360 likes | 676 Views
SHELLFISH CULTURE AND NATURE CONSERVATION. Aad Smaal Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies Yerseke, NL. IMARES: NEW INSTITUTE Former Fishery Institute merged with 2 other groups ENVIRONMENT FISHERY AQUACULTURE Shellfish Research, Yerseke
E N D
SHELLFISH CULTURE AND NATURE CONSERVATION Aad Smaal Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies Yerseke, NL
IMARES: NEW INSTITUTE Former Fishery Institute merged with 2 other groups ENVIRONMENT FISHERY AQUACULTURE Shellfish Research, Yerseke - population dynamics - carrying capacity - culture innovation North Sea Delta
PROBLEMS IN CULTURE AND CONSERVATION • Shellfish culture / fisheries always has an impact on the • ecosystem • Shellfish culture occurs often in areas that are now • protected for nature conservation • What are the impacts, positive / negative, acceptable ? • Source of conflicts between stakeholders • Role of science / politics / governments
OUTLINE • ROLE OF SHELLFISH IN THE SYSTEM • IMPACTS OF CULTURE • REGULATION • STAKEHOLDERS • CONSERVATION and EXPLOITATION
ROLE OF SHELLFISH Food Habitat Feedbacks
Oosterschelde case: storm surge barrier • Residence time > • Water transparency > • Nutrient loads < • Internal nutrient cycles more important • Adaptation of phytoplankton • Maintenance of primary production Analysis of the role of mussels in the ecosystem: benthic tunnels, mesocosms, models Prins & Smaal, 1994; Prins et al, 1998; Smaal et al, 2001
Nutrient (N) regeneration through direct excretion + biodeposit mineralization up to 40 % of total N regeneration
Bottom-up control at low mussel density and top-down control at high mussel density Through grazing increase in phyto plankton turnover ; optimal mussel growth at intermediate biomass
FUNCTIONAL ROLE: • Grazing of phytoplankton • Production of biodeposits • Regeneration of nutrients • Promotion of algal growth • Stabilization of the ecosystem • feedbacks through filter feeding
FOOD FOR BIRDS: • shellfish beds are essential as food source for waders and diving ducks • shellfish stocks may show large variability in time • birds may switch prey • collapse of both mussel and cockle stocks caused problemsin Wadden Sea and Wash in ’90
Mussel stock(index) Cockle stock Eider duck mortality 1991 Call for shellfishery policy
Oystercatcher decrease after low shellfish stocks 1996 due to severe winter
CONCLUSION FOOD • FOR BIRDS • Shellfish is major resource • Minimum stock required for longterm maintenance of • bird populations • high shellfish dynamics sometimes don’t match bird needs • call for protective measures
HARVEST IN NL FROM CULTURE AND FISHERY MUSSEL: 100 MLN KG COCKLE: 20 MLN KG OYSTER: 3 MLN KG
ROLE AS HABITAT Biocoenose (Mobius, 1880) Epibenthic shellfish beds form structures nr of species > 150 (Sayer, 2002) Biodiversity higher in sublitoral (Buchsbaum & Sayer, 2003) Impact of culture ?
IMPACTS OF SHELLFISH CULTURE Feedbacks impact on Stocks Food Habitat direct: bottom culture – infauna (clams, cockles) - epifauna (mussels, oysters) indirect: suspended culture
IMPACTS on STOCKS SHELLFISH FLOW natural spatfal natural spatfal WILD SUBLITORAL STOCK WILD LITORAL STOCK harvest Seed fishery CULTURE PLOTS RESULT: NET INCREASE OF BIOMASS
IMPACTS on STOCKS • Case study : Wadden Sea • bottom culture • Model calculation wild beds vs culture plots: • Musselseed plots/wild • - Growth 1.7 x higher • Density 0.6 • Mortality 0.8 • Net result: stock – harvest 1.15: 15 % more biomass • Note: Carrying capacity problems due to overstocking
IMPACTS on HABITAT • Bottom culture: • Culture of mussels and oysters • on bottom plots, • frequent fishery activities • effects on biodiversity depend on • local conditions • Culture / fishery of infauna : • sediment change ? • mortality of bycatch ? • less spatfal ? • many studies • controversial issue • ban on cockle fishery Waddensea 2003 Wild bed sand Cultureplots muddy sub (Von Westphalen, 2005) Impact of cockle fishery (van Gils et al, 2004)
Seed fishery on wild beds Mussels : focus on unstable beds Littoral : experimental seed fishery to test impact on stability: no net effect of fishery on seed mussel density Sublittoral : research topic Major issue in actual discussion in NL
IMPACTS on HABITAT • Suspended culture: • Sediment deposition • depomod application • mostly for fish farming • useful for shellfish • (no external input, only concentrating material) • Benthic community • various studies: (Grant et al, 2005; DEPOMOD) • - local scale effects • - depend on hydrodynamics, site etc • - can both enhance or reduce species nr
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS Stocks: AVERAGE INCREASE Habitats: bottom culture / seed fishery epifauna BIODIVERSITY HABITAT COMPLEXITY infauna SEDIMENT/BENTHOS suspended culture SEDIMENT/BENTHOS
POLICY & REGULATION • NATIONAL: policy document 2004 • “Space for harvest” • sustainable use • innovation by industry, less impacts • - closed areas • EU: Bird and Habitat Directive (implementation NL 2004) • For nature conservation areas • in many cases shellfish culture areas • permit required for each seed fishery period (2x p yr) • industry has to perform an appropriate assessment • of possible impacts on management objectives • - permits can be stopped by court after objections
Profit continuous improvement People Planet • STAKEHOLDERS • INDUSTRY RESPONSE • triple P approach : Profit, Planet, People • = continuous improvement • = planning + evaluation + research • = draws up fishing plans, • = uses black boxes onboard fishing vessels • = register activities in an electronic logbook • Develop an innovation agenda • Stakeholder involvement • Setting up research: innovation
HATCHERY PRODUCT SEED COLLECTORS WILD SEED FISHERY INNOVATION: life cycle control
MUSSEL SEED HATCHERY/ COLLECTORS NURSERY
STAKEHOLDERS • NGO RESPONSE • objected against seed fishery permits • case in court in spring and autumn • court decision: fishery could go on • BACKGROUND • Nature conservation areas should not be exploited
Editorial in PloS Biology of Nov 14, 2006 based on culture conservation restoration X ?
NATURE CONSERVATION STRATEGIES • Protection against adverse impacts • Conservation of non-impacted areas • Prevention of new impacts • Habitat restoration • Habitat creation • Multi-functional use • Sustainable use Static / spontaneous exclusion mitigation integration Dynamic / control
PARADOX OF EXTENSIVE EXPLOITATION • extensive exploitation is part of nature and contributes to • ecosystem processes (food, feedback, habitat) • exploitation depends on natural dynamics and farmers • want to become less dependent • nature conservationists want to restrict exploitation • 2 forces in the direction of intensification • more intensive culture in existing areas calls for more • criticism • loss of extensive culture • future need for shellfish restoration
* Join us in the 10th ICSR07 In Zeeland *