1 / 11

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration. Aspen, Northern Great Basin. Aspen Restoration: Selective Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire. Location; Steens Mountain, Oregon Cutting Treatment – 1/3 of mature junipers cut for developing fuels base in spring 2001.

aya
Download Presentation

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

  2. Aspen, Northern Great Basin

  3. Aspen Restoration: Selective Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire Location; Steens Mountain, Oregon Cutting Treatment – 1/3 of mature junipers cut for developing fuels base in spring 2001. Fall Burns – applied October 2001 Spring Burn – applied April 2002 Cooperators; Bureau of Land Management, Burns, Oregon Otley Brothers, Inc., Diamond, Oregon

  4. Experimental Design 5 treatment replications. 3 treatments (Control (no treatment), cut & fall burn, cut & spring burn). Cut & fall burn Cut & spring burn Control

  5. Measurements: • Project has evaluated … • - Effectiveness of treatments at removing all juniper, from seedling to mature age classes. • - Aspen recruitment • - Shrub cover and density • - Understory cover, density, and diversity

  6. Selective Cut and Fall Fire Intense fire September or October burns Burned with soils dry Higher risk of fire escape

  7. Selective Cut and Spring Fire Less intense fire Late April burn Burned with soils frozen and at field capacity No risk of fire escape

  8. Results • FALL BURNS • - 99.9% juniper kill • - increased aspen suckering 6 fold (10,000 ha in 2004) • sagebrush lost, most other shrubs resprouted. • - increased bareground. • lost most of the perennial understory except for plants with growth points below ground and with fire resistant seed. • stimulated T&E species

  9. Results • SPRING BURNS • - 10% of mature juniper remain. • - 50% of juniper seedlings survived. Enough to fully restock site in 70-80 years. • - Increased aspen to 5,000 ha • - Sagebrush lost only under burned trees, other shrubs resprouted or not effected. • Understory remained largely intact. Understory cover and diversity increased 300%.

  10. Conclusions • Cut and Fall Burn • most effective method for removing juniper. • greatest aspen recruitment • greater disturbance severity • understory • hydrology

  11. Conclusions • Cut and Spring Burn • less effective method for removing subcanopy and seedling juniper. • increased aspen recruitment . . . but . . . • reduced disturbance severity • understory • hydrology • aspen

More Related