1 / 10

21 st October 2019

Benchmarking Research Data Services at Research Institutions – the RDARI survey James A J Wilson (UCL) Ville Tenhunen (Helsinki) Keith Russell (ARDC) & the RDARI IG. 21 st October 2019. The RDARI Interest Group of the Research Data Alliance.

aulii
Download Presentation

21 st October 2019

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarking Research Data Services at Research Institutions – the RDARI survey James A J Wilson (UCL) Ville Tenhunen (Helsinki) Keith Russell (ARDC) & the RDARI IG 21st October 2019

  2. The RDARI Interest Group of the Research Data Alliance • Research Data Architectures in Research Institutions (RDARI) Objectives • Exploring how diverse tools, technologies, and services can be integrated to meet the evolving needs of researchers in research institutions. • Considering interoperability between institutional research data infrastructures and (inter)national or discipline-based infrastructures • Understanding the different institutional approaches to governance structures and business processes in responding to research ICT demands (e.g. capacity planning/forecasting for storage) • Sharing case studies of solutions developed by data infrastructure projects in research institutions • Presenting technical innovations and ideas that can further the development of integrated research data infrastructures • Agreeing best practice relating to research data architectures in research institutions

  3. Why and How the Survey was Developed • Aims: • Comparing policies and practicalities • Understanding state of the art within the field • Making contact with others using same technologies and solutions • Getting ideas on what works from others • Mapping developments over time • Getting a sense of the range of services being provided • Processes: • Seeking relevant questions to re-use related surveys • Remote brainstorming of questions • Validation and addition of questions at RDA Plenaries • Consideration of whether questions are ambiguous and actually answerable • Consideration of possible answers and ontologies • Narrowing of questions to a manageable length • Selection of survey tool and building of survey • Testing • Tracking distribution

  4. The Survey Structure & Questions • Introduction • About the Institution and Respondent • Governance • Infrastructure and volumes • Services: • Research Data Storage (for ‘live’ data) • Research Data Repository or Archive • RDM Advisory Service • Research Data Back-up Service • Data Management Planning Service • Research Database Hosting • Electronic Lab Notebooks • Data Safe Haven or Sensitive Data Handling • Dark Archive • Local/Remote File Synchronization • Special Data Collections Showcase • Any other data management Services • Gaps and integrations • Personal details (if happy to share) Repeating question set for each service

  5. Hot off the Press – Results so far! • As of 3pm UTC Thursday 18th October, we have had 24 complete responses, although and additional 7 made it as far as the Repository questions, and are included here.

  6. Hot off the Press – Results so far! Govenance

  7. Hot off the Press – Results so far! Services

  8. Hot off the Press – Results so far! Cost Models

  9. Hot off the Press – Results so far! Integrations

  10. Thank you! Thanks Now complete the Survey! https://opinio.ucl.ac.uk/s?s=63105

More Related