1 / 42

Mathematical Models of Love & Happiness

Mathematical Models of Love & Happiness. J. C. Sprott Department of Physics University of Wisconsin - Madison Presented to the UW-Madison Math Club in Madison, Wisconsin on October 21, 2002. Disclaimers. It’s Strogatz’ fault. This is not serious psychology. The Mathematics.

avari
Download Presentation

Mathematical Models of Love & Happiness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mathematical Models of Love & Happiness J. C. Sprott Department of Physics University of Wisconsin - Madison Presented to the UW-Madison Math Club in Madison, Wisconsin on October 21, 2002

  2. Disclaimers It’s Strogatz’ fault This is not serious psychology

  3. The Mathematics R is Romeo’s love for Juliet (or hate if negative) J is Juliet’s love for Romeo The simplest linear model is dR/dt = aR + bJ a and b describe Romeo’s “Romantic Style”

  4. Some “Romantic Styles” dR/dt = aR + bJ • a=0 (out of touch with own feelings) • b=0 (oblivious to other’s feelings) • a>0, b>0 (eager beaver) • a>0, b<0 (narcissistic nerd) • a<0, b>0 (cautious lover) • a<0, b<0 (hermit)

  5. What about Juliet? She has her own style dJ/dt = cR + dJ 4 parameters with 3 choices for each gives 81 different romantic pairings

  6. Both out of touch with their own feelings 0 • dR/dt = aR + bJ • dJ/dt = cR + dJ • Four subclasses: • b > 0, c > 0 (mutual love fest or war) • b > 0, c < 0 (never-ending cycle) • b < 0, c > 0 (never-ending cycle) • b < 0, c < 0 (unrequited love) 0

  7. Out of touch with their own feelings (continued) b > 0, c > 0 b < 0, c < 0 b > 0, c < 0 War Two lovers Love fest (or war) Two nerds Unrequited love Nerd + lover Never-ending cycle

  8. With Self-Awarenessand bc < 0 (nerd + lover) a + d < -2|bc|1/2 a + d < 0 a + d > 0 Extremely cautious Rapid apathy Somewhat cautious Eventual apathy Overly eager Growing volatility (The only equilibrium is apathy)

  9. Fire and Water(Do opposites attract?) • Take c = -b and d = -a • Result depends on a, c, and the initial conditions • Can end up in any quadrant • Or with a steady oscillation • But never apathy

  10. Peas in a Pod(Are clones bored or blissful?) • Take c = b and d = a • Result depends on a, b, and the initial conditions • Can end up in any quadrant • Or at the origin (boredom) • But no oscillations

  11. Romeo the Robot(How does Juliet react?) • Take a = b = 0 (dR/dt = 0) • dJ/dt = cR + dJ • There is an equilibrium at J = -cR/d • Can be either love or hate depending on signs of R, c, and d • Stable if d < 0, unstable if d > 0 • Her feelings never die • No oscillations are possible

  12. A Love Triangle • Romeo has a mistress, Guinevere • Guinevere and Juliet don’t know about one another • Romeo responds to each with the same romantic style (same a and b) • Guinevere’s hate has the same effect on his feelings for Juliet as does Juliet’s love, and vice versa

  13. Love Triangle Equations • dRJ/dt = aRJ + b(J - G) • dJ/dt = cRJ + dJ • dRG/dt = aRG + b(G - J) • dG/dt = eRG + fG • System is 4D (4 variables) • There are 6 parameters • System is linear (no chaos)

  14. Love Triangle Examples

  15. Romeo’s Fate • Averaged over all romantic styles (64 combinations of parameters) and 64 initial conditions: • 37% loves Juliet & hates Guinevere • 37% loves Guinevere & hates Juliet • 6% loves both (2% everyone in love) • 6% hates both (2% everyone in hate) • 14% apathy (10% everyone apathetic) • Anything can happen!

  16. Effect of Nonlinearities Replace ax with ax(1-|x|) (logistic function) ax(1 - |x|) ax x

  17. New kinds of Dynamics New equilibrium points Limit cycles (but no chaos in 2D)

  18. One Chaotic Solution of Nonlinear Love Triangle “Strange attractor of love”

  19. dR/dt = aR + bJ dJ/dt = cR + dJ d2R/dt2 + bdR/dt + w2R = 0 b = -a - d (damping) w2= ad - bc (frequency) Simple 2D Linear Model

  20. Solutions of 2-D Linear System Time

  21. Happiness Model • d2x/dt2 + bdx/dt + w2x = F(t) • Happiness: H = dx/dt • Habituation • Acclimation • Adaptation • Only changes are perceived Damping Oscillation External forces

  22. What is x? • x = integral of H • x is what others perceive • In the love model x is what the other feels • H (your happiness) must average to zero (with positive damping) • x does not average to zero

  23. Winning the Lottery

  24. Drug or Other Addiction

  25. Intermittent Reinforcement

  26. Random Events

  27. Real Life

  28. Parameter Space b w 2

  29. Nonlinearities • There are many possibilities. • Try bdx/dt --> b(1 - x2)dx/dt • This gives growth for small x and damping for large x. • The resulting equation was studied by van der Pol (1926). • Oscillations occur even without an external force. • It has been used to model a variety of nonlinear oscillators.

  30. Bipolar Behavior

  31. Periodically Driven Chaos

  32. Happiness Attractor

  33. Autonomous Chaos

  34. Happiness Attractor #2

  35. Some Implications • Constant happiness is an unrealistic goal. • Others see less volatility in you and often wrongly conclude how you feel. • Individuals can be categorized by their values of b and w. • Bipolar disorders may correspond to negative or small b. • Long prison terms may be ineffective.

  36. Some other happiness studies • Brickman, Coates & Janoff-Bulman (1978) report only small differences in life satisfaction between paraplegics, control subjects, and lottery winners. • Lykken (1981) reports that religious people are not noticeably happier than freethinkers. • Diener & Diener (1996) review studies indicating that all American socioeconomic groups score above neutral in life satisfaction, as do people with severe disabilities.

  37. Studies involving disabilities • Hellmich (1995) reports that 84% of individuals with extreme quadriplegia say that their life is average or above average. • Delespaul & DeVries (1987) report that people with chronic mental problems claim positive well-being.

  38. Studies of the dynamics • Silver (1982) reports that individuals with spinal cord injuries are very unhappy immediately following their injury, but that 58% state that happiness is their strongest emotion by the third week after their injuries. • Suh, Diener, & Fujita (1996) report that good and bad events have almost no effect on happiness after 6 months.

  39. In Summary ...(Lykken 1999) • There seem to be no permanent ups and downs; natural selection has made us this way, because, by accommodating to both adversity and to good fortune in this fashion, we remain more productive, more adaptable to changing circumstances, and more likely to have viable offspring.

  40. Other Similar Qualities • Sense of wealth • Health • Beauty • Intelligence • Spirituality • Skills • Senses • hot/cold • smell • vision • hearing ...

  41. Summary • Love and happiness are wonderful • So is mathematics

  42. http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/ lectures/love&hap/ (This talk) Steven H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Addison-Wesley, 1994) sprott@physics.wisc.edu Collaborations are welcome! References

More Related