480 likes | 616 Views
New Concepts in Pain Management. Melanie Christina, M.D. Presbyterian Hospital Dallas Medical Director, Heartland Hospice. Definition : Pain. An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage
E N D
New Concepts in PainManagement Melanie Christina, M.D. Presbyterian Hospital Dallas Medical Director, Heartland Hospice
Definition: Pain • An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage • Pain is subjective. There is no neurophysiological or chemical test that can measure pain. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF PAIN
Prevalence of Pain • Over 30 million Americans suffer from chronic nonmalignant pain • 20-30% of the American public suffer from acute or chronic pain • Over 70% of patients with advanced cancer report having moderate to severe pain
Barriers in the treatment of Pain • Inadequate assessment • Specific populations more likely not to be treated • Patient’s reluctance to report pain • Patient’s reluctance to take opioids • Doctor’s reluctance to prescribe opioids • Fear of regulatory scrutiny • Fear of causing addiction • Lack of knowledge regarding dosing and side effects
Important concepts to Understand • Addiction • Psychological dependence on substances for their psychic effects and is characterized by compulsive use despite harm. • Analgesic Tolerance • The need to increase the dose of opioid to achieve the same level of analgesia. • Physical Dependence • A physiologic state of neuroadaptation which is characterized by the emergence of a withdrawal syndrome if drug use is stopped or decreased abruptly, or if an antagonist is administered. • Pseudoaddiction • Pattern of drug-seeking behavior of pain patients who are receiving inadequate pain medication. Behavior is mistaken for addiction.
Guidelines for the management and treatment of Pain • WHO - global initiative on pain management (1986) • Texas State Board of Medical Examiners (1993) • Federation of State Boards (1998) • JCAHO (1999) • Governmental guidelines (AHCPR) • American Pain Society • and many more!!!!!!
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners’ Position • “Quality medical practice dictates that those citizens of TX who suffer pain and other distressing symptoms should be adequately relieved so that their quality of life is as optimum as can be.” • “The TSBME recognizes that opioids and other Scheduled Controlled substances, are indispensable for the treatment of pain…” • “It is the position of the board that these drugs be prescribed for the treatment of these symptoms in appropriate and adequate doses…”
Texas State Board of Medical Examiners’ Position • “The Board recognizes that pain, and many other symptoms are subjective complaints and appropriateness and adequacy of drug and dose will vary from individual to individual.” • “The standard will be determined largely by treatment outcome…” • Physicians should be diligent in preventing (controlled substances) from being diverted from legitimate to illegitimate use.
Standards used by Board when evaluating use of Controlled substances: • DOCUMENTATION-Medical records should include: • medical history and physical • diagnostic, therapeutic and laboratory results • evaluations and consultations • treatment objectives • discussion of risks and benefits • treatments • medication (date, type, dosage, quantity) • instructions and agreements • periodic review
Joint Commission Standards on Pain Management • Patient’s have a right to appropriate assessment and management of pain • Pain needs to be assessed, documented and followed for appropriate interventions • Policies and procedures should support the appropriate use of pain medications • Patients and their families should be educated on pain management • Discharge planning should include symptom management
Governmental Guidelineswww.guidelines.gov • 1995 - “Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome” • 1998 - “The management of persistent pain in older persons” • 1999 - “Procedure guideline for bone treatment pain” • 2000 - “Control of pain in patients with cancer. A national clinical guideline” • 2002 - “Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome”
Current Legal Climate -Undertreatment of Pain Landmark case in California with a family suing the doctor for inadequate pain control in their dying, 85 year old father during the last week of his life. Jury trial awarded family 1.5 million claiming the physicians lack of attention to pain was “reckless negligence” and constituted elder abuse.
Tips for Physicians to protect themselves from charges of Undertreatment of pain: • Review your practice against JCAHO standards • Improve knowledge in pain assessment and treatment • Utilize local consultation resources • Improve knowledge and skills in assessing substance abuse; utilize local resources for substance abuse referrals and treatment
NOCICEPTIVE SOMATIC Stimulation of the somatic nervous system skin, soft tissue, muscle, bone easily localized VISCERAL stimulation of the autonomic nervous system GI and GU tracts, cardiac, lung difficult to describe and localize NEUROPATHIC PERIPHERAL PROCESSES (neuroma) CNS PROCESSES (phantom pain) COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN TYPES OF PAINPathophysiologic categorization
Classification of PainBased on clinical course • Acute pain • Chronic pain (non-cancer) • Cancer pain • Post-surgical pain
Assessment of Pain“ABCDE” Mnemonic • Ask about pain regularly; Assess pain systematically • Believe the patient and family in their reports of pain and what relieves it • Choose pain control options appropriate for the patient, family and setting • Deliver interventions in a timely, logical and coordinated fashion • Empower patients and their families; Enable them to control their course to the greatest extent possible AHCPR 1994
Describing Pain:“PQRST” Mnemonic • Provoking or Palliative factors • Quality of pain • Radiation • Severity • Temporal
Goals in the treatment of pain • Improve quality of life • Encourage mobility • Reduce hospitalizations and ER admissions • Improve job performance • Impact function in a family unit • Prevent depression/suicide
Morphine Hydromorphone Methadone Fentanyl Oxycodone + Nonopioid analgesics + Adjuvants Step 3, Severe Pain WHO 3-STEP LADDER Step 2, Moderate Pain Combination opioids Tramadol + Adjuvants Aspirin Acetaminophen Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs + Adjuvants Step 1, Mild Pain
Utilization of Opioids:Chronic Pain • Dose around the clock - achieve blood levels in the therapeutic range and avoid blood levels falling below pain threshold • Rescue dosing - 10% of total 24 hour dose • Dose titration: • mild pain: increase dose by 10% • moderate pain: increase dose by 25-50% • severe pain: increase dose by 100%
Routes of Administration • Oral - preferred • Buccal/sublingual • Rectal • Transdermal • Subcutaneous • Intravenous • Intramuscular - CONTRAINDICATED • Intrathecal
Variables in ConsideringEquianalgesic Doses • Pain intensity • Prior opioid exposure • Incomplete cross tolerance • Age of Patient • Route of administration • Level of Consciousness • Preexisting conditions
Common Side Effects and treatments • Constipation - All patients on opioids need a regular bowel program. • Nausea - quickly develop tolerance to this • Pruritus - may need to switch opioids • Sedation - if tolerance doesn’t occur can use stimulants • Respiratory depression - most feared yet rare side effect if proper dosing followed
Fear of Respiratory Depression from Opioid Use • Patients develop tolerance to the respiratory depressant effects early in course of therapy • Patients with COPD have been shown to experience improvement in exercise tolerance and decreased SOB • Terminally ill patients required 1.5-2.5 times their regular dose of analgesia to control breathlessness; without effect on O2 saturation or respiratory rate Annals Internal Medicine 119: 906, 1993
Fentanyl Transdermal System • Medication is absorbed into the subcutaneous tissue; then absorbed into systemic circulation via capillaries • May take 18-24 hours before effect of medication therefore not idea for acute pain management • Continue previous medicine for 18-24hr after placing the patch • Use short-acting opioid for rescue dosing • Adjust dose no sooner than every 6 days • Once removing patch the effect may persist for up to 24 hours
Duragesic: Oral Morphine Equianalgesic Table GOOD RULE OF THUMB: 2 X DURAGESIC DOSE = 24 HOUR MORPHINE DOSE
Steps in Changing Opioids • Calculate 24 hour dose of current opioids • Use equianalgesic table - convert dose of current drugs to equivalent new drug • Adjust the dose of new drug to accommodate patient variability and incomplete cross tolerance • Determine dosing intervals according to duration of action of new opioid • Calculate rescue dose
Example:Mr. Kaye is receiving 8mg Dilaudid po q 3h, and his physician would like to change the patient to a sustained release morphine product for patient convenience. • Calculate the 24 hour dose of Dilaudid • 8mg x 8 = 64mg Dilaudid • Using the morphine:Dilaudid ratio figure the 24 hour equianalgesic dose morphine • Morphine: Dilaudid (4:1) • Multiply 64 by 4 = 256mg morphine equivalent • Divide the 24 hour dose by 12 for the long-acting morphine dose • 256 divided by 2 = 128 or rounded up to MS Contin 130mg q 12hour
On the same patient, figure what the rescue dose of short-acting morphine would be? • Figure the total 24 hour dose of routine medication being given • 260mg morphine per day • 10% of that can be given every 1-2 hours as needed for breakthrough pain • 10% of 260 = 26mg • can give morphine immediate release tablets (30mg) q 1-2 h or morphine liquid (20mg/ml) 1.25 ml q 1-2 hour
On the same patient, if he were to stop swallowing what could be done? • Switch to IV therapy • Figure the total dose of morphine given (260mg) • Use the equianalgesic chart to figure oral:parenteral ratio (3:1) • Divide 260mg by 3 = 87mg IV morphine/day • Decide the route (subcutaneous or IV) • Divide 87mg/24hour = 3.6mg/hour • Have boluses of 25-50% total hourly dose available q 15-30mins (1-2mg) • Use MS Contin rectally at the same dose and give the rescue dose as a sublingual medication • Use sublingual medication on a q 4 hour schedule
On the same patient, if Mr. Kaye stopped swallowing tablets but had an extended prognosis? • Consider switching to Duragesic Patch • Total Morphine dose 260mg • Duragesic patch dose (per table) is 75ug/h • Via 2x rule: 260/2=130 or 125ug/h • Same breakthrough medication is appropriate • Stop the previous routine medication 18-24 hours after the patch is placed
Bone Pain from Metastasis • NSAID • Steroids • Bisphosphonates • Radiopharmaceuticals • Radiation Therapy
Neuropathic pain • Definition: Arising directly from central and peripheral damage by injury, disease or medical treatment. A pathological pain that serves no adaptive purpose. • Frequently becomes chronic and may escalate over time • Challenging to diagnose and treat
Afferent Pain Pathways Termination in THALAMUS with afferent fibers projecting rostrally to the somatosensory CORTEX and LIMBIC SYSTEM Nociceptive signals ascend in the ANTEROLATERAL WHITE MATTER Nociceptors terminate in the DORSAL HORN and synapse in the Rexed Laminae SPINOTHALAMIC TRACTS send transmission rostrally after decussating in spinal cord NOCICEPTORS react to noxious stimuli (heat, chemical, mechanical) A-delta fibers C fibers
Mechanism and Mediators of Pain • Painful stimuli causes depolarization of A-DELTA (thinly myelinated) and C-FIBER (unmyelinated) • Inflammation from chemical messengers released from damaged tissue (AMP, Protein), mast cells (Prostaglandin), macrophages (cytokines) • This leads to lowering of activation threshold and ectopic discharges = Peripheral sensitization • Neuron itself releases substance P which turns on messengers of immune cells • Positive feedback loop • Increase input into Dorsal Horn
Peripheral Sensitization • Lowering of the nociceptor depolarization threshold and increase in ectopic discharges • Due to altered expression and distribution of sodium channels at the level of injured nociceptor and Dorsal Root Ganglion
Mechanisms of Pain in the Dorsal Horn • Depolarized Nociceptors release Glutamate at the terminal end • Glutamate normally binds to AMPA receptor causing depolarization of DH cells • With peripheral sensitization and increase input, the NMDA receptor becomes exposed and Glutamate binds NMDA and AMPA. (wind-up) • This sensitizes central nervous system such that subthreshold input depolarize neurons
Central Sensitization • Lowering of the threshold of spinal horn neurons, with an increase magnitude and duration of response to stimulation • Expansion in size of receptive field • Release of tachykinins (substance P and neurokinin A) • These bind to neurokinin receptor and increase intracellular calcium • Increases NMDA receptor up regulation • Increase in Nitrous oxide synthetase
Importance of NMDA Receptor • The NMDA Receptor is involved in the propagation of neuropathic pain • Tolerance is also related to this receptor • When the NMDA Receptor is activated, there is Central Sensitization • The opioid receptor, mu receptor, is less responsive to opioids
NEUROPATHIC PAIN Surgical Management Decompression Nerve Blocks Local Anesthetics Medical Management Membrane stabilizing Agents Drugs that enhance dorsal horn inhibition ANTIARRHYTHMICS Lidocaine Mexilitine ANTIEPILEPTICS Oxcarbazepine Clonazepam Gabapentin GABA-B agonists Baclofen STEROIDS NMDA Receptor Antagonist ANTIDEPRESSANTS Amitriptyline Desipramine Imipramine Nortriptyline ANTIEPILEPTICS Carbamazepine Oxcarbazepine Phenytoin Valproate Ketamine Dextromethoraphan Methadone Amantadine
Most commonly used adjunctive treatments • Amitryptilline • Carbamazepine • Gabapentin • Corticosteroids
Methadone • A Mu agonist and noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist • No neuroactive metabolites • Elimination is independent of renal function • Less constipating • Good oral bioavailability • Extremely low cost
Interesting Case: 65yr old Anesthesiologist with Diabetic Peripheral neuropathy • Mr. C. has stocking-glove distribution neuropathy. He had excruciating pain (10/10) while on Norco (10/325mg) 6-8 per day. • Neurontin was not well tolerated • Elavil was contraindicated due to cardiac history and conduction system disorder • Mr. C. was depressed and didn’t think life was worth living with this pain
Neuropathic pain due to Diabetes • After discussion with patient and family, we initiated a course of Methadone • His current dose of Hydrocodone was 60-80mg daily or the equivalent of 60-80mg morphine • My conversion with Methadone at low dose morphine is 5:1 • I started Mr. C on Methadone 5 mg q 8 ATC with 2.5mg q 3 hours prn
Methadone for neuropathic pain • Patient tolerated Methadone well • Within 24 hours his 10/10 pain was rated at 3/10 • Within 1 week, his pain was gone (0/10); • Precaution using Methadone: Slow accumulation, varied half-life, needs to be adjusted upward slowly (about q 7 days)