HLSC122: critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample

1. HLSC122: Critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample Get ​nursing assignment help in Australia​ from a ​best assignment helper​ at a reliable and authentic assignment provider website (Assignmenthelpforyou.com) in Australia. Student Name:​ XYZ XYZ HLSC122 Semester 2, 2018 Assessment 3: Critical appraisal of evidence Introduction It is essential to follow the evidence based practice for the best patient consideration. (Richardson-Tench, Taylor, Kerrnode & Roberts, 2016). EBP incorporates the best research proof, clinical ability, the patient's individual qualities and conditions, and the attributes of the training in which the wellbeing proficient works. Thispaper represents a critical analysis of the research on the Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study, a research conducted by Brown, Beard, Kotz, Michie, and West (2014). This essay will critically appraise a quantitative study, by inspecting authorship, research question, research methods and findings along with its validation with the research objectives and purpose. PART A Brown, J., Beard, E., Kotz, D., Michie, S., & West, R. (2014). Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study. Addiction, 109(9), 1531-1540. Authorship In this paper, the author has significantly given an in-depth analysis of the factors that could influence the real-world effectiveness of the e-cigarettes. The scholar through his work has aimed to evaluate the efficiency of e-cigarettes when these are used to support smoking cessation compared to nicotine replacement therapy. The scholar has used a cross-sectional survey so as to gather information and data with regard to the subject matter on the effectiveness of e-cigarettes (Brown et al, 2014).

2. HLSC122: Critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample Get ​nursing assignment help in Australia​ from a ​best assignment helper​ at a reliable and authentic assignment provider website (Assignmenthelpforyou.com) in Australia. The authors of the research are doctors of affiliated hospitals in London, United Kingdom. It is one of the most significant steps taken by the doctor to join hands together and take a step forward to publish their research paper regarding the effectiveness of e-cigarettes. Therefore, these scholars are qualified to undertake this research (Brown et al, 2014). In addition to this, it is also evident from the references that have been followed by the author's that the research is conducted based on the evidence of diverse journals and the academics have expertise in such profession. Research Question Qualitative research is a procedure of naturalistic request that looks for top to bottom comprehension of participant’s instinctive practices and the research question should reflect the established procedure of intrigue.The key objective of the research was to find out the potency of the e-cigarettes in comparison to other nicotine substitution remedy for the smoking abandonment in adults. s The aim of this study is to find out the significance of the use of e-cigarettes in quitting smoking and its effectiveness than compared to the nicotine replacement theory. The scholar in their work have very well presented the aim and scope of the study, however, failed to segregate the same under different headings. This makes it difficult for the readers to find out the research aim and question. The authors have justified the need of this study by means of analyzing the research gap. The research suggests that though a number of studies have been conducted with regard to the evaluation of the relationship between the use of e-cigarettes as well as the smoking status in the real world via conducting surveys on the regular e-cigarette users. However, according to the scholars Brown et al (2014), neither of these researches adjusted for significant potential confounding variables and both evaluated the relationship between relinquishing smoking along with the use of e-cigarettes for any purpose.

3. HLSC122: Critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample Get ​nursing assignment help in Australia​ from a ​best assignment helper​ at a reliable and authentic assignment provider website (Assignmenthelpforyou.com) in Australia. In the present-day scenario, there are a number of ongoing programs that are tracking the use of e-cigarettes among the general population in England by assessing the number of smokers who have quit smoking after using e-cigarettes or by use of any different methods. Thus, with the gap analysis, the authors have emphasized that it becomes critical to differentiate that whether the use of e-cigarettes in a quit attempt advances the probabilities of success with regard to that attempt, such as reduction of smoking and suppresses the chances of smoking again for whatsoever reason. Research Design The research design used in this research is a cross-sectional survey conducted in the household. As this is a primary research, the survey was conducted with a sample of over 6000 respondents in England, who have reported a most recent quit smoking attempt during the past twelve months. The cross-sectional method is a research method which is used to capture information which is highly based on the data based on a specific point of time. According to the point of view of scholars Mann (2003), in cross-sectional research, the data is gathered at the same time from those people having similar characteristics but then again are dissimilar on interest factors, for instance, age, geographic location as well as their income levels. In the present case, the respondents have been selected based on similar characteristics, i.e. smoking, however, they belong to different age group, different level of income and such. Therefore, using this research design is justified. Research Methods The method that has been used in this research to collect data is a random sampling. The researchers have used standard deviation and the mean for evaluating the association between characteristics of the samples of the research as well as the use of diverse methods to quit smoking. The advantage of this method is that it removes biases in the evaluation of data and there is an equal probability of selection of the samples. (Greenhalgh et al, 2017) However, the limitation of this method is its complexity in understanding the variables and its analysis using a quantitative method. Moreover, it is also time-consuming (Kelly et al, 2003).

4. HLSC122: Critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample Get ​nursing assignment help in Australia​ from a ​best assignment helper​ at a reliable and authentic assignment provider website (Assignmenthelpforyou.com) in Australia. Results The results of the research have been very well represented by the scholars in a systematic manner by means of using quantitative data analysis to evaluate the assessment and form the conclusion. In addition to this, the researchers have been able to demonstrate that among those smokers who have tried to quit smoking without any professional support by means of using e-cigarettes have reported asceticism than compared to those smokers who have used a licensed NRT product. One of the major limitations is that the NRT over-the-counter and e-cigarettes were both represented as heterogeneous groups. PART B The above research has been presented in a systematic format analyzing the effectiveness of e-cigarette over the NRT. The shreds of pieces of evidence that have been found in the research can be used in the real world to evaluate the results and the impact of e-cigarettes on smoking addicts. However, one of the major barriers in such method is utilizing e-cigarettes and NRT to find out the ultimate results. Using both the techniques so as to bring out the effectiveness of one method will cost thousands of dollars and greater physical efforts as well. Conclusion Overall evaluation of the above research highlights the systematic representation of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes on those people who have tried to quit smoking. The researcher has very well carried out the valuation of the data that has been collected from a large population of England. The use of methodology, i.e. The cross-sectional approach and descriptive statistics were used significantly for the purpose of analysis of the results. The methods and the research design have been able to attain the research aims and objective in a crucial manner. Thus, the evidence that is present in the study can be used in the real world so as to find the ultimate results.ConclusionThe overall evaluation of the above research highlights the systematic representation of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes on those people who have tried to quit smoking. The researcher has very well carried out the valuation of the data that has been collected from a large population of England. The use of methodology, i.e. The cross-sectional approach and descriptive statistics were used

5. HLSC122: Critical appraisal of evidence assessment sample Get ​nursing assignment help in Australia​ from a ​best assignment helper​ at a reliable and authentic assignment provider website (Assignmenthelpforyou.com) in Australia. significantly for the purpose of analysis of the results. The methods and the research design have been able to attain the research aims and objective in a crucial manner. Thus, the evidence that is present in the study can be used in the real world so as to find the ultimate results. References Brown, J., Beard, E., Kotz, D., Michie, S., & West, R. (2014). Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study. Addiction, 109(9), 1531-1540. Greenhalgh, T.M., Bidwell, J., Crisp, E., Lambros, A., & Warland, J.(2017). Understanding research methods for evidence-based practice in health le. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com-ezproxy1-acu-edu-au,eproxy2.acu.edu.au/ Healy, M., & Perry, C. (2000). Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(3), 118-126. Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261-266. Mann, C. J. (2003). Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(1), 54-60. Richardson-Tench, M., Taylor, B., Kermode, S.,& Roberts, K. (2016). Inquiry in health care (5th[ACU]ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.