1 / 18

Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis

Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis. Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007. Ratio Analysis

Download Presentation

Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007

  2. Ratio Analysis A tool used to conduct a quantitative analysis of information. Ratios are calculated from current year numbers and are then compared to previous years, other organizations, the industry, or even the economy to judge the performance of the organization. Ratio analysis is predominately used by proponents of fundamental analysis.

  3. New Ways of Measuring Collections • The ARL Task Force on New Ways of Measuring Collections was established in December, 2004 and charged with identifying relevant issues and proposing changes on how ARL should be measuring research library collections. • More than 100 ARL directors were interviewed in early 2005. Some directors felt ratio analysis would help offset the traditional measures in which “bigger was better.” • A recent article shows that the top fifteen liberal arts colleges libraries spend an average of $2,077 per FTE while the 216 liberal arts colleges reporting to NCES average $633 per FTE and the 3,700 academic libraries reporting to NCES average $386 per FTE.* (The 112 ARL libraries range from $2800 to $188 per FTE) • Do we currently have meaningful ways to use ratio analysis to effectively describe our expenditures for collections? *D. Yvonne Jones, “How Much Do the “Best” Colleges Spend on Libraries? Using College Rankings to Provide Library Financial Benchmarks” College and Research Libraries (July , 2007)

  4. Generating Ratios Using ARL Statistics

  5. UConn’s current ARL ratios: To actually spend this much per capita would require $24.6 million

  6. Another Look at the Facts UConnMainLawHealth Center Materials Expenses $8.2 m $5.34m $1.25 m $1.61 m # of Faculty 1,541 1,098 45 398 # of Undergraduates 21,664 21,664 ------ -------- # of Graduate Students 4,130 2,909 736 485

  7. One of the ACRL Standards’ suggested points of comparison for input measures is: Ratio of material/information resource expenditures Combined total of student and faculty FTE All UConn Libraries = $8.2 million = $300 27,335 UConn Main Library = $5.34 million = $208 25,671 UConn Health Center = $1.61 million = $1,823 883 UConn Law Library = $1.25 million = $1,600 781

  8. Towards Meaningful Ratio Analysis At the main library, library user surveys have determined that library materials (all formats combined) are actually used as follows: % of use% of $per capita Undergraduates 40% $2.14m $99 Graduate Students 51% $2.72m $936 Faculty 5% $267,000 $243 All Other Users 4% $214,000 $200 This calculation truly reflects $5.34 million in materials expenses at the main library.

  9. Incorporating User Survey Data At UConn’s main library, user surveys have demonstrated that library materials are actually used as follows, by format: Print Electronic Other BooksJournalsResourcesMaterials Undergraduates 34% 36% 28% 39% Graduate Students 52% 53% 35% 53% Faculty 9% 5% 28% 4% Other Users 5% 6% 8% 4%

  10. Per Capita Expenses by Format – Main Library Print Electronic OtherPer Capita BooksJournalsResources MaterialsExpenses Undergraduates $14 $16 $40 $7$77 Graduate Students $154 $174 $566 $75$969 Faculty $71 $43 $113 $15$242

  11. Towards Meaningful Ratio Analysis At the UConn Health Center library, user surveys have determined that library materials (all formats combined) are actually used as follows: % of use$ as a %per capita Graduate Students 49% $789,000 $1,627 Faculty 41% $660,000 $1,658 All Other Users 10% $161,000 $1,642 This calculation truly reflects $1.61 million in materials expenditures at the Health Center Library

  12. Incorporating User Survey Data At the UConn Health Center Library, user surveys have determined that library materials are actually used as follows, by format: Print Electronic Other BooksJournalsResourcesMaterials Graduate Students 57% 40% 35% 49% Faculty 36% 46% 54% 41% Other Users 7% 14% 11% 10%

  13. Per Capita Expenses by Format – Medical Library Print Electronic Other Per Capita BooksJournalsResourcesMaterialsExpenses Graduate Students $170 $720 $410 $32$1,332 Faculty$131 $1,009 $771 $32$1,943

  14. Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis ARL by Total Materials Total Materials Expenses ARL Library ACRL Materials Use by RatioRatioRatioUse RatioFormat Ratio All UConn Libraries Per Undergraduate $378 Per Graduate Student $1,985 Per Faculty Member $5,321 Students and Faculty $300 UConn Main Library Per Undergraduate $246 $99 $77 Per Graduate Student $1,836 $936 $969 Per Faculty Member $4,863 $243 $242 Students and Faculty $208 UConn Medical Library Per Graduate Student $3,320 $1,627 $1,332 Per Faculty Member $4,045 $1,658 $1,943 Students and Faculty $1,823 UConn Law Library Per Graduate Student $1,698 Per Faculty Member $27,778 Students and Faculty$1,600

  15. Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis If Libraries were to use ratio analysis to measure collections expenditures per capita: • The combined cost of each materials expenditures ratio for a library (e.g., undergraduates, faculty, and graduate students) should total that library’s total expenditures for materials. • Grouping different types of libraries together into an institutional ratio leads to very different ratios than looking at individual libraries separately. • Identifying materials usage by user group by library gives more accurate ratios of materials expenses per capita than the other approached I identified.

  16. This presentation is available at: www.lib.uconn.edu/~bfranklin

More Related