1 / 39

Measurements of a and future projections

Measurements of a and future projections. Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines. Outline. Introduction to the measurement of a Results from the B-factories:

aya
Download Presentation

Measurements of a and future projections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measurements of aand future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines

  2. Outline • Introduction to the measurement of a • Results from the B-factories: • B p+ p-, p± p0, p0 p0 • B r+ r-, r± r0, r0 r0 • B0 (r p)0 • Summary and outlook • Will not cover expectations at LHC and Super B-Factories • See talks of P. Robbe and A. Bevan

  3. Measuring a Access to a from the interference of a b→u decay (g) with B0B0 mixing (b) Inc. penguin contribution

  4. From aeff to a: Isospin Analysis Gronau and London, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3381 (1990) Assume SU(2) symmetry among amplitudes Neglecting EW Penguins: is a pure tree mode. The triangles share a common side.

  5. Time Dependent Analysis Outline • Fully reconstruct the B decaying to a CP eigenstate. • Tag the flavor of the other B. • Mis-tag probability measured in Bflav sample. • Measure Dt. • Extract S and C with a ML fit on a signal enriched sample. • Signal PDF from MC. • Background PDF from MC or sidebands

  6. Variables used in the ML fit Event Topology Combine variables in For N signal signal • PID info: • DIRC + dE/dX (BaBar) • Aerogel + dE/dX (Belle) • Dt background background

  7. 347 million BB hep-ex/0607106 :results (preliminary) Background Signal B0tag mES B0tag mES DE DE Npp = 675±42 sPlot

  8. 535 million BB hep-ex/0608035 :results (preliminary) Npp = 1464±65

  9. C =−A :results (preliminary) 347 million BB Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Spp = - 0.53 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 BaBar (Spp, Cpp) = (0.0, 0.0) excluded at 3.6 s Average 535 million BB Belle Cpp = - 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05 Spp= - 0.61 ± 0.10 ± 0.04 2.3 s discrepancy Observation of Direct CPV at 5.5 s Observation of mixing-induced CPV at 5.6 s

  10. (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0607106 Np±p0 = 572 ± 53 Np0p0 = 140 ± 25

  11. Da = a - aeff a constraint from Da 1- C.L. |Da| < 41o at 90% C.L. a a Frequentist interpretation: use only the B→pp branching fractions and isospin-triangle relations. 1- C.L. No stringent constraint from ppsystem alone  needrrandrp

  12. Theanalysis • Worse than pp at first sight: • V V final state. Mixture of CP = +1 and -1: need to know each fraction • However: • ~100% longitudinally polarized (~pure CP-even state) • no need for elaborate angular analysis • Branching fraction for B0gr+r- is larger than p+p- • Branching fraction for B0gr0r0 is small (~1.1x10-6) • small penguin pollution

  13. results (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0607098

  14. results 275 million BB PRL 96, 171801 (2006) Nrr = 194±32

  15. results (preliminary)

  16. results (preliminary) 232 million BB hep-ex/0607092 Nr+r0 =390 ± 49

  17. results (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0607097 Nr0r0 = 98 ± 32± 22 3.0 s evidence

  18. a constraint from hep-ex/0607098 PRL 96, 171801 (2006) [71, 105]o at 68.3% C.L. Use BR(B->r0r0)<1.1 X 10-6 a Frequentist interpretation: use only the B→ρρ branching fractions, polarization fractions and isospin-triangle relations. First evidence of B→r0r0 Constraint on a is less stringent

  19. TheDalitzanalysis A. Snyder and H. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 2139 (1993) r+p- r-p+ r0p0 B0 p+p-p0 B0 Monte Carlo • Time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis assuming isospin simmetry. • 26 coefficients of the bilinear form factor terms occurring in the decay rate are measured with a UML fit. • Physically relevant quantities are derived from subsequent fits to these coefficients. Interference provides information on strong phase difference r(1450) and r(1700) are included

  20. analysis (preliminary) 347 million BB hep-ex/0608002 m’ and q’ are the transformed Dalitz variables

  21. analysis (preliminary) 449 million BB hep-ex/0609003 • Dalitz + Isospin (pentagon) analysis • 26(Dalitz) + 5(Br(rp), Br(r+p0), Br(r0p+), A(r+p0), and A(r0p+)) r+p- r-p+ r0p0 Signal SCF BB bkg continuum mass helicity

  22. a constraint from (preliminary) [0,8]o U [60,95]o U[129,180]o at 68.3% C.L. 1- C.L. 1- C.L. a (deg) a (deg)

  23. Belle rp result is not included. It will weakens the suppression of solutions around 0o and 180o. +11 -9 aB-Factories = [ 93 ] º +5 -19 aGlobal Fit = [ 98 ] º CKMfitter http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/ UTfit http://utfit.dreamhosters.com/ aconstraints Global Fit B-Factories aB-Factories = [92 ± 7]o (SM Solution) aGlobal Fit = [93 ± 6]o Nice agreement

  24. Pending Issues • Discrepancy on Cpp • Solutions at 0o and 180o should be (more) suppressed. • Using rp: nice suppression from BaBar, not from Belle. • Background modeling. • Interference with other resonances or non-resonant component in rp, rr modes. • Subtleties on statistical analysis with small statistics. Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Cpp = - 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05

  25. Uncertainties on a extraction • Possible contribution of EW penguin and isospin breaking effect. • EW penguin effect seems to be small (~2°). • Other isospin breaking effect ~ O(1°). [M.Gronau and J.Zupan PRD 71, 074017(2005)] • I=1 contribution due to finite width of r mass (rr mode). [A.Falk et al. PRD 69, 011502(R)] Too small to be an issue at B-factories

  26. Summary and Outlook • The three modes are complementary. • Need to study them all. • Good agreement between the CKM fit (a determined by others) and direct measurements. • Still a lot to do. • Refine previous analysis and exploit new ideas: • a from B->a1p ? • Constraint on a from B0->r+r- and B+->K*0r+ [M. Beneke et al., Phys. Lett. B638, 68(2006)] • Doubling of statistics at the B-factories is much needed. • Looking forward to LHC and to a Super B-Factory.

  27. Backup Slides

  28. CP Time Dependent CP Asymmetry mixing decay Amplitude ratio CP eigenvalue

  29. BABARDetector

  30. DIRC: Control samples for p and K p K Projection for 2.5 < p < 3 GeV/c

  31. :results (preliminary) Cpp = - 0.16 ± 0.11 ± 0.03 Spp = - 0.53 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 (Spp, Cpp) = (0.0, 0.0) excluded at 3.6 s

  32. :results (preliminary) App = + 0.55 ± 0.08 ± 0.05 Spp= - 0.61 ± 0.10 ± 0.04 Observation of Direct CPV at 5.5 s Observation of mixing-induced CPV at 5.6 s

  33. a constraint from

  34. a constraint from

  35. formalism Direct CP Violation CP violation in the interference with and without B mixing.

  36. parameters (prelim)

  37. Direct CP violation in Significance for non-zero DCPV: BaBar:3.0 s Belle:2.4 s

  38. Courtesy of Marcella Bona Differences in peak height

More Related