1 / 46

5.3. Kelvin wave in General Circulation Models

5.3. Kelvin wave in General Circulation Models. Katherine Straub. n=1 WIG. Kelvin. n=1 ER. MJO. Zonal wavenumber-frequency power spectrum of tropical OLR data, 1979-2001.

avari
Download Presentation

5.3. Kelvin wave in General Circulation Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 5.3. Kelvin wave in General Circulation Models Katherine Straub

  2. n=1 WIG Kelvin n=1 ER MJO Zonal wavenumber-frequency power spectrum of tropical OLR data, 1979-2001 This plot shows the spectral power in observed tropical OLR that exists above a smoothed red noise background spectrum. The solid lines are dispersion curves for wave modes with equivalent depths of 8, 25, and 90 m, or Kelvin wave phase speeds of 9, 16, and 30 m s-1. Based on Wheeler and Kiladis (1999), Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  3. n=1 WIG Kelvin n=1 ER MJO Zonal wavenumber-frequency power spectrum of tropical precipitation data, 1998-2007 This plot shows the spectral power in observed tropical precipitation (TRMM 3G68) that exists above a smoothed red noise background spectrum. Kelvin waves are still present at the same range of shallow equivalent depths. Very similar to Cho et al. (2004), Journal of Climate

  4. Do global models have Kelvin waves? • Data: Output from 21 global models run for the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) • “Climate of the 20th Century” model runs (1961-2000) are analyzed for Kelvin waves • Wavenumber-frequency power spectrum of precipitation is calculated for each model • This study is similar to Lin et al. (2006), but with the goal of studying Kelvin waves rather than intraseasonal variability

  5. 21 models analyzed for Kelvin waves

  6. Straight lines represent equivalent depths of 8, 25, and 90 m, orKWphase speeds of 9, 16, and 30 m s-1 precipitation averaged 5S-5N Example: Model with strong KW variability

  7. Straight lines represent equivalent depths of 8, 25, and 90 m, or KWphase speeds of 9, 16, and 30 m s-1 precipitation averaged 5S-5N Example: Model with no KW variability

  8. Rainfall Power Spectra, IPCC AR4 Intercomparison 15S-15N, (Symmetric) Observations from Lin et al., 2006

  9. Rainfall Power Spectra, IPCC AR4 Intercomparison 15S-15N, (Symmetric) from Lin et al., 2006

  10. Rainfall Spectra/Backgr, IPCC AR4 Intercomparison 15S-15N, (Symmetric) Observations from Lin et al., 2006

  11. Rainfall Spectra/Backgr, IPCC AR4 Intercomparison 15S-15N, (Symmetric) from Lin et al., 2006

  12. Models with KW variability • Of the 21 models analyzed, 8 have reasonable-looking KW spectra: • CCSR, Japan (MIROC) • GISS-AOM, USA • GISS-EH, USA • GISS-ER, USA • IPSL, France • MIUB, Germany (ECHO) • MPI, Germany (ECHAM5) • MRI, Japan

  13. CCSR, Japan GISS-AOM, USA GISS-ER, USA GISS-EH, USA Models with KW variability

  14. IPSL, France MIUB, Germany MRI, Japan MPI, Germany Models with KW variability

  15. Models with little KW variability BCCR, Norway CCCM63, Canada CNRM, France CCCM47, Canada

  16. Models with little KW variability CSIRO3, Australia CSIRO3.5, Australia GFDL2.1, USA GFDL2, USA

  17. Models with little KW variability IAP, China INGV, Italy NCAR-CCSM3, USA INM, Russia

  18. Models with little KW variability NCAR-PCM, USA

  19. What do model KWs look like? • How do model KWs compare to observations? • Does the existence of a “good” KW spectral signature ensure the existence of realistic-looking waves?

  20. Filters used to isolate KWs in precipitation datasets Faster filter used for 3 GISS, IPSL, MRI (equivalent depths 12-150 m) Slower filter used for CCSR, MIUB, MPI (equivalent depths 4-60 m)

  21. Models with realistic KW distributions (MJJAS) OLR - observations CCSR, Japan MIUB, Germany MPI, Germany

  22. Models with less realistic KW distributions OLR - observations GISS-AOM, USA GISS-EH, USA GISS-ER, USA

  23. Models with less realistic KW distributions OLR - observations IPSL, France MRI, Japan

  24. KW structure analysis: Methodology • Regress 40 years of daily 3-D model grids (1961-2000) onto KW filtered precipitation data at point of maximum variance during NH summer (MJJAS)

  25. CCSR OLR MPI 12 m s-1 MIUB 11 m s-1 14 m s-1 11 m s-1 Precipitation scale and propagation speed: PAC Observations Models

  26. GISS-AOM GISS-ER OLR 20 m s-1 14 m s-1 MRI GISS-EH 14 m s-1 22 m s-1 21 m s-1 Precipitation scale and propagation speed: PAC Observations Models

  27. OLR IPSL 14 m s-1 18 m s-1 Precipitation scale and propagation speed: PAC Observations Models

  28. OLR (red: increased cloudiness); ECMWF 1000-hPa u, v (vectors), z (contours) What do observed KWs look like? • OLR centered to north of equator, along ITCZ • Dynamical signals centered on equator • Winds are primarily zonal • Convergence to east of low OLR • Westerlies in phase with low OLR

  29. What do model KWs look like? CCSR MIUB MPI Precipitation (shading); 1000-hPa u, v (vectors); SLP (contours)

  30. What do model KWs look like? MRI Precipitation (shading); 1000-hPa u, v (vectors); SLP (contours)

  31. What do model KWs look like? GISS-AOM GISS-EH GISS-ER Precipitation (shading); 1000-hPa u, v (vectors); SLP (contours)

  32. Observed KWs: Upper troposphere H L H L OLR (shading); ECMWF 200-hPa u, v (vectors), streamfunction (contours) • Divergence collocated with/to the west of lowest OLR • Zonal winds near equator • Rotational circulations off of equator

  33. Model KWs: Upper troposphere L CCSR H L H L MIUB H L H L MPI H L Precipitation (shading); 200-hPa u, v (vectors); streamfunction (contours)

  34. L L Model KWs: Upper troposphere H MRI Precipitation (shading); 200-hPa u, v (vectors); streamfunction (contours)

  35. Model KWs: Upper troposphere GISS-AOM L H L GISS-EH L H GISS-ER L H L Precipitation (shading); 200-hPa u, v (vectors); streamfunction (contours)

  36. Observed KWs: Vertical structure, T Wave Motion Temperature at Majuro (radiosonde, 7N, 171E)

  37. Model KWs: Vertical structure, T MIUB CCSR MPI

  38. Model KWs: Vertical structure, T GISS-AOM GISS-EH GISS-ER MRI

  39. Observed KWs: Vertical structure, q Wave Motion Specific humidity at Majuro (radiosonde, 7N, 171E)

  40. Model KWs: Vertical structure, q CCSR MIUB MPI

  41. Model KWs: Vertical structure, q GISS-AOM GISS-EH GISS-ER MRI

  42. Conclusions • Of 21 models analyzed, 3 reasonably simulate convectively coupled Kelvin waves • Common features: • Slow phase speed • Maximum wave activity in Pacific ITCZ, equatorial Indian Ocean • Realistic amplitude of SLP anomalies relative to precipitation • Upper-level rotational signals in both hemispheres • Second vertical mode temperature structure • Significant cooling and drying following precipitation • The existence of a reasonable-looking precipitation spectrum does not guarantee the existence of reasonable-looking Kelvin waves

  43. Summary and Final comments • KWs described by shallow water theory (Matsuno, 1966). • KWs couple the dynamical circulations to regions of enhanced tropical cloudiness and rainfall. • Convectively coupled KWs are ubiquitous in observational data of the tropical atmosphere: • The western Pacific (Straub and Kiladis 2002) • The Atlantic ITCZ (Wang and Fu 2007) • Africa (Mounier et al. 2007; Mekonnen et al. 2008; Nguyen and Duvel 2008) • The Indian Ocean (Roundy 2008) • South America (Liebmann et al. 2009)

  44. Summary and Final comments • The coupled signal of a KW moves eastward at 10-20 m/s along the ITCZ, with a zonal wavelength of 3000-6000 km. • Wind are primarily zonal near the equator. • Geopotential height and zonal wind are in phase at the surface. • Surface convergence and increased low-level moisture lead the enhanced cloudiness and precipitation in the wave by 1/8 to ¼ wavelength. • Upper-tropospheric divergence is in phase with high cloudiness and precipitation. • The large-scale eastward-moving envelope of cloudiness typically consists to smaller-scale, westward-moving cloud clusters. • The predominant mode of cloudiness in the wave tends to progress from shallow to deep convective to stratiform clouds.

  45. Summary and Final comments • Kiladis et al. (2009) suggest the possibility of a unified theory for convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) for their dynamics and coupling mechanism. • GCMs typically found deficient in simulating CCEWs (Lin et al. 2006). • Given KW has the strongest spectral peak, and the importance of CCEWs in explaining the observed variability of tropical rainfall, it is of interest to fully understand and explore their representation in GCMs.

  46. Summary and Final comments • From 21 GCMs, less than half contain and spectral peak in precipitation in the KW band. • From these with spectral peak, only 3 reasonably simulate the geographical distribution and 3D structure of the waves. • The most commonality among these 3 models is the convective parameterization: • Tiedtke (1989) modified by Nordeng (1994) in MPI and MIUB • Pan and Randall (1998) in CCSR • Suggest that a model parameterization plays a crucial role in its ability to organize tropical convection into wave-like disturbances.

More Related