260 likes | 364 Views
WP3 The LiCAS Laser Straightness Monitor (LSM). Greg Moss. Contents. Introduction The LSM ray tracer Reconstruction Calibration Constants Determining Calibration Constants Planned work (Marker Reconstruction simulation). -y. z. Straightness Monitor Basics.
E N D
Contents • Introduction • The LSM ray tracer • Reconstruction • Calibration Constants • Determining Calibration Constants • Planned work • (Marker Reconstruction simulation)
-y z Straightness Monitor Basics The train needs to know how it is aligned internally. Achieved by internal FSI and the Laser Straightness Monitor. • LSM is used to measure: - Transverse translations - Rotations • Require 1µm precision over length of train Incoming beam Retro reflector Outgoing beam Rotation: Spots move opposite directions Translation: Spots move same direction CCD Camera
Ray Tracer • Ray tracer written in C++ • Open GL interface • Highly flexible • Agrees with Fortran version • Can use many setups: • Lab • Car • ‘Virtual’ setups • Any general setup A ‘virtual’ setup has a mirror/camera combination replaced by the image of the camera in the mirror. It is mathematically equivalent (if the CCD X axes are inverted).
Reconstruction Ray tracer is used as a part of a fit function for the Minuit fitting package • Position & orientation of the LSM block used as the fit parameters • CCD spots fitted by Chi-squared Minimisation • 100% effective to within nm with good convention choice and no noise
Reconstruction • If perfectly set up reconstruction is limited by beam spot fit precision (limited by camera noise) • 0.7 microns currently used (Lab in air) • Gives reconstruction precision of 0.24 microns & 1.67 micro-radians
Calibration • Still need to know the exact position of the components • These are the calibration constants • The errors on the constants give the systematic error • There are different possible sets of constants
Effect of Errors in Constants • A large set of ray traces with many different calibration constants was taken. • Error on the reconstructed parameters then plotted against each calibration constant. • The gradient gives the dependence on the constant.
Calibration Constant Determination • Constants are being measured using a CMM • To determine the calibration constants more accurately a brute force method is in development. • The LSM block produces data in many different orientations • Using externally measured orientation data (from a laser tracker) the calibration constants can be determined • See next slide for details
Calibration Constant Determination • This method compares spot positions generated with a set of calibration constants with the measured values (knowing the correct orientation). • Many orientations are used • It changes the calibration constants until the difference between the measured spots are the same as the calculated spots
Calibration Constant Determination • Problems with Standard model – constants are heavily dependent on each other: correct minimum not found easily • Virtual model gives correct answers to O(10-14)m if given perfect data • If given realistic data some constants are found to O(10-7)m, some fail to be found within 10-5m. • However, the constants that are found well are the ones the reconstruction is sensitive to! • Reconstructing using these constants as the only source of error gives precision of 0.037 microns & 0.25 micro-radians. (Currently only done twice – complete test planned) • Adding 0.7 micron error to spot positions gives errors of 0.23 microns & 1.6 micro-radians - remaining miscalibration has no effect
Planned Work • Some CMM measurements not made yet • Errors on laser tracker data not accounted for • Optimal number of measurements to take yet to be found • Advanced error propagation not completed • Detailed investigation into covariance not completed • Real Data to be taken in May • Combine with calibration of other RTRS elements
Conclusions • The LSM is a critical part of the LiCAS RTRS • Highly precise & accurate reconstruction needed • Needs to be well calibrated • Some Calibration constants critical • They can be found to the accuracy required
Marker Reconstruction Simulation • The following are slides from Grzegorz Grzelak • They show how a complete simulation of a tunnel survey is performed • After the process the (mis)alignment can be put into PLACET and a beam simulation effected. https://savannah.cern.ch/projects/placet/