1 / 16

Collaborative Learning On-Line

Collaborative Learning On-Line. Pilot Findings from an Inter-Program Project. Participants. Auburn University (Randy McDaniel) Hofstra University (Andrea Perkins) Utah State University (Michael Millington). Background. The Traditional/Distance Classroom Challenge

austin
Download Presentation

Collaborative Learning On-Line

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaborative Learning On-Line Pilot Findings from an Inter-Program Project

  2. Participants • Auburn University (Randy McDaniel) • Hofstra University (Andrea Perkins) • Utah State University (Michael Millington)

  3. Background • The Traditional/Distance Classroom Challenge • Transactional distance & Equivalent experience • Identifiably different populations • The Guidance of Theory • Community Learning • The Opportunity of Technology • Web 2.0 Thinking • Virtual Community Center (NCRTM)

  4. Plan • Collaborating Assessment Classes • Minimal coordination of syllabi • Minimal ground rules • Applied Tools • Forum • Wiki • Course Evaluation • Focus Group • Survey

  5. Course Page

  6. Forum Page

  7. Forum Topics • Celebrating Diversity • Assessment Stories • Ethics Shmethics • Resources and Links • Value Drive Profession • Professionalization • Voc Eval: Tools of Oppression? • Support Systems • Test Accommodations • Safe Place • O*NET • Business Perspective (student) • Deaf Community • Recovery Model • Changing Science and Practice

  8. Forum Observations • Story Telling • Self Disclosure • Identify Problems and solutions (A-B-C) • Examples • Report Facts • Start own Topic • Cross Cohort dialog • Pro X Student • Student X Student • Pro X Pro • Respond to each other • Validate • Emotional Support • Emotional response • Interpret • Build upon • Summarize • Challenge or disagree • Ask Questions • Answer questions • Threads (5:1:1:1:1) • Share Resources

  9. WIKI

  10. WIKI • Procedure • Log in • Pick topic • Research & post • Edit other entries • Observations • Students reticent to edit • Quality submittals • Not as popular as the forums

  11. Course Evaluation: Focus Group • Feedback & Brainstorming • Wiki • Forum • Other Resources • Planning for Improvement • Prioritize • Organize • Next Step

  12. Focus Group Themes: Feedback WIKI Forum Newbies have fewer stories Time Intensive Valuable Networking Affective Connections With people Through stories Too many emails • Shared expertise across levels of experience • Lack of exposure to format • Suspect reputation • Huge potential as a resource • Professionals • Textbook

  13. Focus Group: Improvements WIKI Forums More networking activities More Student led threads Focus & coordinate topics with syllabi One topic per week, one topic at a time Structured vs.open topics? Teach students to post • Control and supervise editing • Expert Panel Review • Set and train ground rules • Student run, collaborate across programs • Link to other resources • Start WIKI at beginning of class • Open non-editing use to others.

  14. Focus Group: Other Resources • Student presentations • Live cross-campus chat • Bulletin board • Facebook mentoring • Test review libraries • Asynchronous training modules • Report writing, etc. • Test administration videos (?) • Student testing over the internet (?) • Instrument development (project) • Field interviews • Case studies, documents, links

  15. Satisfaction Survey • N = 23 • Scale 1 - 6 • 9 CRC Knowledge domains: 4.6 • WIKI: 4.5 (knowledge satisfaction r = .50) • Forum: 5.0 (knowledge satisfaction r = .61)

  16. Next Steps & QA • Site development • Course coordination • Research design & publication • Recruit new players • Questions?

More Related