330 likes | 443 Views
Session 5 | Market Segments. What Generates Performance: The Market, Location, and Property Features. Presented by: Serguei Chervachidze , Capital Markets Economist Gleb Nechayev , Senior Managing Economist.
E N D
Session 5 | Market Segments What Generates Performance: The Market, Location, and Property Features Presented by: Serguei Chervachidze, Capital Markets Economist • GlebNechayev, Senior Managing Economist
Submarket Rent Growth: Can Investors Beat the Wider Market?
The Question The residual is due to changing market forces within the Submarket that are different from the MSA
Example of Regression Analysis: OFC Eq (5): Dependent Variable: Submarket Rent Growth; Fixed Effects Panel Estimation Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
Submarket Analysis: OFC & IND Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
Submarket Analysis: MH & Hotels Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
Do These Differ by Bull/Bear Rent Phase? Note: Cyclical Structural Breaks are Identified using the Bai-Perron (2003) Structural Break Tests
Submarket Analysis by Bull/Bear Phase: OFC & IND OFC: Market Rent Effect Bull: 0.91 Under Bear: 0.94 Difference: Weakly Stat Sig, p = 0.11 Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
Submarket Analysis by Bull Bear Phase: MH & Hotels Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
Conclusions • Market rent and macro trends drive vast share of submarket performance • Submarket-unique factors that are fixed over time have very small effect on rent growth • Do property/submarket structural features matter? Not a lot! • In the down (bear) phase of the cycle, market rents have a stronger downward effect on submarket performance vs. the up (bull) phase • Remaining unexplained part of submarket performance (50% to 70%)—submarket-specific factors that are changing over time: • Local supply dynamics: building a new road; new large development • Local demand changes: Influx of high-tech firms to submarket; outflow of residents from one submarket to another • Office, Hotel, and Multifamily submarkets—highly integrated with markets • 50%-60% of submarket variation in rents explained by market variation • Industrial—little integration • Only 30% variation explained • Is warehouse different? • Homogenous property type?
How Do I Pick the “Right” Submarkets? • Step 1: Pick the right market by: • Studying the macro environment very carefully • Understanding rental fundamentals and factors that drive these fundamentals on the market level • Step 2: Within a chosen market, pick the right submarket by: • Studying and understanding factors that change on the local (submarket) level (including supply) • Do not pick a submarket solely on the basis of some fixed characteristics that do not change over time. For example: • Invest only in industrial markets only with rail-road access • Edge-of-city multifamily properties on top of hills with a good view • Office properties within 20 miles of CBD • These characteristics are responsible for a very small share of performance differences vs. the larger market over time
Property Rent Growth: How Much Does Property Characteristics and Location Matter?Cross-Section Analysis of Multi-Housing Property Performance Since 2007
Property Data Summary Source: Pierce Eislen
Cross-Section Analysis: Questions 1) How much variation in submarket rent growth can be explained by variation in: • market rent growth • submarket characteristics that don’t change (distance to downtown, submarket size, 2007 rent level relative to market) 2) How much variation in property rent growth can be explained by variation in: • market rent growth • submarket rent growth • property-specific characteristics that don’t change (age, size, number of stories, 2007 rent level relative to submarket)
Property Data Summary Source: Pierce Eislen
Market Data Summary Source: Pierce Eislen
Summary of the Results • Markets explain about 70% of variation in submarket performance and submarket characteristics that are fixed in time explain less than 5% (but all of them are statistically significant: smaller submarkets that are closer to downtown and have average higher than the market did better over 2007-2012 period) • Markets/submarkets explain about 40% of variation in rent growth across properties and property characteristics explain less than 10% (but all of them are statistically significant: smaller, older properties with lower rents relative to market, further from downtown did better over 2007-2012 period)
What About Property Investment Performance? NCREIF Building Level Data
The Question—Updated The residual is due to changing features of the individual property
Parsing Out Building-Level Returns: NCREIF OFC Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors
What’s Left To Explain? • Fixed property effects: only 20% of variation • Unlike in submarkets, these matter a lot more because investment capital pays attention to these factors • For two properties with the same rent growth, a new CBD office tower will get a lower cap rate than older suburban office park • Dynamic property effects: 53% of variation: • These are factors that are property-specific and are changing over time • Similar to dynamic submarket effects in rent studies (39% variation in office) • Property management over time is key • Signing a lease at top rates right before recession • Blend and extend • Other dynamic property effects include: • A good tenant leaving • Changes in the cost structure of the building • Changes in the immediate neighborhood of the property (a competitor tower built across the street) • These are the key elements that will help drive successful investment strategy
Fixed Effects: What Explains the 20% of OFC Investment Performance? • Stage 2 analysis: make a cross section of fixed effects from Stage 1 • We regress the fixed effects from stage one on the various property and submarket characteristics in a cross section • This shows us what drives these effects:
Stage 2: Explaining the 20%: Property/Submarket Characteristics Dependent Variable: Fixed Effects Coefficients from Stage 1; Cross-section Setup
Conclusions • Results generally in line with what we saw for rent growth analysis • The macro cycle has the strongest effect on investment performance (31% of variation): • Consistent with our research that macroeconomic/capital markets factors drive asset pricing and appreciation returns • Market rent performance still matters, but less: 13% • Time-invariant unique building effects now explain more (20%) of variation, but still not a lot • The unexplained dynamic property effects remain key (53%): • Need to manage the property with an understanding of market dynamics • Tenants, nearby competitors, and other dynamic factors matter more than property amenities • Factors that change on submarket level (e.g. demand/supply) matter more than fixed submarket characteristics • Further research is on-going: expect additional insights
So What Does It All Mean for Investing? • Study the macro/capital markets environment carefully: timing is crucial • Study market-level CRE fundamentals (rents and vacancies, demand/supply and their drivers) • Understand submarket/local/building-level dynamics: factors that are property/location/neighborhood unique and changing are the really hard part, since they are hard to measure. • Use good management to control building-level dynamics • Length of lease, CAPEX timing, etc • Do not rely solely on picking submarkets/buildings on the basis of “unique” fixed characteristics: • Edge city properties with good view, CBD high-rise properties only, etc • By picking a building at the wrong time and/or in the wrong market and/or with the wrong property/location/neighborhood dynamic will trump any investment returns advantages from getting the “right” fixed characteristics