160 likes | 178 Views
Explore the tension between human ambition and the consequences of our actions in the fields of science and technology. This book examines the history of science, technology, and society, as well as the cultural appropriation and societal impact of GMOs, nano-appropriate technology, globalization, sustainability, entrepreneurship, scientific citizenship, foresight, and technoscience. It delves into the underlying tension, methods for dealing with it, and the transition from science to technoscience. Cultural assessment of science and technology is emphasized, along with the importance of making STS (Science and Technology Studies) matter.
E N D
Hubris and Hybridsin Science and Society Andrew Jamison
A Brief History of STS 1970s – science, technology and society - building bridges acrosss the two cultures 1980s – science, technology and strategy - story-lines of economic innovation 1990s – science and technology studies - story-lines of social construction 2000s – science, technology, and sustainability - story-lines of cultural appropriation
Hubris and Hybrids hubris: ”impious disregard of the limits governing human action in an orderly universe” hybrids: ”offspring of parents that differ in genetically determined traits”
Hubris and Hybrids in S&T GMOs, nano appropriate technology globalization sustainability entrepreneurship scientific citizenship foresight cultural assessment technoscience green knowledge
The Underlying Tension ”When we look at modern man, we have to face the fact that modern man suffers from a kind of poverty of the spirit which stands in glaring contrast to his scientific and technological abundance. We’ve learned to fly the air like birds, we’ve learned to swim the seas like fish, but we haven’t learned to walk the earth like brothers and sisters.” Martin Luther King, Jr
Dealing with the Tension • educating phronesis, or moral judgment • telling stories of appropriation • focusing on contexts of use • providing a cultural assessment of S&T • making STS matter
Cultural Appropriation • At a discursive, or macro level • structural and cognitive transformations • At an organizational, or meso level • processes of institutionalization • At a personal, or micro level • practices of habituation and use
The Age of Technoscience • blurring discursive boundaries • between science (episteme) and technology (techne) • breaking down institutional borders • between public and private, economic and academic • mixing skills and knowledge • across faculties, disciplines, and societal domains
From Science to Technoscience • change in range and scope • market orientation, global reach • university-industry collaboration • ”epistemic drift” (Elzinga) • the state as strategist: “picking the winners”
Transdisciplinarity ”Knowledge which emerges from a particular context of application with its own distinct theoretical structures, research methods and modes of practice but which may not be locatable on the prevailing disciplinary map.” Michael Gibbons et al, The New Production of Knowledge (Sage 1994, p168)
From Science to Research • from doing experiments to doing business • product-oriented, or commercial research • from providing expertise to governing • project-oriented, or governance research • from enlightening to empowering • problem-oriented, or advocacy research
Contending Discourses • commercial research: hubris goes to market - globalization, competitiveness, innovation • governance research: controlling hubris - welfare, employment, equality, construction • advocacy research: the hybrid imagination • global justice, scientific citizenship, sustainability
Contending Institutions • commercial research - innovation networks, patent systems, markets • governance research - state agencies, regulations, policies, laws • advocacy research - civic organizations, public education, assessment
Contending Identities • commercial research - academic entrepeneurs, market researchers • governance research - expert consultants, policy researchers • advocacy research - activist academics, action researchers
Cultural Assessment of S&T • Reflection: challenging the hype and the myths • and giving voice to the critics • Mediation: building bridges, making spaces • across cultures and subcultures • Engagement: doing change-oriented research • or cultural appropriation in action
The Hybrid Imagination • integrative, as opposed to specialized • contextual, as opposed to reductionist • connective, as opposed to innovative