1 / 10

NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting Munich, 3.12.2004

NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting Munich, 3.12.2004. Achim Autenrieth Siemens AG. Agenda. 9:30 – 9:45 Introduction & Agenda bashing 9:45 - 11:00 Presentation of partners on current work and work planned in Year 2 11:00 - 11:30 Coffee break

avariella-king
Download Presentation

NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting Munich, 3.12.2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting Munich, 3.12.2004 Achim Autenrieth Siemens AG NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  2. Agenda 9:30 – 9:45 Introduction & Agenda bashing 9:45 - 11:00 Presentation of partners on current work and work planned in Year 2 11:00 - 11:30 Coffee break 11:30 - 13:00 Presentation of partners on current work and work planned in Year 2 (cont'd) 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch break 14:00 - 15:30 Definition of Study Groups (or Sub-Activities) 15:30 - 16:00 Coffee break 16:00 - 16:45 Definition of joint work in Year 2 (Case studies, simulation tools, ...) if possible /needed , this could be split in two separate tracks 16:45 - 17:00 Summary of Results, definition of Deadlines and Action Points + a.o.b NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  3. Partners/Participants/Presentations • Telenor (Håkon Lønsethagen)  • IMEC (Didier Colle, Leen Depré) • Politecnico of Milano (Filippo Renga)  • Siemens (Achim Autenrieth, Andreas Iselt) • T-Systems (Ralf Hülsermann) • UPC (Salvatore Spadaro) • AGH (Krzysztof Wajda) • Telecom Italia LAB (Giuseppe Ferraris), • BUTE (Tibor Cinkler, János Tapolcai) • Marconi (Marc Barry) remote: • FT (Benoit Lemoine) • ACIT (Nicolas Le Sauze) • TID (Maria L. Garcia) NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  4. Activity Meeting • Goals • Each Partner gives a short presentation of intended studies and simulations (max. 10-15 minutes, max 6 slides) • Study Topics: Layer(s), Network Model, Recovery mechanisms, MS/ML/MD, … • Type of studies: theoretical studies / simulations • Used tools, input parameters, output parameters, expected results • Definition of Study Groups • focused on on specific study topic • max 3 to 5 partners per study group • limited number of study groups per partner (max 2 or 3) • Definition of planned work for year 2 • Definition / Revision of D27 ToC NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  5. Overview of Topics • Overview of Resilience Mechanisms and Advanced Resilience Topics (e.g. MPLS FRR, RPR, ASTN shared rest.) • Quality of Resilience • MultiService Resilience (MS) • MultiLayer Resilience (ML) • MultiDomain and Multiprovider Resilience (MD,MP) • Combinations (MS-ML, MS-MD, ML-MD, MS-ML-MD) • … • Case Studies and Results • Reference Network & Network Model (e.g. from COST) • Description of Case Studies • Discussion of Results NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  6. Stucture of Work in A2.1 for D27 • D27: Main part of deliverable: Description of innovative Results of case studies on MMM TE and Resilience • Annex: Internal reports with description of case studies, prepared/submitted/accepted publications in journals / conferences / workshops • Technical Approach • Start work on different topics in small groups (task forces) • Perform joint theoretical studies and simulation case studies • Prepare joint publications and (more detailed) internal reports • Paste publications / internal documents to annex of D27 • Prepare integrated document which highlights main innovations, results and NOBEL resilience guidelines with references to detailed case studies in annex (M20 - M22) NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  7. Open questions • Who is working on different topics(General, MS, ML, MD, MS-ML, MS-MD, ML-MD, MS-ML-MD) • joint case studies? study groups? • Simulation studies • Which simulation tools (one per partner? parsers between file formats) • Which network model (Overlay, Peer, Augmented) • depends on case study • Which reference networks (NOBEL WP1, COST 239, COST 266, NoE ePhoton/ONe) • setup of a set of reference networks • Which traffic model (static, dynamic, parameters) • … NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  8. Next steps • Partners in each SG agree on studied concepts, reference networks, network models, traffic models, simulation tools, etc. (Dec. 04 / Jan. 05) • Each Study Group prepares a short internal document / presentation describing their concepts and intended case studies (2 to 5 pages / slides) (Jan. 05) • SG perform their studies and evaluate the concepts (Feb. to Jul. 05) • Goal of each SG should be joint publication(s) to a journal or conference (e.g. DRCN 2005) (May to Aug. 05) • Results of case studies, internal documents and publications are prepared until Aug. 05 and added to Annex of D27 • Key results and general guidelines derived from the case studies are presented in main part of deliverable (Sep./Oct. 05) NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  9. Task: Definition of Study Groups • Starting point: • structure as defined in draft D27 ToC • Open questions: • Is the structure sufficient? • Are some sections unbalanced and should they be split? • Are some topics not or not well covered by the structure? NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

  10. Action Points NOBEL WP2.1 Meeting, Munich,3December 2004

More Related