120 likes | 334 Views
Journey from Service Provider to Infrastructure Player. UKNOF43 April 19. Richard Shaw. About me. Richard Shaw Lead Engineer – Network Operations. Our journey so far. Our infrastructure build approach so far. Based on existing customers and prospect data
E N D
Journey from Service Provider to Infrastructure Player UKNOF43 April 19 Richard Shaw
About me • Richard Shaw • Lead Engineer – Network Operations
Our infrastructure build approach so far • Based on existing customers and prospect data • Skewed to residential and small business • 400 exchanges that gives us ~55% FTTxcoverage • Another 50 being unbundled which gets us to >65% coverage • Of those 400, 275 have EAD based services live 400 live 50 live Q2
Some interesting side effects • Most of Manchester & surrounding areas are very well covered • Very few exchanges in Birmingham <1Gbps >1Gbps >10Gbps
Our current network architecture • ‘Flat’ L2 between Exchange and Core • Multi-vendor Core/Agg/BNG/LNS makes life a bit ‘interesting’ • Two main core sites – London and Manchester • Our current issues: • Scaling is difficult • Mixing traffic types is very hard • Capacity has to be managed on always ensuring enough headroom (although that means everyone ‘never loses a packet’) • No ability to use multiple backhauls from exchange to balance traffic • Caching and other network functions have to happen in the core • All traffic either goes to London or Manchester, even if it’s destined for the ‘exchange next door’ Openreach Exchange ADVA GE114 L2 Backhaul GEA EAD Juniper EX2200 Core Site 1 Core Site 2 EG-X orNE20 EG-X orNE20 Service Termination Service Termination
Traffic Growth prediction for Zen Usage increase plus the move to 1Gbps then 10Gbps tails as Openreach continues to drive EAD prices down ‘Triple Whammy’ effect of bearer speed, extra usage and more circuits Copper decline plus influence of FTTP rollout
Forward look of Infrastructure • More based on future demands and customers • Significant focus on our partners and wholesale customers’ needs rather than just our existing customers • Need for local off-load of popular content (YouTube/Netflix etc.) meaning flat L2 no longer cuts the grade • Triple whammy of more customers plus more bandwidth for those customers plus more coverage • Leads to….. • New architecture needed to manage traffic • Significant jump in core and aggregation bandwidth • Significant jump in edge, transit and BNG capacity
A 2025 capable infrastructure High level principles • Carrier Grade Availability • Industry Alignment (TMForumeTOM/TOGAF & MPLS/E-VPN/E-LAN) • Interoperability • High/Total Automation • Extensible/Scalable design (no ‘horizontal scaling’ – it doesn’t work) • Secure by Design
Our goals 2021 • 700 exchanges giving 80%+ coverage • 5Tbps core network • 2Tbps of Peering and Transit • 3Tbps of BNG capacity • 2Tbps of Ethernet capacity • 10 nx10Gbps metro rings 2025 (maybe…) • 987 exchanges giving 100% coverage • 25Tbps core network • 10Tbps of Peering and Transit • 15Tbps of BNG capacity • 10Tbps of Ethernet capacity • 50 nx100Gbps metro rings