830 likes | 1.1k Views
Curriculum Council November 20, 2013. Betsy A. Baker, Ed.D . Director, Continuous School Improvement bbaker@ciu10.org. Chapter 4 revisions - regulatory review. background. 2010- Ch. 4 included Common Core & Keystones as part of graduation requirement including 1/3 of the grade
E N D
Curriculum CouncilNovember 20, 2013 Betsy A. Baker, Ed.D. Director, Continuous School Improvement bbaker@ciu10.org
background 2010- Ch. 4 included Common Core & Keystones as part of graduation requirement including 1/3 of the grade Current Regs. under review “tweaked” graduation requirements and updated CCS to PA Core
Independent regulatory review commission (IRRC) • IRRC Public Meeting & Vote on Proposed Changes to Chapter 4 - November 21st • Full Day Session • 3 Minutes/Presenter • 5 IRRC Members Vote: • 2 appointed by Democrats • 2 appointed by Republicans • 1 appointed by the Governor • IRRC website
consequences IRRC must approve the entire regulation or vote it down Yes Vote -> Regs get published in Bulletin No Vote -> State Board has 40 days to respond Second No Vote ->Legislature Can Get Involved Consequences -- if Chapter 4 revisions fail
CP UPDATE • A process has been established for using Comprehensive Planning under the Revised Ch. 4 Planning Requirements • System Guiding Questions have been revised to align with • SAS components, • Framework for Teaching, • Framework for Leading, and • Turnaround Principles • Additional offline planning tools that support Root Cause Analysis have been developed for the enhancement of the Guided Planning Structure within the CP web app • Special Ed Training for Phase 3 Districts is currently being conducted across the state
CP UPDATE • Additional New Developments Include: • Special Ed Revision Notice (SEPRN) functionality • Data import process to bring in SPP designations instead of AYP • Printing information from the archives • Charter school ability to submit improvement plans via web application • EdNAimport process • Title 1 Schoolwide program planning addendum added to school level plan • Changes are not expected to take effect for a few months and should not impact the Phase 2 and 3 planning processes.
Spp Updates • Public Release Is Scheduled for December 9 • Related PVAAS Updates Are Expected in Early January • Designations Are “In Flux” Due to School Closings • At least 12 and up to 20 Priority/Focus schools were closed and that will impact the list • 50% change of population = New School or Closed School • Superintendents are required to inform PDE • EdNA data should be updated annually • Designation Letters Have Not Yet Been Sent • Letters Should Go Out at Thanksgiving
Webinars for pilot school administrators Remaining TWO sessions: • Thursday, Nov 21st – 9:00-11:30am • Friday, Nov 22nd – 9:00-11:30am
WEBINARS For ALL leas • “A Look at Teacher Specific Reporting” webinars for SY13-14 statewide implementation for admin and teachers NOT in the PILOT • View LIVE or archived webinar • January 9th2:00-3:30pm • January 17th9:00-10:30am • January 23rd9:00-10:30am
Two New Virtual Learning Modules • Free, online professional development • Access through PVAAS website • 2 NEW Modules • Teacher Reports • Admin Reports
Other helpful virtual Learning modules Introduction to Measuring Academic Growth (12-13 min) Concept of Growth: Connections to Value-Added Reporting (30 min)
Misconceptions Addressed • Common Misunderstandings • Are YOU ready to respond/discuss? • Available on PVAAS login page • https://pvaas.sas.com
Guide to pilot teacher SPECIFIC reporting Coming Soon! Available by release of PILOT Teacher Specific reporting on December 2nd
SY13-14 + SY14-15 + SY15-16= 1st PVAAS 3 Year Rolling Average in SY15-16
SY14-15 + SY15-16 + SY16-17= Next PVAAS 3 Year Rolling Average in SY16-17
PILOT Reporting Release • Nov 11 • PILOT District Admin • 1 per PILOT LEA • PILOT School Admin • 1 per PILOT School • Dec 2 • PILOT Teachers • Reports will NOT be saved in the PVAAS system! • Print/Save if you want them… before SY13-14 teacher reporting is released in Fall 2014!
Two categories of reports • Administrator reports • Teacher reports
Types of Reports for Administrators • District Summary • PILOT reporting for all LEA PILOT teachers • School Summary • PILOT reporting for all School PILOT teachers • Teacher Lists • Teacher Search Feature
District Summary (PILOT)
School Summary (PILOT)
Types of Teacher Level Reporting Single Year, Multiple Grades/Subjects/Courses • Teacher Summary Reports • Value-Added Summary • Diagnostic Summary Multiple Years, Single Grade/Subject/Course • Currently one year of reporting • Teacher Value-Added Report • Diagnostic Report Single Year, Single Subject/Grade/Course • User Defined • Custom Diagnostic
Teacher Value Added Summary (PILOT) 1 Year, Multiple Subjects/Grades/Courses
Teacher Value Added (PILOT) Multiple Years, 1 Subject/Grade/Course
Teacher Value Added (PILOT) Multiple Years, 1 Subject/Grade/Course
Diagnostic (PILOT) Multiple Years, 1 Subject/Grade/Course
Custom Diagnostic (PILOT) User Defined Group: 1 Year, 1 Subject/Grade/Course
Custom Diagnostic (PILOT) User Defined Group: 1 Year, 1 Subject/Grade/Course
From PDE Website:Administrative Manual • No conversion of PILOT reporting to the 0-3 scale • Below: Cross walk for the PVAAS 3 year rolling average
Teacher analysis • PVAAS Self-Reflection for Teacher • Teacher can use prior to meeting with principal • Use it to guide the conversation
Decisions Since Spring 2013 Roster Verification • Actual N Count = 11 Students • Cumulative Count - Per tested grade/subject/course • “Active” N Count = 6 Students • Similar in concept to an “FTE”; 6 “active” students • Example: 11 actual students, each claimed for 50% Instructional Responsibility, would equal 5.5 “active” students” – not enough “active” students for a teacher to get PVAAS teacher specific reporting in this subject/grade • Minimum Threshold for % Instructional Responsibility: 10% • All students need to be rostered • <10% will not be included in a teacher’s analyses
Questions for LEAs • Have the LEA staff responsible for EE met with your LEA staff responsible for PIMS/SIS? • Has your SIS vendor provided your LEA an update to the SIS system aligned to SY13-14 PIMS? • All teachers eligible for PVAAS in the SIS? • Scheduling Elementary Students in SIS? • All Keystone courses identified? • Structure for % Student + Teacher Enrollment in SIS? • Structure for % Full/Partial Instruction in SIS? • How do you plan to ensure consistency across the LEA? • % Instructional Responsibility needs discussed LEA wide
MORE QUESTIONS FOR LEAS • Awareness? • Do all district level admin know about Spring 2013 roster verification? • Do all school admin know about Spring 2013 roster verification? • Do the teachers eligible for PVAAS teacher specific reporting know about Spring 2013 roster verification? • Training? • When/how will district admin/school admin receive training on roster verification process and system? • When/how will teachers receive training on roster verification process and system? • Implementation? • When will teachers complete the roster verification process? • How will they be supported?
Semester LABELING forreports on keystone exams Performance Diagnostic Reports
Semester LABELING forreports on keystone exams Student Projection Report
Semester LABELING forreports on keystone exams Student History Report
Projection Summary to Keystone exams Before Now
Updates • Math Curriculum Framework • SLO Learning Community • Log In Go to “Teacher Tools” “My Communities” Join “SLO” • Assessment Creator • Curriculum Mapping – SAS Rollout?