1 / 11

Information for Candidates for Tenure and Promotion

Information for Candidates for Tenure and Promotion. Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee 27 October 2011. Documents. G. O. 4 Departmental standards documents Modifications “Interim modification” of 2009 Interviews Written questions, if needed. Timeline.

aysel
Download Presentation

Information for Candidates for Tenure and Promotion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information for Candidates for Tenure and Promotion Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee 27 October 2011

  2. Documents • G. O. 4 • Departmental standards documents • Modifications • “Interim modification” of 2009 • Interviews • Written questions, if needed

  3. Timeline • Oct - Nov: department T&P committees • Dec: portfolios forwarded to Dean • Materials added • Department ballots • Department head’s recommendation • Jan: Deans make recommendations • All parties concerned receive copy, including FTPC

  4. Timeline • Jan: Candidates email materials to FTPC • Deans verify and place candidates’ portfolios in FTPC evidence room • Jan-Feb: FTPC review • Questions, if necessary, presented in writing • March: FTPC voting

  5. The Review Process + comm. recomm. dossier Candidate School/Department T&P Committee Academic Dean January October - December + dean’s recomm. January 5 + FTPC recomm. February January 12 Provost FTPC FTPC deliberations March 18

  6. Voting • Written ballots • Departmental representative abstains • Positive recommendation requires two-thirds majority

  7. Second Reviews • If needed can be requested • Positive result: only second review goes forward to the Provost • Negative result: both first and second reviews go forward

  8. Recommendations • FTPC makes recommendations to Provost • Candidate notified of recommendation • Provost discusses recommendations with deans • Tenure decisions: President • Promotion decisions: Provost • Appeals

  9. Appeals • FTPC not involved • Standing Appeals Committee • G. O. 4 describes grounds for appeals

  10. Portfolios • Period of review • Electronic or hardcopy • Teaching, scholarship, service • Scholarship • Types of publications clearly indicated • Supporting documents

  11. Questions

More Related