1 / 34

Analysis of 2009 Statewide Assessment Results

Analysis of 2009 Statewide Assessment Results. Vincent Caputo Assistant Superintendent November 17, 2009. Overview of Statewide Assessments. New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK 3 to 8) Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science (Science in grades 4 and 8 only)

asher-rose
Download Presentation

Analysis of 2009 Statewide Assessment Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of 2009 Statewide Assessment Results Vincent Caputo Assistant Superintendent November 17, 2009

  2. Overview of Statewide Assessments • New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK 3 to 8) • Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science (Science in grades 4 and 8 only) • High School Proficiency Assessment – (HSPA - grade 11) – LAL and Math • End-of-Course (EOC) Biology Test • Biology Performance Assessment • End-of-Course (EOC) Algebra Test

  3. Other Assessments • DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) – primary grades • InView section of the Terra Nova - grade 2 • NJPASS 9 and 10 – LAL and Math • Future End-of-Course Tests to replace HSPA

  4. New Proficiency Levels: Higher Standards for NJASK 3, 4 • Completely redesigned tests to provide better information on mastery of NJCCCS • “Raised the bar” • More students statewide in the “partially proficient” category

  5. New Proficiency Levels: Higher Standards for NJASK 3, 4 • Example of impact: (grade 3 LAL) • 2008: 40 points; 16 correct for score of 200 • 2009: 50 points; 25 correct for score of 200 See table for comparisons of statewide proficiency rates

  6. NJASK 3 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 210.3 • Total Proficiency = 73.2% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 4.2% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 69.0% Note: Percentages are rounded and may not total to 100%

  7. NJASK 3 Mathematics • Mean score = 227.1 • Total Proficiency = 79.2% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 30.4% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 48.8%

  8. NJASK 3 LAL and Math:Comparison to DFG and State

  9. NJASK 4 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 211.8 • Total Proficiency = 71.4% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 6.2% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 65.2%

  10. NJASK 4 Mathematics • Mean score = 225.6 • Total Proficiency = 78.3% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 24.8% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 53.4%

  11. NJASK 4 Science • Mean score = 247.9 • Total Proficiency = 98.1% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 55.3% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 42.9%

  12. NJASK 4 LAL, Math and Science:Comparison to DFG and State

  13. NJASK 5 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 212.5 • Total Proficiency = 74.7% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 6.9% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 67.8%

  14. NJASK 5 Mathematics • Mean score = 226.4 • Total Proficiency = 77.6% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 26.4% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 51.1%

  15. NJASK 5 LAL and Math:Comparison to DFG and State

  16. NJASK 6 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 222.1 • Total Proficiency = 89.0% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 10.4% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 78.6%

  17. NJASK 6 Mathematics • Mean score = 227.1 • Total Proficiency = 79.9% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 25.3% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 54.6%

  18. NJASK 6 LAL and Math:Comparison to DFG and State

  19. NJASK 7 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 227.2 • Total Proficiency = 88.1% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 24.3% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 63.8%

  20. NJASK 7 Mathematics • Mean score = 221.9 • Total Proficiency = 74.6% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 28.2% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 46.3%

  21. NJASK 7 LAL and Math:Comparison to DFG and State

  22. NJASK 8 Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 231.0 • Total Proficiency = 97.0% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 14.9% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 82.1%

  23. NJASK 8 Mathematics • Mean score = 229.7 • Total Proficiency = 86.5% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 32.5% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 54%

  24. NJASK 8 Science • Mean score = 245.5 • Total Proficiency = 96.5% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 42.3% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 54.2%

  25. NJASK 8 LAL, Math, Science:Comparison to DFG and State

  26. HSPA Language Arts Literacy • Mean score = 229.8 • Total Proficiency = 92.1% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 15.8% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 76.3%

  27. HSPA Mathematics • Mean score = 224.4 • Total Proficiency = 81.4% • Advanced Proficient (Scale score 250+) = 17.7% • Proficient (Scale score 200-249)= 63.7%

  28. HSPA LAL and Math:Comparison to DFG and State

  29. EOC Biology (raw scores):Comparison to DFG and State

  30. What are we doing to ensure student success? • Differentiated instruction: “one size does not fit all” • Standards-based curriculum planning • Flexible scheduling with basic skills • Better use of data to inform instruction • Focused professional development for teachers and administrators

  31. Summary:Comparison to previous performance

  32. Summary:Comparison to DFG-FG

  33. Summary:Comparison to statewide results

  34. Thanks! • Renae LaPrete, Interim Superintendent • District Administrators • Teachers • Education Services Personnel • Parents

More Related