1 / 26

Infection as a treatable cause for asthma- Where do we go from here?

Workshop - September 2012. Infection as a treatable cause for asthma- Where do we go from here?. David L Hahn, MD MS. Conflict of interest disclosure. I have no conflicts of interest that relate to this presentation. Agenda.

ave
Download Presentation

Infection as a treatable cause for asthma- Where do we go from here?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop - September 2012 Infection as a treatable cause for asthma- Where do we go from here? David L Hahn, MD MS

  2. Conflict of interest disclosure • I have no conflicts of interest that relate to this presentation

  3. Agenda • Goal or purpose: Looking towards the future of research into azithromycin as a novel treatment for asthma • Aim#1: Brief background of rationale and research to date • Aim#2: Open discussion about your perspectives of the possible role(s) for PBRN research

  4. Background • Current asthma treatments are palliative, not curative • Anti-inflammatory treatments • Despite treatment, half of patients have uncontrolled asthma • Demoly et al 2010

  5. Asthma Control Test (ACT)

  6. Asthma Control in Five European Countries Not Well Controlled (ACT≤19) • More activity limitations (40.8% vs 1.5%) • More breathlessness ≥3 times weekly (72.5% vs 5.4%) • More sleep difficulties ≥1 times weekly (60.3% vs 4.6%) • More rescue medication ≥2-3 times weekly (77.4% vs 15.9%) • More healthcare utilization (17.4% vs 9.9%) • More absenteeism (12.2% vs 5.5%) • More work impairment (30.0% vs 15.4%) • Decreased quality-of-life (P<.001) Compared to Controlled (ACT≥20) Demoly et al. Update on asthma control in five European countries. Eur Respir Rev 2010

  7. Lack of Asthma Control is Common Asthma prevalence = 6.1% (France,Germany, Italy, Spain and UK, 2008) All asthma Treated asthma Demoly et al. Update on asthma control in five European countries. Eur Respir Rev 2010

  8. Background • A subset of asthma (20%) progresses to COPD • Increasing the burden of morbidity and mortality • Preventive and curative treatments are desirable

  9. Macrolides for asthma • Growing interest in second generation macrolides/azalides for asthma • To offer greater control • Possibly preventive or curative • Unresolved debate about mechanisms • Anti-inflammatory v antimicrobial (atypicals) • 10 trials published: mixed results • Methodologic limitations • Small, short-term, different drug/duration, no post-treatment observation period, disease-oriented outcomes, limited external validity (poor generalizability)

  10. Macrolides for asthma • Growing interest in second generation macrolides/azalides for asthma • To offer greater control • Possibly preventive or curative • Unresolved debate about mechanisms • Anti-inflammatory v antimicrobial (atypicals) • 10 trials published: mixed results • Methodologic limitations • Small, short-term, different drug/duration, no post-treatment observation period, disease-oriented outcomes, limited external validity (poor generalizability)

  11. Guideline treatment trials: Lacking external validity The proportion of people with asthma eligible for the major RCTs (n=17) cited in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. • Current asthma • Current asthma on treatment Travers et al. External validity of randomised controlled trials in asthma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?. Thorax 2007;62:219-223

  12. Guideline treatment trials: Lacking external validity Typical exclusions: • Comorbidity • FEV1 not 50-85 %predicted • ≤12% reversibility • Current smoking • Past hx >10 pack years Additional exclusions: • Being asymptomatic • No regular use of ICS Herland et al. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger “real life” population of patients with obstructive lung disease?. Respiratory Med 2005; 99:11-19

  13. Generalizable studies of macrolides in asthma are limited • Two prospective observational (before-after) trials • Hahn JFP 1995 • Hahn et al. PLoS ONE 2012 • Two randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) • Hahn et al, PLoS Clinical Trials 2006 • Hahn et al. JABFM 2012

  14. Treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in adult asthma: a before-after trial. J Fam Pract 1995; 41:345-351 Of 46 patients with moderate to severe stable asthma symptoms, 25 (54%) had PFT and clinically confirmed persisting improvement: • Prior acute C. pneumoniae* 4/4: complete response o Possible chronic C. pneumoniae* 21/42: 3 complete response 18 major improvement Positive response assoc w/ Less disease duration (P=.01) Less fixed obstruction (P<.01) * Dots represent multiple measures for individuals

  15. Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific IgE is prevalent in asthma and is associated with disease severity. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e35945. Of 66 uncontrolled asthma patients: • 33 (50%) were Cp-IgE+ • 16 (24%) were Cp-PCR+ 39/66 elected azithromycin Rx. Of those 39: • 33 (85%) reported lasting improvement • No association with IgE status *P=0.002, **P<0.0001

  16. Secondary outcomes of a pilot randomized trial of azithromycin treatment for asthma. PLoS Clin Trials 2006; 1:e11 • 45 patients with mostly mild to moderate persistent asthma symptoms: • Baseline Cp IgA antibodies predicted worsening asthma symptoms at end study (P=.04) • Symptom improvement attributable to AZ was 28% in high IgA v 12% in low IgA subjects (interaction P=0.27) • • Binary measure for improvement (≥1 unit increased AQLQ and/or ≥50% decreased rescue BD) was: • 53% AZ v 13% PLA (P=0.03) • NNT=3 * *P=0.04 by linear regression analysis

  17. Azithromycin for bronchial asthma in adults: An effectiveness trial. J Am Bd Fam Med 2012; 25:442-459 • 97 subjects enrolled • 3 months Rx, 9 months post-Rx observation • Open-label cohort, n = 22 (23%) • Declined randomization after learning of a 50% chance of receiving placebo • IRB approval for an open-label (OL) observational arm • More severe asthma than randomized subjects

  18. Asthma severity

  19. Asthma Symptoms (5-point scale)

  20. AQL: Asthma Quality of Life (Juniper)

  21. Asthma Control (Juniper)

  22. Change From Baseline in AQL 48 Weeks Post-Enrolment

  23. Summary • Randomized trial was negative • Underpowered (Potential NNT=7) • Open-label subjects reported significant prolonged benefit compared to placebo group • NNT = 2-3 for AQL improvement ≥ 2 units at one year

  24. Unanswered questions • Are the open label results spurious, or did these subjects correctly self-identify themselves as good candidates? • Was the RCT biased towards a null effect due to self- exclusion of subjects most likely to benefit? • Results support further azithromycin trials

  25. Open for Discussion • What kinds of asthma? • What study designs? • What role for PBRNs?

  26. What kinds of asthma? • New-Onset • Well-controlled • Uncontrolled and/or treatment resistant (refractory) What study designs? • Before-After (Registries) • RCTs • Including large simple trials

More Related