210 likes | 482 Views
Buy and Build Strategy. Buy Build Layer Improve, distinguish, consolidate Collaborate Open Source is both “build” and “buy” Portal, portfolio, CMS, Fin Aid…. Web “Lens”. 1- Institutional Presentation Image, Brand, Appearance 2- Resolve Disparity System, Hardware, Software, Era
E N D
Buy and Build Strategy • Buy • Build • Layer • Improve, distinguish, consolidate • Collaborate • Open Source is both “build” and “buy” • Portal, portfolio, CMS, Fin Aid…
Web “Lens” • 1- Institutional Presentation • Image, Brand, Appearance • 2- Resolve Disparity • System, Hardware, Software, Era • 3- Change Business Practices • Quickly, Cheaply, Creatively Vendors see Web as a user interface and market requirement.
Compound “Lens” • The Institution, System Integration • UD Presentation • Resolve Disparity • Change Business Practices • The Customer, The User Experience • Personalize • Customize Resolution, Differentiation
Why a Portal • Resolve disparity • Adopt person-centric user interface • Keep pace with changing expectations • Adopt transformation technology • Provide framework for application development
uPortal Open Source Project • 2 ½ years • $770,000 Mellon Foundation Grant • Contributed effort: Dozen core developers • 100 Implementations • Hundreds of Thousands of Users • 11 Countries • 7 Commercial Vendors
Original Motivation • Combat “Free” Portals • Provide and Share Experience • Build Community • Promote Standards • Come Together • “For Education, By Education”
uPortal • Dozen Developer Institutions • One Hundred Implementations • Hundreds of thousands of users • Eleven Countries • Seven Commercial Partners • Various Spin-offs • Engaged with other efforts.
CSG Participation • Yale • Princeton • Columbia • Delaware • Cornell • Virginia • Colorado • Brown, Washington, Wisconsin, Georgetown
Model for Open Source • uPortal Success Factors • Collaboration • Community • Cash • Commercial Partnership • Community Source
Community • For Education by Education • Contribute Effort • Provide Support • Community vs Vendor Relations • “Membership” • Spinoffs
Community Source • Open? • Bounded • Market-Driven • Undirected • Community Target • Value of Community • Community Behavior
Cash (Funding) • Seed Efforts • Enable Commercial Partnership • Ensure Progress • Stamp of Approval • Self-Sustaining Plan • $800k, $3m, Free
Commerical Partners • Dedicated Resources • Long-term Support • Long-term Development • Potential Contributors • Marketing
CampusPipeline/SCT UNICON/IBS im&m Sigma Systems Datatel LAT RSmart iAssessment Channels WebCT Blackboard Successful Commercialization
Good OSS • Lower Costs • Higher Quality • Better Support • Lower Risk • User Driven • Flexible • Standards
Open SourceLimitations • Less financial backing • Non-existent marketing budgets • Depends on community interest • “Open” vs “Managed” conflict • No one to litigate • Limit to size and complexity
Open Source Software • Free? • Open? • Collaborative? • Risky? • Non-Commercial? • Influence the Marketplace
More Information • JA-SIG uPortal Conference • Denver- June 2004 • JA-SIG and uPortal • www.ja-sig.org • Delaware’s UD&me demo • uportal.udel.edu • Open Source Portfolio Initiative • www.theospi.org • carlj@udel.edu