1 / 15

Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team

Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team. Plan, Schedule Costs Team. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) WBS Structure. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Schedule Unconstrained by Subsystem Deliveries.

azuka
Download Presentation

Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adv. LIGO Installation (INS)Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team • Plan, Schedule • Costs • Team LIGO Laboratory

  2. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI)WBS Structure LIGO Laboratory

  3. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI)Schedule Unconstrained by Subsystem Deliveries LIGO Laboratory

  4. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI)Schedule Unconstrained by Subsystem Deliveries LIGO Laboratory

  5. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI)Schedule Unconstrained by Subsystem Deliveries LIGO Laboratory

  6. Detailed Primavera Schedule Installation delayed by SUS deliveries; fixed in M020121-E2 revisions Commissioning duration Compressed too much; Fixed in M020121-E2 revisions LIGO Laboratory

  7. Schedule/Planning Methodology • Two closely related schedules which iterate towards convergence as we continue to refine our planning for advanced LIGO • A top level systems engineering schedule (MS Project) • Guides the bottoms-up planning • Reflects/summarizes the results of detailed planning • Basis for executive decisions about the needed sequence (logic in the system level planning) and duration of major schedule activities • A bottoms-up, or detailed, schedule (Primavera) • “Informs" the top-level schedule on needed durations and what is possible • Spreads estimated costs over time in order to provide a project funding timeline • Advanced LIGO is not yet a “Baselined” and controlled project • When funding is received, the project ‘machinery’ is in place to put the schedule under strict management control LIGO Laboratory

  8. Proposed Schedule Revisions • Current departure between the top-level schedule (M020121-E2) and the detailed schedule with regard to the Suspensions development plan results in: • Later installation start due to an overly lengthy design phase (3 years from starting a SUS controls prototype test at LASTI, 11/2004, to the start of SUS production, 11/2007 • Inadequate commissioning duration • Proposed remedy: • Use the Photon drive prototype in SUS noise prototype testing at LASTI rather than a 1st article (Saves 5 months) • The SUS Prelim Design phase should not extend 6 months past the LASTI controls test. Reduce to 2 months. (Saves 4 months) • Start the long lead procurement for SUS prior to the completion of noise testing at LASTI, but after noise prototype assembly LIGO Laboratory

  9. N.B: Primavera detailed schedule is summarized in top, gray bars Systems group proposed revision (M020121-E2) is lower, blue bars Summary Level INS ScheduleDetailed Primavera Schedule Compared to Proposed Changes (M020121-E2) Commissioning Period lengthened to match detailed schedule (Primavera) Operational dates; Might be shorter when revisions are integrated into Primavera LIGO Laboratory

  10. INS Costs • All costs are in base year dollars (un-escalated) • Total cost = $24,829K including 22% contingency • Proposed construction cost = $24,829K – ~1.33 x $10,855K direct labor incl. Indirect (mostly observatory, low overhead staff) = ~$10.4M • Direct labor costs are borne by LIGO operations funds LIGO Laboratory

  11. INS Costs • Equipment costs = $2,351K • Approximately $7,270K per IFO total cost, of which $2,630K is proposed project costs($7.27M – 1.33 x $3.49M = $2.6M) LIGO Laboratory

  12. INS Equipment Cost Estimate LIGO Laboratory

  13. INS Costs • Interferometer-1 cost breakdown • 46% for Commissioning • 37% for de-integration and Installation • Costs based on initial LIGO experience and detailed bottoms-up estimation LIGO Laboratory

  14. INS Commissioning Costs • Labor mix and hours based on team composition per task times expected task duration and times needed duty cycle for labor skills LIGO Laboratory

  15. Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI)Team • LIGO Lab manages the installation and commissioning effort • Leader: Dennis Coyne (LIGO Lab, acting) • Key Participants: • All hardware development teams within the LSC, both from within and outside of the LIGO Lab (e.g. UG, UB, LZH, UFL, LSU, Stanford, etc.) support the installation and commissioning with visiting technical staff/experts in their subsystems • All technical staff at the observatories, including operators • Skilled trade/contract labor is used for labor intensive efforts for which LSC expertise is not essential (pulling cables, rigging, etc.) LIGO Laboratory

More Related