140 likes | 154 Views
Explore the attraction to quantitative analysis in library assessment, delve into the changing landscape of reference queries, and uncover the evolving nature of user communities and assessment methods.
E N D
Challenges for Library Assessment Susan Gibbons Vice Provost Andrew H. & Janet Dayton Neilly Dean River Campus Libraries University of Rochester
Attraction of the Quantitative • We love to count • Precision • Automated • Weighty • What are we counting? • What do the numbers actually tell us?
Reference Queries • 97, 850 queries in 1996 • 47,950 queries in 2006 • It’s all because of the Internet, right?
Reference Queries • 97, 850 queries in 1996 • 47,950 queries in 2006 • It’s all because of the Internet, right? • Computer queues
Show us what you carry with You all of the time.
Reference Queries • 97, 850 queries in 1996 • 47,950 queries in 2006 • It’s all because of the Internet, right? • Computer queues • 41% of ARL library homepages don’t have phone numbers
2-3 miles • Out of dorm by 8:30am • Peek study 11pm-1am • Few formal meals • Carrying everything • Very structured & busy
Reference Queries • 97, 850 queries in 1996 • 47,950 queries in 2006 • It’s all because of the Internet, right? • Computer queues • 41% of ARL library homepages don’t have phone numbers • Reference hours are off student schedules
Bibliographic Tools • Graduate students’ magic wand • Bibliographic tool • EndNote • RefWorks • Bibliographic tool • Marketing campaign • Bibliographic tool • Timing is everything
Assessment • Every campus is different; • therefore every library’s services, digital presence and facilities must be different; • therefore, every library needs local assessment methods • Remember: Accountability is local
Qualitative Assessment • Growing toolkit • Skill set is usually within reach • Subject recruitment is not hard • Opportunity for wide participation • Share experience leads to better and easier execution of change