260 likes | 451 Views
Aims. Consider Scottish ASL ActConsider Scottish GIRFEC Guidance Understand the difference between medical and social model of disability and the shift from needs based/deficit to strengths based approachesProfessional Constructs That Will Influence ThisConclude: Dialogue and Multi-professional
E N D
1. University of Central Lancashire School of Social WorkThe Centre Seminar Series 2009-10 Children and Young People in Society Disabled Children and Inclusion: Policy, Practice, Professionals and Theory
Dr John Davis
Senior Lecturer in Childhood Studies
University of Edinburgh
3rd March 2010
2. Aims Consider Scottish ASL Act
Consider Scottish GIRFEC Guidance
Understand the difference between medical and social model of disability and the shift from needs based/deficit to strengths based approaches
Professional Constructs That Will Influence This
Conclude: Dialogue and Multi-professional practice
3. Modern Social Model of Disability :
...the disadvantage or restriction of activity caused by a contemporary social organisation which takes little or no account of people who have...impairments and thus excludes them from participation in the mainstream of social activities. (UPIAS/Disability Alliance, 1976)
UPAIS/Disability Alliance (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability. Methuen: London. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/UPIAS.pdf
4. Education (Additional Support For Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 Replacement of current assessment and recording system
Widening of concept
More rights for Parents
Mediation and Tribunal
Code of Practice
Co-ordinated Support Plan
5. Education (Additional Support For Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 A child or young person has additional support needs for the purposes of this Act where, for whatever reason, the child or young person is, or is likely to be, unable without the provision of additional support to benefit from school education provided or to be provided for the child or young person
6. Education (Additional Support For Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 Children and young people may require additional support for a variety of reasons and may include those who:
have motor or sensory impairments
are being bullied
are particularly able or talented
have experienced a bereavement
are looked after
have a learning difficulty
7. Education (Additional Support For Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 are living with parents who are abusing substances
are living with parents who have mental health problems
have English as an additional language
are not attending school regularly
have emotional or social difficulties
are on the child protection register
are young carers
8. New Act New ‘flexible Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) for children who face long-term complex or multiple barriers to learning and who require frequent access to a diversity of services from outwith education authority
Within 16 weeks of notifying parent
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/education/shasla-00.asp
9. Duties On Education Authorities Provide for Additional Support Needs
Prepare and Review CSPs Every 12 Months
Interagency Advice, Assessment and Info
Take Into Account the Views of the Child and Parents
Provide Independent Mediation
Address Transition
Publish, review and update their policies
Health boards and social work have a duty to help educational authorities
10. Co-ordinated Support Plan The CSP Must Contain
The Name of the School, Name of a Contact Person, to Provide Info and Co-ordinate the Plan.
Target Learning Outcomes and Objectives
Additional Support Required to Meet the Outcomes and Objectives
Who Will Provide the Support
Review Every 12 Months or Earlier
All Involved in Learning Contribute to Plan
11. Parents Request:
Mediation,
Review,
Appeal,
And Placing to Independent Special School
Have a supporter with them at any meeting
12. New approach Tries to balance individual needs for support with awareness of wider social issues
Recognises range of support for diverse range of kids already supported
Still recognises need for special provision
13. Not Intrusive ensuring that parents, and young people, understand, and are asked to agree to, the aims of any assessment
adopting the least intrusive and most effective course of action affecting the lives of children, young people and families
14. GIRFEC Policy Background 1998 New Community Schools Funding
2001 For Scotland’s Children Report
2002 Children’s Change Fund
2003 Integrated Children’s Services within The Local Authority
2005 Getting it Right for Every Child in Scotland
2005 A Curriculum for Excellence
15. Policy Change Into PracticeMidlothian Setting up of Integration Teams
Setting up of Locality Forums
Different ‘Professions’ within Children’s Services working more closely together
Development of Role of Family Support Work
16. New Family Support Service? Degree Professional
Developing Universal & Targeted Services
Leading Multi-Professional Working
‘Change Agents’ and ‘Boundroids’
Non Statutory Holistic Support
Workforce Reform
17. Ways Forward:Building A Theory Dolan (2006) Types, Qualities and Principles
Gilligan (2000) Forms of Support
Gilligan (2000) Parents Complex Identities
Hill (2005) & Gilligan (1999) Child Agents
Davis (2006, 2007) Complex/Fluid
Smith (2009) Small Change v Radical Leap
18. Dolan (2006) Social Support 4 Types: concrete, emotional, advice and esteem
3 Qualities of social support: Closeness, reciprocity and durability (e.g. a reliable person you have know for a long time).
Range of ‘principles’ concerning: partnership; minimum intervention; clarity of focus; strength-based perspectives; informal networks; accessible/flexible services; self referral; inclusion; diversity; and best practice
19. Gilligan (2000) More Than A Child Protection Service Mobilising support for where children live their lives -Family, peer, school, sport team, church etc
Child-focused supporting - social, psychological & educational development
Prevent child leaving family by: reducing stress, promoting competence, connecting child & family to support and resources
20. Gilligan (2000) Parents Have Complex Identities Multiplicity of roles and identities
Isolated young mother , can also become some one with good child care who is integrated into community as a student worker, team mate, football supporter
Key principle of family support is to enhance the number of identities available
This may take time and require sensitivity
The role of schools and education is very important
21. Hill (2005) & Gilligan (1999) Children Are Complex Children can gain support from wide range of adults and children
Relates to mobility and autonomy
Notions of boundary of family not fixed - e.g. reconstituted families
Children create their own identities
Childhood is more regulated
22. Different Theories
23. Conclusion - Davis (2006 & 2007) Professional roles to be examined as much as parent’s/child’s
Labelling/deficit models - give professionals/parents an excuse
No Single Theory Works in Its Totality - individual, developmental, structural, ecological, post-structural etc
MUD, SID, RED, SSD, SDD - challenges victims discourse and realises that professionals can be as much a part of the problem as the solution
Practitioners need to be reflexive and discuss the pros and cons of different personal and professional positions
This needs to include an understanding of power, politics and vested interests
24. References Davis JM (2007) ‘Analysing Participation and Social Exclusion With Children and Young People. Lessons From Practice’ International Journal of Children’s Rights 15(1):121-146.
Davis, JM (2006) ‘Childhood Studies and The Construction of Medical Discourses: Questioning Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; A Theoretical Perspective ’ in Critical New Perspectives on ADHD, Ed. Lloyd, G., Stead, J. & Cohen, D., London: Taylor and Francis.
25. References Hill, M (2005) Children’s Boundaries in McKie L & Cunningham-Burley S. (eds) (2005) Families in Society: Boundaries and Relationships. Bristol: The Policy Press*
Gilligan R.(2000). Family support: issues and prospects. In Canavan J , Dolan P , Pinkerton J (eds) Family Support: Directions from Diversity. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
26. References Gilligan, R. (1999) ‘Working with Social Networks Key Resources in Helping Children at Risk’ In Hill, M. (ed) Effective Ways of Working with Children and their Families. London: Jessica Kingsley
Smith, M (2009) What is Family Support Work? A Case Study Within the context of One Local Authority in Scotland. Doctoral Thesis (Education). University of Edinburgh.