Reaching a Verdict

1. Reaching a Verdict

2. THE SUMMATION • Each side summarizes its key arguments and evidence • No new evidence can be introduced • If the defence presented evidence, it goes first Law & Order Closing Arguments George Zimmerman closing arguments

3. THE CHARGE TO THE JURY • The judge reviews the facts and defines the legal issues in the case for the jury • She can indicate which evidence is more important than others • The charge to the jury is often the basis for appeals if one side sees legal errors which may prejudice the jury George Zimmerman Case

4. JURY DELIBERATION • Verdicts must be unanimous • Note-taking is not always allowed so jurors must often rely on their memories • The jurors determine the facts in the case; the judge at this stage only rules on law • Facts are considered in two steps: • Is the evidence believable? • How important is the believable evidence? • What the jury believes determines which law applies. Ex. A hunting incident • Reasonable doubt means that the jury gives the accused the benefit of the doubt • It also means if they believe the defence’s evidence or can’t decide whom to believe, they must acquit • If the judge accepts their inability to reach a decision, they are dismissed ( a hung jury) • A jury may never disclose what went on in the jury room Doctor MacNeill Murders wife

5. OUTCOME • A defendant acquitted is free to go • The jury usually has no say in the penalty • Sentencing may occur then or at a later date Sentencing Hearing – Trevor Zinck Doctor MacNeillCase Reaches a verdict