240 likes | 290 Views
Accreditation of Medical Laboratories - Past, Present and Future. KF Wong, MD Chairman, A AB Working Party on Medical Testing. What is accreditation?. Realize ability Reach for the better Recognise limitations. Why we have to do it?. Professional standards Quality management
E N D
Accreditation of Medical Laboratories -Past, Present and Future KF Wong, MD Chairman, AAB Working Party on Medical Testing
What is accreditation? • Realize ability • Reach for the better • Recognise limitations
Why we have to do it? • Professional standards • Quality management • Recognition (by peers and public)
The old adage…. 「上醫醫未病之病、 中醫醫欲病之病、 下醫醫已病之病。」 《黃帝內經》
「上檢檢未犯之錯、 中檢檢欲犯之錯、 下檢檢已犯之錯。」 《ISO外經》 An accredited laboratory is a safe, self-regulated and saleable laboratory.
In the beginning…. • Some laboratories have already sought accreditation by overseas bodies (NATA and CAP) in the late-90’s. • NATA - National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (ISO 17025) • CAP - College of American Pathologists
Let there be light…. 2001 Policy Address, Health Services Policy Objective:“Expansion of the HOKLAS to enhance the quality of clinical pathology service. Our target is to expand the HOKLAS to cover clinical pathology laboratories in 2003.”
And there was light. • Apr 02 AABWP on medical testing (13 members) • Jun 02 6 Task Forces (Pathology disciplines) • Dec 02 MOU signed between HKAS & HKCPath • Mar 03 SARS • May 03 AABWP Chairman’s resignation • July 03 First draft of HOKLAS 015 (on ISO15189)
We talk and we argue…. • Difficulties faced • Differences recognised • Discrepancies narrowed We have the same vision – a safe and quality laboratory service for Hong Kong.
And the rest is history. • Nov 03 Categorization of laboratories (P & S) • Feb 04 HOKLAS 015 published & launched • July 04 First application • Jan 05 Bridging Scheme • Mar 05 First accreditation • Jan 06 7 laboratories accredited (HOKLAS 8) • Feb 06 4 more applications (with 11 laboratories)
The unnamed heroes • 16 pathologists (from 4 disciplines) • 16 medical laboratory scientists • 63 potential assessors • But, there are over 160 laboratories.
What have we done…. • ISO 15189 and HOKLAS 015 • 8 supplementary criteria (SC 23-30) • 2 preparatory workshops & 3 seminars • 4 assessor training courses (2003-2005) • 21 pre-application laboratory visits • 7 laboratories accredited, more will come
ISO 15189 vs ISO 17025 • Continual improvement • Laboratory and staff safety • TAT and critical/alert levels • Pre/post-examination procedures • Uncertainty of measurement It is a requirement of ISO 15189 that laboratories “shall determine the uncertainty of measurement of results, where relevant and possible”…. (5.6.2)
MU…. • Questionable practicality and usefulness in clinical laboratory (semi-quantitative results). • Clinical medicine is very complex, and is both a science and an art (subjective element). • Clinicians examine the patient, look at the trend, and make judgement on the test results.
What’s next • Further publicity of laboratory accreditation • Accreditation of proficiency testing providers • Joint assessment with overseas accreditation bodies
What do we need now? • Government support • College collaboration • Profession partnership • Public recognition/acceptance
Accreditation is hard work –let’s do it professionallyand enjoy the process.