1 / 10

Do governance indicators matter?

Do governance indicators matter?. Empirics of Governance Seminar Washington 1-2 May 2008 Nils Boesen. The point of departure. Governance reforms are painstakingly difficult Donor support to governance reform has been ineffective Donor driven reforms Politically uninformed

azuka
Download Presentation

Do governance indicators matter?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do governance indicators matter? Empirics of Governance Seminar Washington 1-2 May 2008 Nils Boesen

  2. The point of departure • Governance reforms are painstakingly difficult • Donor support to governance reform has been ineffective • Donor driven reforms • Politically uninformed • Overloaded reform agendas • Ridiculous time horizons • Poor attention to change management & process issues • Can governance indicators help?

  3. A superfluous sticker? “If you think there are problems with the data, try without it…” - That has worked quite well for governance development for several hundred years –so what is the new offer?

  4. A solution looking for a problem? “‘Governance’ functions as umbrella concept, focusing on factors which are associated with present-day OECD countries.” OECD: Survey of Donor Approaches to Governance Assessment, February 2008

  5. Through a looking glass darkly? • Voigt: “Internally vs. externally sanctioned institutions” - “Political institutions determine economic institutions“ • Kaufmann: “What To Measure: Rules or Outcomes?” • Kray: “some areas of governance have particularly clear and unambiguous definitions: “Corruption is the use of public office for private gain”” • Etc: Rule of law, elections, transparency – assuming citizenship rather than sovereign-subject-relationships?

  6. Understanding…nothing?? Measuring the difference…? Desired reality Current reality ..or understanding reality…?

  7. “Realist” alternatives 1: other data!

  8. Realist alternatives 2: Benchmarks within reach Attainable, attractive vision Desired reality Current reality …matching power behind reform, current governance configuration and domestic capacity to change

  9. Example: PEFA • 31 potential PEFA “compliance gaps” – where to start? Indicators give no answer – but may add to overload risk • Still risk of solution-driven standards: “PI 12 - Multi-year perspective in fiscal planning, expenditure policy and budgeting” • Legitimacy risk: Mainly donor-developed, donor executed

  10. Ways forward – action & research • Specific benchmarks, co-developed with partner countries and the professions (Example: JV Procurement) • Combine “good enough practices” (benchmarks) with “good enough fit” (political economy, sequencing) • Temper beliefs in magic of evidence based and indicator-driven policy approaches – it sells, but not yet much evidence (sic!) that it works.

More Related