1 / 9

SYMPOSIUM VERTIMAR-2005 VALUE CRITERIA AS A GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS

SYMPOSIUM VERTIMAR-2005 VALUE CRITERIA AS A GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS. F.J. VANACLOCHA; E. GARCÍA; A. NATERA Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Trabajo realizado en el marco del Proyecto I+D+i “Modelos de prevención, gestión y evaluación de catástrofes

aviva
Download Presentation

SYMPOSIUM VERTIMAR-2005 VALUE CRITERIA AS A GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SYMPOSIUM VERTIMAR-2005 VALUE CRITERIA AS A GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS F.J. VANACLOCHA; E. GARCÍA; A. NATERA Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Trabajo realizado en el marco del Proyecto I+D+i “Modelos de prevención, gestión y evaluación de catástrofes medioambientales en zonas costeras”, financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología

  2. CRISIS MANAGEMENT IMPACT Event CRISIS MANAGEMENT Environmental Impact Political Impact Socio-economic Impact

  3. PYRAMIDAL SCENARIO OF CRISIS MANAGEMENT Political-administrative elites Civil Society Public Opinion

  4. TWO LEVELS FOR MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS ·Operational/Instrumental Level ·Political/Communicative Level Specific, but connected, challenges linked to management priorities in each level

  5. OPERATIONAL/INSTRUMENTAL LEVEL: CHALLENGES AND MANAGEMENT PRIOTITIES • Design: Early Detection Systems. • Classification and Monitoring Risk Systems ·Crisis Prevention b) Design and Update: Contingency Plans, Action Protocols ·Crisis Preparedness c) Speeding up and Implementation: Contingency Plans, Action Protocols ·Crisis Response d) Speeding up Reconstruction Plans and Re-Design of a) and b) ·Post-Crisis

  6. POLITICAL/COMMUNICATIVE LEVEL: CHALLENGES AND MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES ·Crisis Diagnosis Making clear Collective Perceptions ·Plurality of views and interests Cutting down Conflict and boosting Participation ·Emotional Rescue Setting up a “holding environment”/ Leadership ·Legitimacy Challenge Enhancing trust in institutional responses Taking advantage of crisis: Political Profitability (PPB), and learning ·Opportunity Window Communication as (Transversal) Challenge

  7. VALUE CRITERIA Operational/Instrumental Level Concepts of Reference to Judge and Guide Crisis Management Political/Communicative Level

  8. OPERATIONALISATION OF CRISIS MANAGEMENT VALUE CRITERIA Variables/ Dimensions Value Criteria Indicators Standards Measurements Indexes

  9. CRISIS MANAGEMENT VALUE CRITERIA Operational/Instrumental Level Political/Communicative Level EFFECTIVENESS EFFECTIVENESS Effectiveness Efficiency Satisfaction SATISFACTION EFFICIENCY Accuracy Ethics ETHICS ACCURACY Resilience Participation RESILIENCE PARTICIPATION Sustainability Leadership IMPACT SUSTAINABILITY Coordination Impact Visibility COORDINATION VISIBILITY Learning LEARNING LEADERSHIP

More Related