450 likes | 639 Views
Reviews of the Thai health care systems and knowledge gaps for health system research. Phusit Prakongsai Somsak Chunharas International Health Policy Program (IHPP) Thai National Health Foundation (TNHF) Presentation to the meeting on Health System Research Collaboration
E N D
Reviews of the Thai health care systems and knowledge gaps for health system research Phusit Prakongsai Somsak Chunharas International Health Policy Program (IHPP) Thai National Health Foundation (TNHF) Presentation to the meeting on Health System Research Collaboration Pan Pacific Hotel, Bangkok 10 July 2009
What are we trying to do? • Build up (institutionalize) groups of researchers doing “health (services) system research” in Thailand • Ensure continuous funding for research in areas of high priority • Build network of researchers, users and funders • Many groups already exist and work with certain degree of coordination and support => addressing high priority issues, linking to policy and decision making, involving the public, ensuring continuous funding and capacity building
What are we talking about today? • Health system research vs health services research? • Health services “system” (design and organization/governance) vs health services/care (delivery). • Health services system components (6 components as proposed by WHO) • Implications (utilization of research results) • Policy development (financing, governance, HRH, technology, HIS) • Health services delivery practices (model, technology use, • Health services management ( HR management, IT management)
Outline of presentation • The past decades of health system development and current context • The extension of social protection • Burden of disease (BOD) in 1999 and 2004 • Economic crisis and pandemic of new emerging diseases • Health system building blocks framework • Health service delivery • Health workforce • Health information system • Medical products & technologies • Health care financing • Equity and efficiency • Conclusions on knowledge gaps of health system research
Health system development and the extension of social protection • Almost three decades of the long march through piecemeal social protection extensions: • 1975 Low income scheme 1990s social welfare + elderly, children <12, disabled – tax financed supply side subsidies. • 1980 CSMBS for public sector employee + dependants—tax financed non-contributory • 1983 CBHI 1994 voluntary public subsidies insurance, 50/50 • 1991 SHI for private employee—pay roll tax financed tripartite, capitation contract model • By 2001, 30% of 60m population still uninsured • By April 2002, fully achieved universal coverage • All residual population--non-SHI and non-CSMBS were covered 5
Historical evolution: Infrastructure development + financial protection extension Establishment of prepayment schemes User fees Informal user fee exemption 1945 Expansion consolidation of prepayment schemes 1970 1975 LIC 1980 CSMBS 1-3rd NHP 1962-76 Provincial hospitals 1990 SSS 1980 1983 CBHI SSS CSMBS LIC MWS Universal Coverage 1990 4th -5th NHP (1977-86) District hospitals Health centers 1994 Pub VHI SSS 2000 2002 full achieve Universal Coverage CSMBS Health Infrastructure extension--wide geographical coverage 2002
Current context • Good news: • Achieving universal coverage with improved financial risk protection and health equity, • Achieving all MDG targets, • Establishment of a number of autonomous organizations regarding health sector reform: HSRI, NHSO, THPF, NHCO, HISRO, HITAP, etc. • Bad news: • Economic crisis and decrease in GDP of the country, • Political instability, • The pandemic of new emerging infectious diseases e.g. SARS, H5N1, H1N1, • Unsuccessful containment of tuberculosis, • Poor governance of the health sector as well as other sectors, • Lack of leadership since UC reform, MOPH leaders strongly resist to reform, totally loss financial command to NHSO • Lack of strong units in PS Office/ Departments to generate evidence • Lack of vision and no systematic training of new cadres of qualified managers in long term
Top ten DALY loss among Thais in 2004 % of Total 52.6 42.8 Note – The number of total DALY loss increased from 9.5 million DALY loss in 1999 to 9.9 million DALY loss in 2004 Source: Thai BOD Study 2004
Prevalence of drinking alcohol by educational level 2001-2006
Prevalence of drinking alcohol by income quintile, 2001-2006
System building blocks of a health system: its aims and desirable attributes Source: WHO. Everybody business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action.2007, Geneva, World Health Organization.
Health service delivery:Better coverage of essential vaccines, ARV and condom use Percentage of female sex worker consistently use condom when having sex with general client in the past 1 month, 1995 – 2007 Compulsory licensing Include ART in UC package Generic production of triple ART
Thailand Current situation and challenges of human resources for health in Thailand Source: World Development Indicator 2002 and World Health Report 2006
Physicians Dentists 800-3,305 3,306-6,274 6,245-9,272 9,243-12,300 5,500-15,143 15,144-25,767 25,768-36,390 36,391-47,011 Nurses Pharmacists 280 - 652 653 - 904 905 - 1,156 1,157 – 1,408 4,600-8,432 8,433-12,274 12,275-16,115 16,116-19,956 Inequity in geographical distribution of Health workforce in 2007
Child mortality in Thailand from various sources of surveys Source: Hill et al. Int J Epidemiol 2007 (with updates)
Comparison between broad causes of death from vital registration (VR) and verbal autopsy(VA)
Health care finance and service provision of Thailand after achieving universal coverage (UC) General tax General tax Standard Benefit package Tripartite contributions Payroll taxes Risk related contributions Capitation Capitation & global Co-payment budget with DRG for IP Services Fee for services Fee for services - OP Ministry of Finance - CSMBS (6 million beneficiaries) National Health Insurance Office The UC scheme (47 millions of pop.) Social Security Office - SSS (9 millions of formal employees) Voluntary private insurance Public & Private Contractor networks Population Patients
The incidence of catastrophic health payments from 2000 to 2007 Note:Catastrophic health expenditure refers to household out-of-pocket payments for health exceed 10% of household consumption expenditure
Total health expenditure 1994-2005 Total health expenditure during 2003-2005 ranged from 3.49 to 3.55% of GDP, THE per capita approx 100 USD
Health care expenditure in Thailand by function in 2001 and 2005
Household consumption: tobacco, alcohol and healthMedian household expenditure per month Sources: Analyses from 2006 SES
The distribution of ambulatory service use among different income quintiles in 2001 and 2003, by types of health facilities 2003 2001 Concentration index Source: Prakongsai P et al. Assessing the impact of a policy on universal coverage on financial risk protection, health care finance, and benefit incidence of the Thai health care system. Presentation to the 6th IHEA World Congress, July 2007, Copenhagen
Equity in utilization: Concentration Index OP service by levels: 2001 to 2007 Note: CI range from -1 to + 1. Minus 1 (plus 1 ) means in favour of the poor (rich), or the poor (rich) disproportionately use more services than the rich (poor). 31
Equity in utilization: Concentration Index IP service by levels: 2001 to 2007 32
Equity in budget subsidies: BIA, 2001 and 2003 • Note: • Overall net government health subsidies in 2001 were approximately 58,733 million Baht, and in 2003 were 80,678 million Baht (in 2001-value) • The concentration index of government health subsidies in 2001 was -0.044 and in 2003 was -0.123
RR = 2.8 (95% CI 2.5-3.0) 55% (39%-68%) reduction RR = 1.8 (95% CI 1.6-2.0) Equity in health:Child mortality by economic status Error bars are 95% CIs Source: Vapattanawong P, Hogan MC, Hanvoravongchai P, Gakidou E, Vos T, Lopez AD, Lim SS. Reductions in child mortality levels and inequalities in Thailand: analysis of two censuses. Lancet 2007; 369:850-855
Inefficiency of the Thai health care system:CSBMS expenditure from 1989 to 2008, current year price Note: Expenditure for 2008 is extrapolated from 6 months actual spending Source: Ministry of Finance, Comptroller Generals Department, various years
Inequity in quality and patterns of health service provision:Percentage of caesarian section to total deliveriesby health insurance schemes Source: Electronic claim database of inpatients from National Health Security Office, 2004-2006 (N=13,232,393 hospital admissions)
Inequity in quality and patterns of health service provision:Propensity of receiving single source antiplatelets clopidogrel, cilostazol: 6 regional hospitals
Discussion – Key concerns in HSD (1) • An increasing disease burden from chronic NCD and the situation of aging society, => what needs to be changed wrt financing model and service delivery model/practices? (F, D) • Inequitable health risk distribution among different SE groups, => alternative model for financing, resource allocation and service purchasing (F) • Inefficiency and inequitable access to good quality of health services among beneficiaries of different health insurance schemes, => should we have a single system with multiple fund manager? How else could be improve inefficiency, inequitable access and quality/safety? (G, D) • Poor governance of health systems in Thailand, => what roles and functions and relationship should be like between 4 major organizations in health system (MOPH, NHSO, NHCO, HPF) (G)
Discussion – Key concerns in HSD (2) • The unknown impact of current economic crisis on health of the population (F, G, D) • The internationalization of health care seeking => should Thailand develop itself as medical hub for international patients? (G, F, HRH) • The pandemic of new emerging infectious disease and unsuccessful control of tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, => does it have to do with financing model, HRH quantity and quality, or management capacity? (D, G, HRH) • Maldistribution and internal brain drain of HRH. => what policy options should be adopted, separating HRH payment from service purchasing package? (HRH) • Complex and inefficient HIS (multiple purchasers and MOPH line of command) => standardization will help? What else should be done? Humanware? (HIS) • Access to & more efficient use of (new) technology => CL and R&D investment for local production of health tech, and R&D for national health priority? (Technology) => the future role of HiTap? (G) how to influence cost-effective use of technology (D)
Potential areas for research collaboration between Thai partners and AHSPR (1) • Effective health and non-health interventions towards NCD which is an increasing BOD in Thailand and many developing countries, • Policy recommendations for the Thai government through the 10th national Development Plan, • Reorientation of public resources towards health promotion and disease prevention of disease burden priorities e.g. • HIV/AIDS, • road traffic injuries, • Obesity / overweight and inadequate activity and exercise, • tobacco and alcohol consumption, • Social determinants of health (SDH)
Potential areas for research collaboration between Thai partners and AHSPR (2) • Improving equitable quality and patterns of health service provision among beneficiaries of different health insurance schemes provider payment reform, • Harmonization of benefit package and provider payment methods among three public health insurance schemes, • Effective health interventions to tackle mal-distribution and internal brain drain of HRH, • Economic impact on health of the population, • Sustainability of health care finance in Thailand, • Improving efficiency and rational drug use of the Thai health care system, • Improving health information system in Thailand, • Enhancing regulatory capacity and governance of the Thai health care system.
Your ideas/suggestion • Which area/issues are of high priority? • How should we go about doing it? • Potential researchers • Needs for new capacity in research • Funding for research • Institutional backup => what should be the role of IHPP, HFRO,HISO, HRO, CHEM, other faculties in universities? • International collaboration • Research conduct (technical collaboration) • Capacity building • Research funding – how should we go about?