1 / 17

LLNL FY2003 Geothermal Activities

LLNL FY2003 Geothermal Activities. Paul Kasameyer Carol Bruton Geothermal Program , Lawrence Livermore National Lab Presentation to Roy Mink Berkeley, March 20, 2003. UCRL-PRES-152558.

aya
Download Presentation

LLNL FY2003 Geothermal Activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LLNL FY2003 Geothermal Activities Paul Kasameyer Carol Bruton Geothermal Program , Lawrence Livermore National Lab Presentation to Roy Mink Berkeley, March 20, 2003 UCRL-PRES-152558 This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.

  2. LLNL has projects in Geosciences and ESR&T • Paul Kasameyer will discuss geosciences • Hidden geothermal systems • Fracture characterization • Carol Bruton will discuss Energy Systems research and Technologies • Cost reduction by treatment of fluids

  3. LLNL has Geoscience Funding in two areas • Core Research: $600K • Localized Strain As a Discriminator of Hidden Geothermal Systems, Bill Foxall: $210K • Prediction and Detection of the Attributes of Induced Fractures in Enhanced Geothermal Systems, Jeff Roberts: $300K • Reinjection of Chemically Modified Geothermal Brines, Carol Bruton: $50K • Origins of Geothermal Fluids Based on Low-abundance Isotopes, Greg Nimz: $40K • Detection and Mapping: $300K • Remote Sensing for Hidden Geothermal Resources, Bill Pickles: $300K

  4. Exploration technology to expand the geothermal resource • Geosciences Goal: Develop innovative exploration techniques to expand the geothermal resource by reducing costs or enable the finding of new systems • LLNL contribution focuses on finding “hidden’ geothermal systems in the Basin and Range / eastern California • Learn why non-volcanic geothermal systems occur where they do, and how to screen large areas for targets • Evaluate imaging, strain and hydrologic methods for screening large areas for potential targets • Input into estimates of the ‘undiscovered’ resource • Expand resource so that more geothermal could be used

  5. Current LLNL projects in exploration • Attributes and screening methods for favorable sites for hidden systems • Localized Strain As a Discriminator of Hidden Geothermal Systems, Bill Foxall: $210K • Remote Sensing for Hidden Geothermal Resources, Bill Pickles: $300K • Origins of Geothermal Fluids Based on Low-abundance Isotopes, Greg Nimz: $40K

  6. InSAR shows a prominent lineament at the Dixie Valley geothermal Field

  7. Our team is examining hyper-spectral data from Dixie Meadows, a new area that will be drilled Do features in the range indicate that a geothermal system exists in the valley? • LLNL, Bill Pickles, UNR, Wendy Calvin, UU, Greg Nash and Dharminder Pal, UC Santa Cruz, Eli Silver and Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin, • HyVista Corp., Brigette Martini, • LLNL/UCSC mapping alteration at range-front boundaries and lineaments in range

  8. Technologies for enhanced geothermal system development • Geosciences Goal: Create or engineer geothermal reservoirs • LLNL contribution focuses on technical capabilities needed to predict and detect the mechanical, thermal and chemical effects of reservoir fracture manipulation • Improve modeling and measurement of fracture behavior in near-well mechanical and chemical environment • Use commercial code PulsFrac, geochemical modeling codes and laboratory measurements to design optimal frac procedures • Identify what material properties are needed for optimization • Evaluate relevance of “oilpatch” frac experience • Measure geophysical properties of fractured rocks for diagnoses • Apply in support of industry EGS projects.

  9. Current LLNL Projects in EGS Technologies • Predicting mechanical, thermal and chemical behavior of induced fractures • Prediction and Detection of the Attributes of Induced Fractures in Enhanced Geothermal Systems, Jeff Roberts: (Modeling and core properties part, ~$200K) • Reinjection of Chemically Modified Geothermal Brines, Carol Bruton: $50K • Detection of fractures • Prediction and Detection of the Attributes of Induced Fractures in Enhanced Geothermal Systems, Jeff Roberts: (Lab studies of fractured rock, ~$100K) • Test of GeoBILT, a long, multi-component EM logging tool at the Geysers. (Funded by EMI, INC., ~$40K)

  10. Detection of fractures and properties of fractured reservoir rocks is a current focus

  11. LLNL Geosciences future • Screening strategy for sites to explore for hidden geothermal or potential EGS sites • Evaluate imaging approaches at a number of developed and undeveloped site, including relationship of known B&R geothermal fields to cross-cutting trends • Determine if there are areas of large localized strain that might lead to hidden systems • Understand relationship between regional groundwater and geothermal waters • Develop and test means to predict and control mechanical, chemical and thermal frac process in geothermal wells • Experiments at DOE-sponsored EGS sites.

  12. Energy Systems Research and TestingWork at LLNL • ESR&T Goal: Maximize cost effectiveness of conversion plants to help make geothermal energy cost-competitive with fossil-fueled systems • LLNL contribution focuses on chemical issues • Understand and manipulate the chemistry and physics of geothermal fluids to • reduce maintenance and operating costs • allow more efficient utilization of geothermal heat • increase use of low temperature resources • create additional revenue streams through cascaded use

  13. Current LLNL Projects • Prevent fouling and precipitation in power plants to reduce O&M costs and allow extraction of more heat • Silica scale inhibition - L. Burton P.I., FY03 $200K • Convert dissolved minerals and metals into valuable by-products to produce additional revenue streams • Silica extraction (joint DOE/California Energy Commission funding) - B. Bourcier P.I., FY03 $100K • Metals extraction (DOE funding) - B. Bourcier P.I., FY03 $25K

  14. Low salinity brine Medium salinity brine Inhibitortestingin lab Isolating variables Scale inhibition: Develop a predictive model of silica polymerization and deposition using lab and field data Increasingsupersatn. • Controlling variables: • SiO2 concentration • temperature • pH • salinity • inhibitor dosage Silica deposition rate, log Decreasingsalinity pH

  15. Future plans in scaling • Validate the model at field sites • Improve model by iterating between the field and lab • Extend to other types of scale (e.g carbonates, sulfates) and mixed scales

  16. Silica and metals extractionat Mammoth Lakes, California Silica extraction Goal: Develop processes to produce high value mineral by-products with properties matching those of commercial materials 600-900 ppm SiO2 Metals extraction ~1 ppm Cs, Rb, W ~6 ppm Li Geothermal fluid 100-200 ppm TDS To evaporative cooler 1200 ppm TDS 250 ppm SiO2 Reverse osmosis separation Potential Value (gross, annual, in millions) Silica $8.6 Lithium $1.5 Rubidium $90 Cesium $100 Tungsten $2.6

  17. Current CEC funding ends Silica Mammoth Process development Pilot plant Commercial process • Science basis • Lab and field tests • Market testing • CEC funding? New site Process development Pilot plant Commercial process Future plans for silica and metals extraction Metals Mammoth Process development Pilot plant Commercial process • Use existing • technologies • Apply new • separation/extraction • technologies

More Related