1 / 7

Overview of PARIMA/LEWS Collaboration 2001-2003

Overview of PARIMA/LEWS Collaboration 2001-2003. First Component: Livestock Offtake Second Component: Spatial Analysis. LEWS: Livestock Early Warning. LEWS is also funded by GL-CRSP Led by Texas A&M University, U.S.A.

avedis
Download Presentation

Overview of PARIMA/LEWS Collaboration 2001-2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of PARIMA/LEWS Collaboration 2001-2003 First Component: Livestock Offtake Second Component: Spatial Analysis

  2. LEWS: Livestock Early Warning • LEWS is also funded by GL-CRSP • Led by Texas A&M University, U.S.A. • LEWS investigates possible early warning predictors for livestock condition, range condition, and rainfall to encourage timely sales

  3. Question and Objective • Question: How to convert a larger share of pastoral livestock mortality into sales to better conserve wealth? • Objective: Identify feasible interventions that might induce more sales at early stages of drought

  4. Two Inter-related Issues • What factors limit livestock off-take during stress periods ? • What interventions might foster more responsive livestock off-take under today’s conditions of increased system stress?

  5. Alternative Hypotheses • Lack of information? (no information on prices, animal or range condition, -- also due to lack of communications) • Complex ownership rights? (hard to sell your father’s animal even if you need to) • Low prices (poor market power) • Poor infrastructure and high insecurity

  6. Hypotheses, continued • No need or alternative use for money (let them die) • Stock too valuable to sell early and replace later (gamble I will survive until the next rains come, so hang on and hope for the best result) • Tenurial regimes a problem (if I sell I lose access to grazing and water resources) • Cross-border policy constraints and quarantines severely limit trade

  7. Break-Out Groups • Based on your experience and logic, which hypotheses do you feel explain the low off-take from pastoral systems? What then is your priority intervention? • Your group needs to rank your top 3 hypotheses (#1 the strongest, #2 next strongest, and #3 next strongest)

More Related