1 / 15

Maxey Flats Disposal Site

Maxey Flats Disposal Site. Presented by: Joseph Barker Rick Wagoner Alisa Applegate Jacqueline Miley Sheri White. History of Maxey Flats. 279 acre waste burial facility for radioactive material located in Fleming County, KY Waste was put in trenches from 1963 to 1976 Closed in 1977.

azia
Download Presentation

Maxey Flats Disposal Site

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Maxey Flats Disposal Site Presented by: Joseph Barker Rick Wagoner Alisa Applegate Jacqueline Miley Sheri White

  2. History of Maxey Flats • 279 acre waste burial facility for radioactive material • located in Fleming County, KY • Waste was put in trenches from 1963 to 1976 • Closed in 1977

  3. Surface water and decomposition of the wastes have produced radioactive leachate that is migrating outside the restricted area Reasons For Shutting Down

  4. There are 3 primary reasons for the shutdown Poor planning and design Poor site management and operations Poor governmental regulation Reasons for Shutting Down (2)

  5. Poor Planning and Design • A limited site survey was conducted at Maxey Flats • There was movement of waste material leading to contamination of soil • In hindsight, it was determined that the soil was of poor composition for a disposal site • Soil composition wasn’t appropriate for building a soil cap used for closing the trenches and was incapable of limiting the water flow into the trenches • The “bathtub effect” was create, trenches could fill up faster than it could leach out to surrounding soil

  6. Poor Site Management and Operations • Liquid should be limited in the trenches, but poor operational practice of disposing of contaminated liquids on the slopes of the trenches increased the “bathtub effect” • Some containers were not filled all the way when stacking. So after time they settled in created shifts and cracks. • When cleaning up spills with earth moving equipment, they would track through the contaminated soil and spread it to the surrounding soils.

  7. Poor Governmental Regulation • Government classification of low-level and high-level radioactive waste was flawed because it was based on method of production not radioactivity • Maxey Flat was a low-level disposal facility many of the waste had a higher radioactivity than spent fuel rods that were labeled as high-level radioactive waste

  8. Hazards • There are 3 levels of radioactive waste • High level • Intermediate level • Low level • 3 Classes of low level waste • A, B, and C – Least hazardous to most hazardous • Health effects are long term risk with low level exposure

  9. Dangers of Low-level Radiation • Tritium cannot be absorbed into the skin and is only dangerous if consumed • Strontium-90 has been linked to tissue near the bone and bone cancer, as well as leukemia • Plutonium 238 and 239 can be inhaled or ingested causing skeleton diseases as well as liver problems • Cobalt 60 and Cesium-137 can cause malignant tumors and cancer

  10. Impacts • Maxey Flats is located 300 feet above surrounding streams • Rainwater runoff goes into the Rock Lick Creek that leads to the Licking River • The Licking River Leads to the Ohio River that supplies water for a half a million people • 300 people live within a five-mile radius of the ‘Restricted Area’ • The closest residence is within ¼ mile • There are 120 wells and 25 springs within this 5 mile radius

  11. Impacts (2) • Maxey Flats in 1 of 6 low-level radioactive waste sites that were licensed in the 60’s and early 70’s • 3 of these sites including Maxey Flats have been shutdown • There is a multi-million dollar project to re-engineer the topography to guard against any farther release of radioactive leachates

  12. Design and operating procedures are important to site performance Perform a complete geologic, soil, and water analysis to determine the site characteristics before establishing the waste site Characteristics must be rigorously studies and evaluated to determine if the natural barriers will work in concern with the manmade structures of the disposal facility to safely contain the waste Keeping water out of trenches reduces radionuclide, migration Lessons Learned From Maxey Flat

  13. Lessons Learned From Maxey Flat • A strong quality assurance program, employee training, and regulatory oversight are essential • Audits and regular inspections help to ensure that the waste reaching the disposal site has acceptable content and form • Monitoring the air, water, and living organisms on the near the disposal site to detect any migration of radioactive materials can be effectively accomplished and that problems can be remediated long before they threaten human health and the environment

  14. References • What Have We Learned About Disposing of Low-Level Radioactive Waste? (1998), Retrieved Oct. 22, 2004, from http://www.state.nj.us/llrwsb/learned.htm • Saleska, Scott, (1990). Low-level radioactive waste: Gamma rays in the garbage. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 46, No. 3. Retrieved Oct. 22, 2004, from http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/1990/a90/a90saleska.html • KY Division of Waste Management, Maxey Flats, (2004), Retrieved Oct. 22, 2004, from http://www.waste.ky.gov/programs/sf/Maxey+Flats.htm • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kentucky NPL/NPL Caliber Cleanup Site Summaries, Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal, (2004), Retrieved Oct. 22, 2004, from http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplky/maxfltky.htm • Appleby, Alan, Ph.D., Costello, Martin, M.S., & Rose, Steven, M.S. (1996) What Lessons Have Been Learned From Early Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities. Rutgers University, Department of Environmental Sciences. Retrieved on October, 20, 2004 from http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/llrw/download/fact17.pdf. • Makhijani, Arjun and Saleska, Scott (1996) High-Level Dollars, Low-Level Sense: Chapter 5: Summary and Recommendations. Retrieved on October 20, 2004 from http://www.ieer.org/pubs/highlvl4.html.

  15. References •  CRCPD. (1996). Environmental monitoring report for commercial low-level radioactive waste disposal sites (1960s through early 1990s). The Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) Committee on RadioactiveWaste Management. Published by the National Low-Level Waste Management Program, November 1996.  • EPA Facts About Cesium-137. (2002) http://www.epa.gov/superfund/resources/radiation/pdf/cesium.pdf. Retrieved October 22,2004. • EPA-Strontium. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/strontium.htm. Retrieved October 22,2004. • Hjorth, Linda S., Eichler, Barbara A., Khan, Ahmed S., & Morello, John A. (2003). Technology and Society A Bridge to the 21st Century. Columbus, OH: PrenticeHall. • Envirocare. (August 2001). http://www.xmission.com/~lwvut/envirocare.html. Retrieved October 22, 2004. Characterization of Fractures at a Nuclear Waste Site Using Resistivity Imaging. (n.d). Retrieved October 23, 2004, from http://www.technos-inc.com/maxeyflats.html • Wikipedia. Cobalt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt. Retrieved October 22. 2004. • Wikipedia. Plutonium.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium. Retrieved October 21, 2004.

More Related