1 / 16

Maximizing Entomological Monitoring ( EM) in Low Resource Settings

Maximizing Entomological Monitoring ( EM) in Low Resource Settings. Dereje Dengela Abt Associates. Building Local Capacity. November 15, 2012. Why is Maximizing EM Important?. Significant scale-up of insecticide-based vector control interventions in last 10 years

barney
Download Presentation

Maximizing Entomological Monitoring ( EM) in Low Resource Settings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maximizing Entomological Monitoring (EM) in Low Resource Settings Dereje Dengela Abt Associates Building Local Capacity November 15, 2012

  2. Why is Maximizing EM Important? • Significant scale-up of insecticide-based vector control interventions in last 10 years • May lead to changes in: • Susceptibility of vector to insecticides • Species composition • Vector behavior • EM helps: • monitor if there is any changes • assess entomological impact of vector control

  3. Entomological Monitoring(EM): Experience from AIRS Project Countries • Integral part of IRS projects in 15 countries under AIRS • Entomological indicators monitored • PMI primary indictors in all AIRS countries • Species of malaria vectors in intervention areas • Vector distribution and seasonality • Vector feeding time and location • Insecticide susceptibility • Quality assurance of IRS programs and persistence

  4. Entomological Monitoring(EM): Experience from AIRS Project Countries PMI Secondary Indicators in Some Countries • Identification of mosquito infectivity • Age grading • Blood meal analysis Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Ethiopia • Insecticide Resistance (IR) monitoring—important part of EM • EM conducted routinely

  5. How are EM data used for decisionmaking? • IR and insecticide persistence data—key inputs for IRS insecticide selection • conducted annually on four classes of insecticides • meeting organized and results presented to in-country partners • Decision usually made after detailed discussion • Persistence—time of spraying • Data on density, behavior, longevity, infectivity is being collected—will hopefully inform IRS program once completed

  6. Entomological Monitoring(EM) • Current EM mainly tied to AIRS project and designed to generate evidence for IRS programming • Good amount of data collected to serve the intended purpose of informing IRS • But might need to be revisited in view of addressing and responding to growing global threat of IR • In countries such as Mali, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, Burundi, and DRC, PMI moving towards collecting more representative data

  7. Local Capacity of AIRS Project Countries for EM • Technical Capacity • Currently most AIRS countries have good technical capacity to implement EM to inform IRS programming • Exceptions: Angola, Mozambique • PMI support instrumental in building this capacity over time • Examples: Mali, Ethiopia, Liberia • Some countries had capacity before PMI support • Examples: Benin, Senegal, BurkinaFaso

  8. Local Capacity of AIRS Project Countries for EM • Physical capacity/infrastructure for EM • There is at least one insectary in all AIRS project countries except Angola • Insectary could be owned by NMCP, research institutes, universities or the project

  9. Improving Local Capacity to Enhance EM • To build technical capacity • Entomologists are very scarce and rarely available in those countries with ongoing capacity challenges. • Can we take some temporary measures?

  10. Improving Local Capacity to Enhance EM • Strategy: Recruit health professional/malaria focal person, or even high school graduates • Within a few weeks, develop their capacity to carry out basic EM • Up to 10 days extensive training followed by mentoring in the field

  11. Improving Local Capacity

  12. Improving Local Capacity to Enhance EM • Examples from Angola and Mozambique: • Hired as junior entomology coordinators young, enthusiastic people (high school graduates) • One week intensive training • They then were attached for 1-2 weeks to experienced entomologist • Demonstrated ability to independently conduct susceptibility tests and send good quality data

  13. Improving Local Capacity • Physical infrastructure/Insectary • Insectary is key to sustain susceptibly mosquito colonies • Not the only place to rear wild mosquitoes for tests • The Ethiopia experience of IR: • Trained local technicians secure 1-2 rooms within nearest health facilities (if available) or rent hotel rooms • Collect larvae and pupaewith enough water from their aquatic habitats • Rear to adult in these rooms and perform the test in same place N.B.: Protect adult mosquitoes from ants and spiders

  14. Improving Local Capacity Physical infrastructure/Insectary • The Mali experience: Insectary in a Box • Cost effective and time saving • Fully served the purpose.

  15. Lessons Learned • In absence of entomologists, with proper training and mentoring, technicians can lead basic EM, including IR monitoring • Insectary not mandatory: For EM activities such as IR, field offices or hotel rooms can be used to rear mosquitoes and conduct tests • Where insectary is needed, we can build “insectary in a box” • Cost-effective, saves time

  16. Thank you!

More Related