1 / 34

Introduction to Turnitin Centre for Teaching and Learning University of Limerick, Ireland [W] www.ul.ie/ctl Updated Sept

Introduction to Turnitin Centre for Teaching and Learning University of Limerick, Ireland [W] www.ul.ie/ctl Updated Sept 2011 by Angelica Risquez. Overview. Types of assignments and originality check Case scenarios and teaching advice Using Turnitin with Sulis Using Turnitin on its own

aulii
Download Presentation

Introduction to Turnitin Centre for Teaching and Learning University of Limerick, Ireland [W] www.ul.ie/ctl Updated Sept

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Turnitin Centre for Teaching and LearningUniversity of Limerick, Ireland[W]www.ul.ie/ctl Updated Sept 2011 by Angelica Risquez

  2. Overview Types of assignments and originality check Case scenarios and teaching advice Using Turnitin with Sulis Using Turnitin on its own Originality report Grademark Peermark

  3. Turnitin Overview www.turnitin.com

  4. Types of “Assignments” Paper assignment is the base assignment for all other assignments types. Used to obtain an Originality Report PeerMark assignment: allows students to review their peers' papers based on scale and free response questions selected by the instructor. Revision Assignment allows students to submit multiple drafts without overwriting the previous drafts/submissions Reflection Assignment is designed as a learning journal where students write about what they learned from the writing process as well as offer feedback on the assignment they worked on.

  5. Originality Check It determines the congruence of text to sources in: • Publicly accessible Internet sources • Every document already submitted to Turnitin* • Assignments from within the class * Lecturers can opt out from Turnitin storing papers. Only the lecturer can access the submitted paper.

  6. Originality Check PROS CONS • Allows for citation verification and quickly provides documentation of alleged plagiarism • Detects rewording • Both lecturer and students can upload • It allows for peer to peer plagiarism detection • It dos not search subscription databases (e.g. Library databases, newspapers, etc) unless those materials also appear in assignments previously sent to Turnitin. • It does not differentiate between quoted materials and original writing!

  7. Possible Scenario • A lecturer (or student who has access to it) receives an originality report showing a match for the following passage: • Today, according to authors of The Death of “e” and the Birth of the Real New Economy doing business electronically is the only way to stay alive and competitive. It is a necessity to get involved in the digital economy. Therefore, “e” is disappearing from our vocabulary because conducting business electronically is a normal, every-day activity. • Upon clicking on the comparison link, you find that the text is found in an on-line article, entitled The Death of “e” and the Birth of the Real New Economy. • Is this plagiarism or a false positive? Why?

  8. Teaching advice • Use it proactively • Notify and explain to your students • Clear plagiarism policy: definition, avoidance, guidelines and disciplinary process. • Help students develop writing skills. • Writing Centre http://www.ul.ie/ctl/regional-writing-centre • Train and support students (e.g. trial submission) • Involve students (e.g. submit themselves) • Be creative! (e.g. using originality report in tutorials, peer review and online grading features, allowing multiple drafts of an assignment…)

  9. Teaching Advice (2) UL resources • http://www2.ul.ie/pdf/201553623.pdf(Appendix 5: Plagiarism at College by Prof Sarah Moore) • http://www.ul.ie/~library/GLIS/html/index.htm(Library online tutorials on Harvard referencing style, Refworks, researching with the internet, etc). Other resources • http://www.turnitin.com/static/support.html • http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/ • The Turnitin blog

  10. Using Turnitin with Sulis • From September 2011, Sulis and Turnitin are integrated, meaning • No need to create lecturer or students accounts • When students submit into the Assignment tool in Sulis, a Turnitin report can be generated • Instructors may also choose to allow students to view the reports How to set up my Sulis Assignment to get a Turnitin report

  11. Using Turnitin on its own If you want to submit your own documents into Turnitin, or use the Grademark and/or Peermark features, you need to use Turnitin on its own Steps: Create a user profile Create classes and assignments Instructor/students submit work

  12. 1. Create a user profile Go to www.turnitin.com and start by clicking Create Account.

  13. 1. Create a user profile To get the account ID and a password for your college, log a call with ITD Service Desk http://inside/itdservicedesk/default.htm

  14. 2. Create a class and assignment

  15. 2. Create a class and assignment

  16. 2. Create a class and assignment Add rubrics, exclude bibliographic/quoted materials/small matches, allow students to see originality report, allow submissions after due date and search options

  17. 3. Instructors/students submit Instructor workload a high b medium c low passive active Student involvement

  18. 3. Instructors/students submit a. The instructor submits • Advantages • Minimal student induction • With large classes, you can submit all papers at once (.zip file from Sulis or other LMS, use IE!) • Disadvantages • Students lack of involvement • They may not pay as much attention to the originality of their work

  19. 3. Instructors/students submit a. The instructor submits

  20. 3. Instructors/students submit b. Instructor registers students, they submit • Advantages • No errors with student accounts • Minimal induction • Student awareness and involvement, e.g students could see their originality report, do peer reviews (PeerMark), view online grading (GradeMarks), etc. • Disadvantages • They need to know how to log in and submit (handout and/or training needed) • You need a class list with name, surname and email, e.g.patricia, wong, 09563214@studentmail.ul.ie

  21. 3. Instructors/students submit b. Instructor registers students, they submit Turnitin will automatically send the student an email with a provisional password. Students log in and submit their work. They get added to your class if they already have an account

  22. 3. Instructors/students submit c. Student create their account and submit • Advantages • Student awareness and involvement, e.g students could see their originality report, do peer reviews (PeerMark), view online grading (GradeMarks), etc. • Minimal initial lecturer input • Disadvantages • Some induction needed (handout and/or training needed) • Possible teething problems and support (i.e. wrong email address, creating accounts twice…). A trial is recommended

  23. 3. Instructors/students submit c. Student create their account and submit Customise and distribute the “Student Turnitin Guide” with your class ID and enrolment password: http://www.ul.ie/ctl/turnitin-plagiarism-prevention-software

  24. Originality Report (1) An originality report can be generated through the Assignments tool in Sulis or through a Turnitin account. Once it is ready… A greyed-out report icon indicates that the report has not yet been generated. Please wait a few moments and click your browser’s refresh button (large reports may take up to 24hh to process)

  25. Originality report (2)

  26. Originality report (3)

  27. Grademark 3:44 You can add comments within the body of the paper, point out grammar and punctuation mistakes, evaluate the paper against your own rubrics or predefined ones, etc. Complete instructions available Chapter 4 of Instructor Handout http://www.ul.ie/ctl/turnitin-plagiarism-prevention-software

  28. Peermark Allows students to read, review, and evaluate one or many papers submitted by their classmates. Instructors can choose whether the reviews are anonymous or attributed, decide if students should be excluded from reviews, pair students, and assign students specific papers to review. 8:23

  29. Peermark (2) Create new assignment as in slide 13, and select PeerMark Assignment (can only be created if a class has at least one paper assignment created) Note: the due date of the base assignment must come before the start date and time of the PeerMark assignment. If anonymity in the review is desired, student submissions should not contain the name of the author in the text or at the top of the paper By default, reviews are anonymous and only those student who submit can review, but you can change it in “Show more options” The start date is the date students can begin reading papers and writing reviews. The due date prevents students from writing reviews after this date. The post date is the date students will have access to reviews written by their classmates

  30. Peermark (3) In Step 2, the instructor determines how many papers will be distributed to the students in the course. By default, PeerMark will automatically distribute papers to students Click Save & Continue or click on the Show more distribution options link to exclude student papers from distribution or specify which student papers a student(s) will have to review. Note: you need to have students registered as seen in slide 19 In Step 3, add questions for students to answer (your own or from Sample Library)

  31. Peermark (4) After the start date of the PeerMark assignment students may begin writing peer reviews. To view which papers students have reviewed click on the View link next to the PeerMark assignment. Instructors can then view an individual student’s reviews by clicking on the Show details link to the right of the students name. The instructor can write a review to supplement those that students will receive from their peers. An instructor may also comment on the paper they are reviewing. A comment is equivalent to the notes that an instructor may write in the margins of a paper Instructors may grade the reviews written by the students

  32. Peermark (5) Instructors may view a paper’s peer reviews within the document viewer once a reviewer submits a PeerMark review. To view a paper in the document viewer click on the paper’s title within the assignment inbox for the paper assignment the peer review is based on.

  33. Peermark (6) To view the PeerMark questions and answers click on ? icon. To view a list of all the comments left on the paper click on the mark list icon. To grade a reviewer click on the reviewer’s name, or to edit the grade click on the grade next to the reviewer’s name.

  34. Questions? Advanced guides, videos, case students and more in http://www.turnitin.com/static/support.html Teaching support and advice in the CTL: Dr. Angélica Risquez Technology Enhanced Learning Advisor Centre for Teaching and Learning Millstream Courtyard University of Limerick Limerick, Ireland [T] +353-61-202 580 [F] +353-61-338 044 [E] angelica.risquez@ul.ie [W] www.ul.ie/ctl

More Related