1 / 19

Family Planning Effort Scores

Family Planning Effort Scores. Results from the 2004 Round. John Ross, ‘Demi Adelaja, John Stover Supported by the MEASURE Evaluation Project September 14, 2005. Purpose.

ashton
Download Presentation

Family Planning Effort Scores

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Family Planning Effort Scores Results from the 2004 Round John Ross, ‘Demi Adelaja, John Stover Supported by the MEASURE Evaluation Project September 14, 2005

  2. Purpose • To measure inputs to national family planning programs, separate from outputs such as contraceptive use or total fertility rates • Assess effort in 30 components to create profiles of effort – summarize in 4 components • Monitor program effort in over 90 countries over time (1972, 1982, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004)

  3. Component 1: Policy • Policy on fertility reduction and family planning • Statement by leaders • Level of program leadership • Policy on age at marriage • Import laws and legal regulations • Advertising of contraceptives allowed • Involvement of other ministries and public agencies • Percent of in-country funding of family planning budget

  4. Component 2: Services • Involvement of private-sector agencies and groups • Civil bureaucracy involved • Community-based distribution (CBD) • Social marketing • Postpartum program • Home-visiting workers • Administrative structure • Training program • Personnel carry out assigned tasks • Logistics and transport • Supervision system • Mass media for IEC • Incentives and disincentives

  5. Component 3: Evaluation and Monitoring • Record keeping • Evaluation • Management’s use of evaluation findings

  6. Component 4: Method Availability • IUDs • Pills or injectables • Female sterilization • Male sterilization • Condoms • Safe abortion

  7. Trends in Total FP Effort Score Long form score for 2004 estimated from short form score

  8. Trends in Total FP Effort Score with Population Weights

  9. Effort Trends by Region

  10. Close Match of 30 Effort Scores Between 1999 and 2004 Availability Policies Services M&E

  11. Effort Scores by Effort in 1972

  12. Effort Scores by Component and Region

  13. Percent with Reasonable Access to Each Contraceptive Method

  14. Strength of Justification for National Program: All Countries

  15. Emphasis on Special Populations: All Countries

  16. Influences on National Programs: All Countries

  17. Influences on National Programs: Distribution of Countries

  18. Thank you!

More Related