NSP projects. . 7/28/09. OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting. 3. Agenda. Why underwrite NSP?Cost principlesRisk framework for underwritingUnderwriting homebuyer projectsUnderwriting rental projectsUnderwriting land banking projectsWrap-up.
E N D
1. Underwriting NSP Projects Monte Franke, Franke Consulting
Ohio Dept of Development
Ohio Conference of Community Development
2. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 2 Objective Outline a risk-based underwriting framework to address risks of NSP projects
3. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 3 Agenda Why underwrite NSP?
Cost principles
Risk framework for underwriting
Underwriting homebuyer projects
Underwriting rental projects
Underwriting land banking projects
Wrap-up
4. Why Underwrite NSP?
5. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 5 Why Underwrite NSP? Rare opportunity to expand affordable stock
But with distressed stock and neighborhoods
Projects must be “ready”
Stimulus deadlines & need for quick impact
But in the rush to fund, haste can make….
Cost principles apply to NSP
The OIG is watching
“Longest feasible term” standard A hasty man drinks his tea with a fork.A hasty man drinks his tea with a fork.
6. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 6 NSP/CDBG Underwriting? Only explicit reference in CDBG rule: economic development activities (570.209)
But OMB cost principles apply to CDBG & NSP
Allowable public assistance based on OMB cost principles & program standards
7. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 7 CDBG ED Underwriting Principles Project costs are reasonable
All sources of project financing are committed
CDBG funds are not substituted for non-Federal financial support
Project is financially feasible
Return on the owner’s equity investment will not be unreasonably high
Funds are disbursed on a pro rata basis with other finances provided to the project.
8. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 8 Application of Cost Principles CDBG rule link to principles
570.200(a)(5) & .502(a): A-87 public & A-122 nonprofit subrecipients
A-87 relocated to 2 CFR Part 225
A-122 relocated to 2 CFR Part 230
85:22: 48 CFR Part 31: for-profits & non-subrecipients
9. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 9 NSP Requirements Affecting Underwriting Costs
Purchase discount requirement & appraisal standards
Reasonable developer fees (non-subrecipients)
Davis-Bacon
Property standards
Codes
Rehab standards
LBP for pre-1978 properties
10. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 10 NSP Requirements Affecting Underwriting Initial & continued affordability:
“Maximum extent practicable” & “for longest feasible term”
Prices, continued affordability & enforcement
HOME as “minimal” safe harbor
Relocation
Current occupant eligibility, budgeting relocation costs
11. Cost Principles
12. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 12 Purpose of Cost Principles Objectives:
Provide guidelines to organizations concerning reimbursement requirements
Provide uniform standards of allowability
Provide uniform standards of allocation
But Cost Principles do not:
Supersede limitations imposed by statute
Dictate how a government should use funds
Relieve state/local governments of stewardship responsibilities for Federal $
13. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 13 Allowability of Costs Costs are allowable if:
Reasonable
Allocable to the program
Treated consistently (GAAP & agency procedures)
Allowed by regulations (program & Circulars) and by terms of written agreement
Documentable
14. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 14 Reasonableness of Costs Ordinary & necessary
Is it necessary for the completion of the project?
Arm’s length transaction
Is it treated as a transaction with an unrelated third party?
Due prudence
Would a prudent person incur the cost?
Consistent with established policies/practices
Is it treated consistently across agency/ program?
15. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 15 Allocability of Costs Allocable to a Federal program when:
Incurred directly for the purposes of the program
If costs benefit multiple activities, reasonable allocation method
Indirect costs necessary to the overall operation of the agency
Equipment items budgeted and benefiting the project may be charged entirely to project regardless of its useful life
16. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 16 Unallowable Cost Specifically identified in the grant/contract as being unallowable
Eligible/ineligible in the Notice
Eligible/ineligible under CDBG
Specifically identified in Circular as being unallowable
Does not meet the “allowability” criteria in the Circular On the other hand, a cost is considered unallowable to be paid with Federal program funds if is it specifically mentioned as unallowable in program regulations or program agreements. In the case of HOME, the ineligible costs are listed in 92.214, but costs must also be consistent with what is described as eligible in 92.206.
In addition, a cost is considered unallowable to be paid with Federal funds if it does not meet the standards for allowability listed on the previous slide, or if it is specifically listed as unallowable in the Circular. Some of the key unallowable costs are listed on this slide, and include: Alcoholic Beverages, Bad Debts, Contingency provisions, Fines and Penalties, Lobbying Costs, Fund Raising Costs, Entertainment, Social Memberships, Fundraising Costs, and Interest on borrowed capital. For other unallowable costs, see Attachment B of the Circular.On the other hand, a cost is considered unallowable to be paid with Federal program funds if is it specifically mentioned as unallowable in program regulations or program agreements. In the case of HOME, the ineligible costs are listed in 92.214, but costs must also be consistent with what is described as eligible in 92.206.
In addition, a cost is considered unallowable to be paid with Federal funds if it does not meet the standards for allowability listed on the previous slide, or if it is specifically listed as unallowable in the Circular. Some of the key unallowable costs are listed on this slide, and include: Alcoholic Beverages, Bad Debts, Contingency provisions, Fines and Penalties, Lobbying Costs, Fund Raising Costs, Entertainment, Social Memberships, Fundraising Costs, and Interest on borrowed capital. For other unallowable costs, see Attachment B of the Circular.
17. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 17 Sample Unallowable Costs Alcoholic Beverages
Bad Debts
Contingency provisions
Fines and Penalties
Lobbying Costs Fund Raising Costs
Entertainment
Social Memberships
Fundraising Costs
Interest on borrowed capital
18. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 18 Pre-Award Costs Costs incurred prior to the effective date of the award must be directly related to the award and allowable:
Only to extent allowable if incurred after the effective date of the award
Only with the approval of awarding agency
Not a “choice limiting” action pre-environmental clearance
See 24 CFR 58.22 & CPD-01-11, p. 10 There are also limitations on costs that can be incurred prior to award and still reimbursed from Federal program funds. The cost must be directly related to the performance of the activity under the award, and is allowable only to the extent the cost would have been allowable if occurring after the award. Also, the cost must be approved by the funding agency, and must not be for an action that would be considered “choice limiting” prior to environmental review (see 24 CFR 58.22 and CPD-01-11 page 10.)There are also limitations on costs that can be incurred prior to award and still reimbursed from Federal program funds. The cost must be directly related to the performance of the activity under the award, and is allowable only to the extent the cost would have been allowable if occurring after the award. Also, the cost must be approved by the funding agency, and must not be for an action that would be considered “choice limiting” prior to environmental review (see 24 CFR 58.22 and CPD-01-11 page 10.)
19. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 19 No Cost Shifting or Supplanting Supplanting: deliberately reducing State or local funds because of the existence of Federal funds
Cost shifting: moving costs to/from other agreements or projects to relieve deficits, avoid restrictions imposed by law or agreement, or other reasons of convenience Other important OMB cost principles are that:
Federal funding not replace or supplant local funding, and
Costs not be shifted to or from other activities or agreements not integral to the funded activityOther important OMB cost principles are that:
Federal funding not replace or supplant local funding, and
Costs not be shifted to or from other activities or agreements not integral to the funded activity
20. Risk Framework for Underwriting
21. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 21 What is Risk Underwriting? Analyzing risks of a project & likelihood of success
Why risks? Because probability of projected outcomes
Risk assessment/underwriting includes:
Determining project facts
Making reasonable assumptions
Estimating risks
Making recommendations to minimize/mitigate risks
22. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 22 How Underwriting Fits In Project selection & funding process
Threshold eligibility
Priorities
Underwriting/risk assessment
Investment decision: underwriting informs decision
Due diligence/final underwriting
Closing
Monitoring
23. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 23 Public v. Conventional Conventional underwriting:
market risk
project risk
borrower risk
portfolio risk
Public underwriting adds:
public purpose
regulatory compliance
affordability
gap analysis
layering analysis
24. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 24 Layering of Risk Layering: interaction of many small risk factors
Multiple small problems tend to be deceptive (appear to be insignificant) & may overwhelm borrower
Pay attention to market & borrower risks as well as project risks, and consider interaction of risk factors
25. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 25 Public Underwriting Principles Invest only what is necessary to make project feasible, affordable, & viable
Contain costs but don’t cut essential investments
Keep fees/profits reasonable
Optimize private debt/other funds
Determine appropriate amount of assistance for affordability period
Fiduciary responsibility to protect public investment -- public funds put to private use
Ensure public purpose - statutory intent/public good
Invest, monitor, recapture
26. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 26 Reasonable Fees/Profit Methods to establish reasonable fee
Competition/procurement
% cap on fees
Beware fixed % as biases larger projects
Fixed $ fees – performance based fixed payments for services
27. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 27 NSP Requirements & Risk Framework Market risk: targeting AGNs
Borrower risk: developer timely implementation; buyer affordability
Project risk: readiness; sustainability
Portfolio risk: concentration to achieve impact
28. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 28 Suggested NSP Underwriting Principles Costs are reasonable, necessary, allocable, documentable
Fees/profit are reasonable
All sources are identified & committed
NSP assistance amount is appropriate (given all public sources) to achieve affordability
29. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 29 Suggested Principles, cont. Project is ready to proceed within program deadlines
Project is feasible & sustainable for affordability period
Concentration of investments will help stabilize target area
Investment terms protect the public investment for the affordability period
30. Underwriting NSP Homebuyer Projects
31. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 31 Market Issues Wider range of eligible buyers (up to 120% AMI)
Define minimum income required for affordability
But stricter mortgage underwriting narrows the pool
Areas of Greatest Need
Selected based on stress characteristics
But what is the long-term prospect for stability?
32. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 32 Market, cont. Market impact of NSP activities
Discount requirement: impact of NSP volume on values
Impact of sales price not exceeding cost
Long-term value/marketability
Concentration of investment to overcome neg. factors
How long will the buyer be upside down?
Transportation/access
33. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 33 Borrower Issues: Developer Experience
Marketing
Buyer intake & pipeline
Active buyer pool?
Affirmatively further fair housing (affirmative marketing?)
Counseling: 8 hour minimum
Lender relationships/mortgage programs
34. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 34 Borrower Issues: Homebuyers Affordability
Action Plan amendment definition
Mortgage standards
Lender participation
Lender underwriting metrics: min. credit scores (impact of reduced credit lines), front & back ratios, LTV limit
Getting to 50% AMI with homeownership?
35. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 35 Project Issues Completion issues
Commitment & expenditure deadlines
Timely AGN implementation for impact
Feasibility issues
Costs v. value; pricing
Improvements: codes, rehab standards
Marketing/sales process
36. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 36 Sustainable Homeownership The downpayment – what’s their stake?
Sensible mortgages: avoid ARMs & high ratios
Post-closing cash
Energy efficiency – adding U to PITI
Structure/systems useful life – adding M to PITI
Post-closing counseling/relationship
Resubordination policy
37. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 37 Structuring NSP Assistance Amount of assistance
Developer assistance: Will it all pass thru to buyers?
Buyer assistance: pricing based on cost v. FMV
Program compliance
Income level targeted: 120%; 50%?
Pricing/affordability: price limited to costs
Improvements/property standards
Counseling: at least 8 hrs
38. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 38 Structuring Assistance, cont. Enforcement
Affordability period
HOME minimums: 5-15 yrs principle residency
Deed restrictions or notes/mortgages?
Resale/recapture: five options
Recapture: what/when recaptured on
Voluntary sale, involuntary sale, subletting/non-compliance
Program income requirements
39. Underwriting NSP Rental Projects
40. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 40 Market Issues Targeted range of renters
Define minimum income required for affordability
Rental units to meet @5% @ 50% AMI?
Areas of Greatest Need (AGNs)
Concentration of units/activities
Rents
NSP affordable rents
Market competitiveness (over time)
41. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 41 Market, cont. Trends/impact of “shadow market”
Long-term value/marketability
Concentration of investment to overcome neg. factors
Neighborhood advantages: transportation/access to…
42. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 42 Borrower Issues Owner/developer experience/capacity to own
Developer equity/liquidity
Portfolio & contingent liabilities
Professional management
43. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 43 Project Issues Have any/all project deficiencies that caused or contributed to foreclosure been identified?
Costs
Acquisition cost
Relocation?
Codes/rehab standards/property standards
Completion risks
44. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 44 Project, cont. Feasibility
Reasonable “affordable” rents
Realistic vacancy/collection loss
Operating expenses reasonable
Debt coverage ratio
Reasonable, not excessive cash flow
Level of capital subsidy required to serve < 50% AMI
Sustainability: next slide
45. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 45 Sustainability: Rental Projects Long-term pro forma & crossover point
Improvements beyond minimum:
Energy efficiency & maximum useful life
“Competitive” rents
Realistic vacancy (after new car smell is gone)
Adequate management & prev maintenance
Funded reserves
Cushion
46. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 46 Structuring the Assistance Calculation of the fundable gap
Sustainability for affordability period
Program compliance requirements
Occupancy requirements (LMMI)
Marketing
Affordability (rents)
Improvements/property standards
47. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 47 Structuring Assistance, cont. Investment terms
Terms of capital advances
Repayment - cash flow loan?
Enforcement
Affordability period or term: HOME 5 – 20 yrs
Legal documents/mechanism: HOME deed covenant
Occupancy reporting/monitoring requirements
Property standards?
48. Underwriting Land Banking Activities
49. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 49 Land Banking Market: impact of banked property
Borrower:
Ability to maintain/provide interim/develop long-term
Project:
Interim use/protection: adequate security/ management/ maintenance; also interim occupant URA notices
Long-term use strategy (within 10 yrs.)
50. Wrap Up
51. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 51 8 Principles for NSP Underwriting Costs are reasonable, necessary, allocable, documentable
Fees/profit are reasonable
All sources are identified & committed
NSP assistance amount is appropriate (given all public sources) to achieve affordability
52. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 52 Project is ready to proceed within program deadlines
Project is feasible & sustainable for affordability period
Concentration of investments will help stabilize target area
Investment terms protect the public investment for affordability period
53. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 53 Risk Assessment Market
Affordability, demand, AGN impacts (two-way)
Borrower
Developer/owner capacity, buyer
Project
Completion/readiness
Viability/sustainability
Interaction of risks
54. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 54 Addressing Sustainability Starting points:
“Longest feasible term”
Impacting AGNs
Addressing problems that led to foreclosure
Techniques:
Cushion affordability (not minimum assistance)
Provide for reserves & post-closing cash
Extend useful life of improvements
Address energy efficiency
Support with management/maintenance or counseling
55. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 55 Investment Decisions Determine appropriate amount of assistance
Reasonable & necessary
Specify all compliance requirements
Impose affordability period requirements
Create enforcement mechanism & reporting
56. 7/28/09 OCCD Summer Quarterly Meeting 56 Wrap Up Evaluation: additional guidance needed
MLFranke@aol.com