230 likes | 365 Views
Federalism. Figure 3.1: Lines of Power in Three Systems of Government. Unitary Government National Government - Supreme. Confederation States - Supreme. Federal Government Shared Power-Federal Government - Supreme in Some Areas Only. American Federalism.
E N D
Unitary Government National Government - Supreme
Confederation States - Supreme
Federal Government Shared Power-Federal Government - Supreme in Some Areas Only
American Federalism • A bold, new plan to protect personal liberty • Founders believed that neither national nor state government would have authority over the other because power derives from the people, who shift their support. • New plan had no historical precedent. • Tenth Amendment was added as an afterthought, to define the power of states
John Marshall Chief Justice of Supreme Court (1801-1835)
Marbury vs Madison (1803) Judicial Review
McCulloch vs Maryland (1819) “necessary and proper clause”
Article I, Section 8 Article VI, the Supremacy Clause 10th Amendment Article IV
Dual federalism • Both national and state governments supreme in their own spheres • Hence interstate versus intrastate commerce • Early product-based distinction difficult • "Original package" also unsatisfactory
Grants-in-aid • Grants show how political realities modify legal authority. • Began before the Constitution with "land grant colleges," various cash grants to states • Dramatically increased in scope in the twentieth century • Were attractive for various reasons • Federal budget surpluses (nineteenth century) • Federal income tax became a flexible tool • Federal control of money supply meant national government could print more money • "Free" money for state officials
Meeting national needs: 1960s shift in grants-in-aid • Meeting national needs: 1960s shift in grants-in-aid • From what states demanded • To what federal officials found important as national needs
Categorical grants versus revenue sharing • Categorical grants for specific purposes; often require local matching funds • Block grants devoted to general purposes with few restrictions • Revenue sharing requires no matching funds and provides freedom in how to spend. • Distributed by statistical formula • Ended in 1986
Mandates • Most concern civil rights and environmental protection • Administrative and financial problems often result • Growth in mandates, 1981 to 1991 • Features of mandates • Regulatory statutes and amendments of previous legislation • New areas of federal involvement • Considerable variation in clarity, administration, and costs
Federal courts have fueled the growth of mandates Court orders and prisons, school desegregation, busing, hiring practices, police brutality
Conditions of aid • Received by states voluntarily, in theory • Financial dependence blurs the theory • Civil rights generally the focus of most important conditions in the 1960's, a proliferation has continued since the 1970's
Renewed effort to shift important functions to states by Republican-controlled Congress in 1994 Key issue: welfare (i.e., the AFDC program) These and other turn-back efforts were referred to as devolution. • Old idea, but led by Congress • Clinton agreed with need to scale back size and activities of federal government.
Figure 3.2: The Changing Purposes of Federal Grants to State and Local Governments Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 1999, Table 12.2, 205-210.
Figure 3.3: Federal Aid to State and Local Governments, 1980-2000 Source: Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 1998, Historical Tables, Table 6.1, 99.
Figure 3.5: Devolution in the Polls: The States over Washington
For more information about this topic, link to the Metropolitan Community College Political Science Web Site http://socsci.mccneb.edu/pos/polscmain.htm