280 likes | 446 Views
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE. DOD STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN FY 20 05/06. By Mr A. Visser Chief Director Strategic Management. 15 March 2005. DOD. AIM. To brief the PCD/JSCD on the DOD Strategic Business Plan for FY05/06 before it is tabled in Parliament in April 2005. DOD.
E N D
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE DOD STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN FY2005/06 By Mr A. Visser Chief Director Strategic Management 15 March 2005 DOD
AIM To brief the PCD/JSCD on the DOD Strategic Business Plan for FY05/06 before it is tabled in Parliament in April 2005 DOD
SCOPE • Timelines • Background • DOD Programmes • Risks per Programme • Options for Funding • Discussion DOD
TIMELINES DOD
Cycles vs. Financial Years Legend: 0 = Year of Expenditure 0-1= One Year prior to Year of Expenditure 0-2 = Two Years prior to Year of Expenditure 0+1 = One Year after Year of Expenditure
BACKGROUND • The earliest draft DOD Strategic Business Plan FY05/06 was presented to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on 01 Feb 05. • Plan was presented to and approved by the Defence Staff Council (DSC) on 23 Feb 05. • DOD Budget presented to Portfolio Committee on Defence on 08 Mar 05 • Plan will be tabled in Parliament on 08 Apr 05. • Programme Structure remains generally the same, except Force Employment (formerly called Command & Control - Joint Ops) DOD
Background… • Focus: • Conclusion of the First Decade of Democracy • First Year of Second Decade of Democracy • Progress on Strategic Defence Package (SDP) weapon systems • Overview by the SecDef & CSANDF separate. • Reference to Parys Resolutions (Strategic Decisions), including new DOD Vision & Defence Update • Minister of Defence’s Strategic Guidelines • Defence Strategy is still in process • Plan is in process of being printed DOD
DOD PROGRAMMES DOD
BACKGROUND • 316 Risks listed in SBPs • 76 Identified as DOD risks • 37 Identified as critical • 14 Options based on 37 risks developed • Options prioritised and top 4 selected • Presented to MTEC • Partially funded by NT DOD
IMPLICATIONS • Ammunition Disposal – Lack of safety of depots and personnel due to unstable ammunition. • Maintenance of Facilities - Non-compliance with Occupational Health and Safety Act, which may result in closure of facilities. • Integration of SDPs – SDP vessels not fully accepted to design specifications. • Health Legislation – Cannot comply with pharmaceutical regulations and building of depots. DOD
OPTIONS NOT FUNDED • DFR – MA Alignment (RM28) • SAAF – Inkwazi (RM20) • Spec Forces – Recruiting and equipping (RM6) • SA Army – MSDS (RM107) • SA Army – Ammo stock levels (RM93 or RM332) • SA Navy – Compliance with stat prescripts (RM80) • SAAF – Air base infrastructure (RM157) • MLS – Pers retention (RM8) • SAAF – YPT runway (RM25) DOD
REQUIREMENTS: MTEF 2005/06 • Additional RM183, RM254 and RM288 provided by NT. • Four options developed
INTERNAL FUNDING DOD
OPTION 1 - AMMUNITION DISPOSAL Additional Funding of Rm5 to be utilised as follows: • Registration of project for Disposal Plant • Disposal of critically unstable ammo iaw approved disposal plan • Preparation of dilapidated demolition ranges and capabilities The ammunition will be disposed of through conventional methods at approved demolition ranges. However, in the continued absence of a dedicated Disposal Plant the serious risks at Jan Kemp Dorp and De Aar still remain
OPTION 2 - FACILITIES Additional Funding of Rm10 to be utilised as follows: • Priorities were indicated to National Department of Public Works (NDPW) • NDPW will propose options to DOD in April 2005 • DOD will then instruct NDPW on utilisation of funds The following risks still remain: • Lack of operational readiness and service delivery • Possible closure of units due to Occupational Health and Safety Act • Low morale due to unsafe and unsatisfactory working conditions
OPTION 3 - INTEGRATION OF SDPs (SA Navy) Additional Funding of Rm26 to be utilised as follows: Corvettes • Support contracts Rm1 • Qualification and acceptance trials Rm10 • Running costs Rm5,5 • Facility upgrades Rm3,5 Submarines • Additional spares and support equipment Rm2,5 • Support contracts Rm3,5 Total Rm26 Balance of risks to be managed through Risk Abatement Plan
RISK ABATEMENT PLAN • Operational units at lower levels of readiness • Disposal sale of OTQ (RM 50) to operating budget • Strict discipline with ammo and fuel usage • Non-replacement of missiles fired • Re-phasing of activities
OPTION 4 - HEALTH LEGISLATION Additional Funding of Rm20 to be utilised as follows: • Changes to the Medical Health Depot to comply with the Pharmacy Act – Rm10 • Changes to pharmacies to comply with the Pharmacy Act – Rm10 The following risks still remain: • Depot not fully compliant with legislation • Shortage of ambulances and vehicles required for clinical care • Non-replacement of main medical equipment (Sonars, X-rays, scanners, etc) • Security at facilities These risks will be mitigated to some extent through internal reprioritisation
SUMMARY • Alignment with Government Priorities (Ten-Year Review and SONA) • Maintenance of the SANDF core capabilities • Strategic Defence Packages (Integration into SANDF) • Peace Support Operations(Support Govt Initiatives and ASF) • Departmental Risks(37 risks -14 Options- 4 funded by NT) • Strategic Decisions (Parys Resolutions) DOD
DISCUSSION DOD