270 likes | 472 Views
The Community College Research Center (CCRC). We focus on:Access to and success in postsecondary educationHigh school to college transitionMissions, governance and accountabilityPrograms and practiceWorkforce education. CCRC conducts quantitative and qualitative studies on community colleges
E N D
1. Developmental Placement Policies and Student Success in the Connecticut Community Colleges Davis Jenkins and Matthew Zeidenberg
Connecticut Community Colleges
Pathways to Student Success: Basic Skills Education
Middlesex Community College
November 16, 2007
2. The Community College Research Center (CCRC) We focus on:
Access to and success in postsecondary education
High school to college transition
Missions, governance and accountability
Programs and practice
Workforce education
3. Research Questions Can we identify a common set of ACCUPLACER cut scores for all 12 colleges to maximize student success?
Are there ACCUPLACER scores below which students are unlikely to succeed?
4. Data and Methods Tracked 8,874 fall 2001 first-time CT CC students for 19 terms (about five years)
Analyzed relationship between students ACCUPLACER scores and various measures of student success
Ran separate analyses for 2 English (Reading and Sentence Skills) and 3 math (Arithmetic, Elementary Algebra and College Math) ACCUPLACER tests
6. Placement Test Taking Math or English ACCUPLACER scores not reported for approximately 1/3 of cohort
Students initial intent not strong indicator of behavior
No scores for 1/4 of degree-seeking students
37% of non-credential-seeking students took test
22% of graduates were non-credential seekers to start
7. Percentage of Students with Reported ACCUPLACER Scores by Test
8. Test Scores and Student Success ACCUPLACER scores and most success measures are correlated, but not strongly; generally no clear cut scores or ranges
Dev. ed. and gatekeeper course grades
Dev. ed. and gatekeeper course success
Course completion, credit accumulation, credential completion, and persistence
Gatekeeper course success by students who took no developmental
9. Correlation between Developmental Grades and ACCUPLACER Scores
10. Probability of Developmental English Success vs. ACCUPLACER Reading Score
11. Probability of Developmental Math Success vs. ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score
12. Probability of College English Success vs. ACCUPLACER Reading Score
13. Probability of College Math Success vs. ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score
14. Probability of Credential Completion vs. ACCUPLACER Reading Score
15. Probability of Credential Completion vs. ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score
16. Probability of College English Success vs. ACCUPLACER Reading Score:Students with No Developmental English
17. Probability of College Math Success vs. ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score:Students with No Developmental Math
18. Developmental Education Enrollment Higher scoring students were less likely to enroll in developmental; however, many low-scoring students also did not enroll
63% enrolled in developmental: 77% of credential-seeking, 38% of non-credential-seeking
20% of lowest scorers in Reading and 25% of lowest scorers in Math took no developmental
19. Probability of Developmental English Enrollment vs. ACCUPLACER Reading Score
20. Probability of Developmental Math Enrollment vs. ACCUPLACER Arithmetic Score
21. Probability of Developmental Math Enrollment vs. ACCUPLACER Elementary Algebra Score
22. Probability of Developmental Math Enrollment vs. ACCUPLACER Arithmetic Score
23. Developmental Education Outcomes Many developmental students did not attempt college-level English or math
Students who took dev. English passed college-level English at rates comparable to non-developmental students; developmental math students passed college math at lower rates
Very few students who started in developmental three levels below college completed a credential in five years
24. College-level English Outcomes by First Dev. Ed. Course Level (Degree Seekers Only)
25. College-level Math Outcomes by First Dev. Ed. Course Level (Degree Seekers Only)
26. Recommendations Consider system-wide policy on which students must take placement tests
Agree on common set of placement rules across the 12 colleges
Consider requiring students receiving low scores to take developmental education
27. Recommendations (cont.) Consider alternate strategies for students with very low Reading scores or who place in dev. ed. 3 levels below college
Encourage more dev. ed. students to enroll in college-level English and math and align curricula to ensure readiness
Continue to track student progression and outcomes; convene faculty and staff to identify opportunities for improvement; evaluate solutions and make further improvements
28. For more information: Please visit us on the web at http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu,
where you can download presentations, reports,
CCRC Briefs, and sign up for news announcements.