110 likes | 230 Views
CELDi Conference, Stillwater, OK, 11-12 April 2005. Study 2: Experimental Evidence on Multi-Agency Team Coordination. The Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Lab Industrial Engineering Department University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. How effectively can we respond to emergency?. Hurricane.
E N D
CELDi Conference, Stillwater, OK, 11-12 April 2005 Study 2: Experimental Evidence on Multi-Agency Team Coordination The Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Lab Industrial Engineering Department University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
How effectively can we respond to emergency? Hurricane Earthquake Tsunami
Administration Planning Operation Command Incident Command System (ICS) • 9-11 commission recommended ICS • ICS can provide a unified command center that will have a decision maker representing eachkey agency, when multiple agencies or jurisdictions are involved in a response
Problem Statement • Better organized logistics needed to respond to a terrorist attack • Command and control of multi agency teams • Supply restocking issues for hospitals and ambulances
Research Goals • Empirically investigate how multi-agency logistics teams respond to emergency that needs major operational coordination • Team performance • Team cognition • Identify environmental determinants that affect multi-agency logistics team coordination and collaboration Effective multi-agency service teams
Method • Participant • Command and Control Chief • Fire Chief • Police Commissioner • Chief Logistician • Healthcare Administrator • Experimental Task To provide organized logistics in disaster hit by coordinating among multi agencies to help rescue civilians and provide necessary medical and food help
Experiment Environment • Modified RoboCupRescue Simulation Provide emergency decision support by integration of disaster information, prediction, planning and human interface • Structure of the RCRS • Fire Chief Module • Logistician Module
Independent Variables • Communication mode • Types of communications available • Video + Audio + Text vs. Audio + Text • Shared Learning • learning across multiply organizational cultures • Cross Training vs No Training • Awareness • Understanding the activities of others, which provides a context for your own activity. High level means maximum awareness of the situation. • High Level vs. Low Level
Dependent Variables • Team Performance • Task time • Waiting time • Inventory level • Team Cognition • Communication • Mental models • Coordination