110 likes | 222 Views
Thursday, August 06, 2009. Inspection Report. Disclaimer The results of this analysis and forecastings are believed to be reliable but are not to be construed as providing a warranty, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for purpose, or representation
E N D
Thursday, August 06, 2009 Inspection Report Disclaimer The results of this analysis and forecastings are believed to be reliable but are not to be construed as providing a warranty, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for purpose, or representation for which INUS Technology, Inc. assumes legal responsibility. Users should undertake sufficient verification and iterative testing to determine the suitability of any information presented. Nothing herein is to be taken as permission, inducement or recommendation by INUS Technology, Inc. to practice any patented invention without a license or to in any way infringe upon the intellectual property rights of any other party.
Test Setup 4 inch gauge block. NIST traceable measurment. Reference spheres used for alignment
Scanning Top: Scanner setup in stereo mode with two 1.3 MP cameras and a 1024x768 projector with a 12 inch diagonal field of view. Right: 11 scans taken, aligned to reference spheres then globally aligned based on mesh geometry (both processes automatic).
Mesh Retriangulated/merged mesh. Note: The accuracy of the length of the gauge block scan is directly effected by alignment accuracy since only one of the two faces can be captured in any individual scan. Deleted unnecessary data. Resultant measured data consists of 33,882 points.
Conclusions The test data presented above show an overall length measurement (3D GD&T1), 16 reference point deviations and a whole shape deviation color map where green indicates measured data within +0.001” Concluding Alignment Accuracy (worst case) = +0.001”