300 likes | 635 Views
What is your thoughts about the relationship between leadership and whether you are a man or a woman?. Do men emerge as leaders more often than women?. Study by Margarie(1969). Effects of dominance and sex on leader emergenceGender neutral taskSome subjects were rated high on a dominance scale and
E N D
1. Leadership and the role of Gender Effects of Sex and Gender Roles on Leader Emergence
2. What is your thoughts about the relationship between leadership and whether you are a man or a woman? Do men emerge as leaders more often than women?
3. Study by Margarie(1969) Effects of dominance and sex on leader emergence
Gender neutral task
Some subjects were rated high on a dominance scale and others low.
Subjects were put into dyads
4. Study by Margarie(1969) Same sex dyad
High dominance emerged as leader 70% of the time
5. Study by Margarie(1969) Mixed Sex
High domenent male emerged as leader 88% of the time
6. Study by Margarie(1969) Mixed Sex
High dominent female emerged as leader 25%
7. The study has been replicated several times with about the same results
8. Over the past several decades several things have happened to blur the sex differences in leader emergence Mass entrance of women into the workforce
Increasing # of female managers
Societal shift in gender role peception
9. Perceptions of Gender vs Perceptions of Sex Gender
Characteristics of Masculinity
Self assertive and motivated to master their environment e.g. aggressive, independent, self sufficient, forceful, dominant.
Characteristics of Femininity
Selfless, Concern for others, emotional sensitivity, cooperation e.g kind, helpful, understanding, warm, sympathetic, aware of others feelings
People of either biological sex can have masculine, feminine or both characteristics
10. Maybe its not that men emerge as leaders more frequently but people, men or women, with masculine characteristics emerge as leaders
11. Study by Goktepe and Schneier (1989) Sex had no effect on leader emergence
Gender did
Masculine subjects emerged as leaders more often than feminine, androgynous or undifferentiated subjects.
12. Definitions Masculine high masculinity, low femininity
Feminine low masculinity, high femininity
Androgynous high masculinity, high femininity
Undifferentiated Low masculinity, low femininity
13. Kent and Moss (1997)-Hypothses Men will more often emerge as leaders in group situations than women
Group members high in masculinity will emerge more frequently than will those low in masculinity
Gender identity is more important than biological sex
Individuals classified masculine or androgynous emerge as leaders more frequently than feminine or undifferentiated.
Masculine and androgynous individuals are perceived as leaders more of by the group and by themselves
14. Kent and Moss (1997) Studied MBA students
Findings
Masculinity is an important predictor of leader emergence
Androgynous individuals have the same chance of emerging as leaders as masculine individuals.
Possession of feminine characteristics doesnt decrease leader emergence so long as masculine characteristics are present
15. Gender roles and context Studies of gender roles and leader emergence done in research, rather than business settings.
But context is important.
Organizational roles and expectations (frequently masculine)
Gender roles selected based on the expectations of organizational roles
16. Leadership Style the way that people lead
17. Leadership Style Task Accomplishment
Sometimes called initiating structure
Interpersonal Relationships
Consideration
Autocratic
directive
Democratic
participative
18. Task (initiate structure) Having subordinates follow rules and procedures
Maintain high standards of performance
Specific roles and assignments for leaders and followers
19. Interpersonal relationships (consideration) Helping subordinates
Look out for subordinates well being
Explaining and coaching
Being friendly and available
20. Autocratic Democratic Democratic
Behave democratically
Allow subordinates to participate in the decision making process
Autocratic
Behave autocratically
Discourage subordinates from participating in the decision making process
21. Relationship of Gender and Style In laboratory studies, men were more task oriented and women more consideration oriented.
Men were more autocratic and women more democratic in laboratory studies
In organizational settings style is influenced more by organizational role expectations than by gender stereotyping.
If you are expected to be task oriented in a particular organization, you willregardless of your gender.
22. Relationship of Gender and Style (contd.) However, the tendency to be autocratic if you are a man and democratic if you are a woman is consistent in both laboratory and organizational settings
23. Gender, style and leader emergence (Eagly & Karau, 1991) In task oriented groups, men are more likely to emerge as leaders, and manage autocratically.
In socially oriented groups, women are more likely to emerge as leaders and manage anticipatively
24. In summary Significant increases in number of women in business and in leadership and management roles.
Research examined relationship of sex, gender and style.
Gender role a more important aspect on leader emergence than biological sex.
Individuals characterized as masculine or androgynous more likely to emerge as a leader
25. In summary Introduction of leader style complicates the issue further
Leader style influenced by gender characteristics as well as context.