1 / 22

Initial fields and instabilities in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision

Initial fields and instabilities in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision. Kenji Fukushima (RIKEN BNL Research Center). Outline. Assume the McLerran-Venugopalan model as a classical model of the heavy-ion collision.

balin
Download Presentation

Initial fields and instabilities in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Initial fields and instabilitiesin the classical modelof the heavy-ion collision Kenji Fukushima(RIKEN BNL Research Center) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  2. Outline • Assume the McLerran-Venugopalan model as a classical model of the heavy-ion collision. • Calculate the initial energy density at early times analytically in the MV model. • Perturb the CGC background with rapidity dependent fluctuations. July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  3. What and why the MV model? • Preparation (two kinetic variables) • Transverse Momentum Q2 Transverse resolution (size inverse) of partons • Bjorken's x Longitudinal fraction of parton momentum High Energy Hadron Target July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  4. Going to smaller x with fixed Q2 • Gluon increases with a fixed transverse area • Graphically small-x Dense Gluon Matter July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  5. Going to larger Q2 with fixed x • Gluon slowly increases with a decreasing area • Graphically, in the same way, • When does the distribution come to overlap? large Q Dilute Gluon Matter Gluons with kt<< Qs(x)are saturated. July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  6. Dense-Dense Scattering • Scattering amplitude in the Eikonal approx. Dense Target Dense Projectile July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  7. Classical approximation • Stationary-point approximation Stationary-point approx. is made at July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  8. Equations of Motion • Coordinates • Equations to be solved (in At =0 gauge) h t July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  9. Boundary Conditions • Two-source problem ? July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  10. McLerran-Venugopalan Model • Gaussian weight • Once A is known, observables like the field energies are calculable in unit of m. • Two steps: solve A[rt,rp] and take mx is related to Qs(x) larger m = larger r = dense gluons = larger Qs July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  11. Parameter Choice • Model parameter for RHIC • Classical description works till t ~1/Qs~ 0.1fm • Conventional choice is g2m = 2GeV and as = 1/pby Krasnitz, Nara, Venugopalan, Lappi, Romatschke, Kapusta, Fries ... We focus on "soft" physics pt ~1GeV. c.f. "hard" physics = pQCD Q0, x0, l from DIS July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  12. We are set . . . in principle • We have formulated the model. • We have fixed the model parameters. • In principle, we are set . . . July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  13. Initial fields at t = 0 • Longitudinal fields • Order t 0 • Transverse fields are vanishing Only Longitudinal Only Transverse Only Transverse July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  14. What happens if expanded in t • Transverse fields become non-vanishing • Order t2 • Similar in Longitudinal fields Expansion not in t/m but in t /a ! c.f. Fries-Kapusta-Li ('06) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  15. Log-Ansatz • Naive expansion reads • Log-ansatz July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  16. Results • Ansatz works e ~ 130GeV/fm350GeV/fm3 (L1/LQCD) c.f. t ~1fme ~ 5.1GeV/fm3 t ~ 0.1fm K.F.('07) c.f. T.Lappi ('06) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  17. Instability ? • So far, we have established the CGC solution which is boost invariant with no h dependence. • QUESTION:What happens if small fluctuations depending on h exist in the initial state ? • ANSWER:(Some of)h depending modes exponentially grow as a function of t. Romatschke-Venugopalan ('05) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  18. Linearized Equations of Motion • Expand in dAi • Solutions • l > 0 • l < 0 l (for t indep. l) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  19. Initial CGC Fields • Instability "Tendency" • The background is frozen at t =0 for simplicityand consider the time evolution of fluctuations. Oscillatory modes dominant around the mean fields. l disperses including l <0 Ensemble average over CGC contains contributions with l <0 July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  20. Initial Fluctuations • In Fourier space (dAi)2 ~ 1/n KF-Gelis-McLerran ('06) (dEi)2 ~ n Same order of magnitude July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  21. After ensemble average Initially oscillatory is predominant. Afterwards, exponentiallygrowing modes with l <0whose weight was smallinitially as become dominant. K.F.('07) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

  22. Summary • Classical description works in the heavy-ion collision till t ~1/Qs (~ 0.1fm at RHIC). • Initial fields are calculable analytically with the log-ansatz. • Unstable modes grow up. • CGC fields evolve as times goes.  neglected • Real instability should be weaker? or stronger?? • Dynamical problem is very interesting!(under investigation) July 2007 at ETD-HIC

More Related