590 likes | 743 Views
Principles of Neural Organization Lecture 3. KEYWORDS from Lecture 2. ACTION POTENTIALS 1 -- electrical stimulation (artificial depolarization) 2 -- spatial and temporal integration of EPSPs and IPSPs… Generator potential
E N D
Principles of Neural Organization Lecture 3
KEYWORDS from Lecture 2 • ACTION POTENTIALS • 1 -- electrical stimulation (artificial depolarization) • 2 -- spatial and temporal integration of EPSPs and IPSPs… Generator potential • 3 -- sensory stimulation (transduction), mechanical (cytoskeleton), chemical (receptors, second messengers), light (hyperpolarization) • modality (Müller's doctrine of specific nerve energies 1826; labelled line); • intensity (APs/sec; frequency coding; population coding; thresholds); • duration (rapidly and slowly adapting neurones) • location (absolute, two-point discrimination, topographical coding)
KEYWORDS from Lecture 2 (cont’d) Pacinian corpuscle, adequate stimulus, receptive fields, thalamus, cortex, sulcus, gyrus, brainstem, topographic (maps) representation, superior colliculus, inferior colliculus (those are the names of the bumps on the brain stem that deal with vision and hearing respectively), Brodmann, phrenology, areas of cortex: primary sensory areas (olfactory, somatosensory, visual, auditory), motor cortex, association cortices (parietal, inferotemporal, frontal)
BRAIN STEM FRONTAL PARIETAL INFEROTEMPORAL CEREBELLUM
Across pattern coding • can code more than one thing at the same time • can code ‘similarity’ • 2 stimuli coded as two stimuli (if sufficiently different) • Good for coding patterns • Population coding • only codes one thing • 2 stimuli --> smaller ignored • integration of activity means all neurones involved • Good for coding a single parameter such as direction • Specificity coding • can code more than one thing • 2 stimuli always coded as separate • each neurone acts alone (therefore vulnerable) • Good for coding patterns • Channel coding • only codes one thing • 2 stimuli perceived as 1 (different from either alone - metamer) • Good for extracting a single parameter in the presence of other potentially confusing factors.
Psychophysics section 2
PSYCHOPHYSICS DETECTION THRESHOLDS Section 1 method of limits method of constant stimuli method of adjustment Section 2 signal detection theory DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS Section 3 Weber’s Law Fechner’s Law Steven’s Power Law
PRECISION vs ACCURACY Method of limits bias of expectation bias of habituation staircase Method of constant stimuli 2AFC; 4AFC Method of adjustment rather variable “quick and dirty” 1. Multiple presentations 2. Staircase METHOD OF LIMITS
PRECISION vs ACCURACY Method of limits bias of expectation bias of habituation staircase Method of constant stimuli 2AFC; 4AFC Method of adjustment rather variable “quick and dirty” perfect performance half way between chance performance METHOD OF CONSTANT STIMULI
probability low firing rate high SPONTANEOUS ACTIVITY time
time probability low firing rate high GENTLE STIMULUS
“yes” “no” SIGNAL + NOISE NOISE Probability low firing rate high CRITERION
“yes” “no” Probability low firing rate high
gentle stimulus medium stimulus stronger stimulus
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY • sensory noise • criterion • stimulus magnitude • outcome matrix (hit/miss/false alarm/correct rejection)
RESPONSE “yes” “no” present 100% CORRECT HITS MISS STIMULUS FALSE ALARM CORRECT 100% absent
RESPONSE “yes” “no” present 100% CORRECT MISS 25% 75% STIMULUS FALSE ALARM CORRECT 100% absent 10% 90%
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY • sensory noise • criterion • stimulus magnitude • outcome matrix (hit/miss/false alarm/correct rejection) • receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC)
RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) 75% percentage of hits percentage of false alarms 10%
RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) more liberal percentage of hits more conservative percentage of false alarms
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY • sensory noise • criterion • stimulus magnitude • outcome matrix (hit/miss/false alarm/correct rejection) • receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) • from which we can measure your sensitivity
RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) your sensitivity percentage of hits percentage of false alarms
PSYCHOPHYSICS DETECTION THRESHOLDS Section 1 method of limits method of constant stimuli method of adjustment Section 2 signal detection theory DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS Section 3 Weber’s Law Fechner’s Law Steven’s Power Law
DIFFERENCE THRESHOLDS change in stimulus magnitude ΔI is constant WEBER’S LAW I stimulus magnitude
The difference threshold • just noticeable difference (jnd) • Weber’s law (1834) • the just noticeable increment is a constant fraction of the stimulus • Fechner’s law (1860) • sensation magnitude proportional to • logarithm (stimulus intensity) • assumption: all jnd’s are the same • stood for 100 years! • Weber Fractions • Taste 0.08 8% • Brightness 0.08 8% • Loudness 0.05 5% • Vibration 0.04 4% • Line length 0.03 3% • Heaviness 0.02 2% • Electric shock 0.01 1%
6 jnd 5 jnd 4 jnd perceived magnitude 3 jnd 2 jnd 1 jnd stimulus intensity Perceived magnitude log (intensity)
The difference threshold • just noticeable difference (jnd) • Weber’s law (1834) • the just noticeable increment is a constant fraction of the stimulus • Fechner’s law (1860) • sensation magnitude proportional to • logarithm (stimulus intensity) • assumption: all jnd’s are the same • stood for 100 years! • Steven’s law (1961) • (“To honour Fechner and repeal his law”) • sensation magnitude proportional to • (stimulus intensity) raised to a power
so this is the Weber-Fechner law… …but Stevens noticed that not everything went like that! Stevens introduced the idea of “magnitude estimation”
Stevens’ Power Law Perceived magnitude (intensity) h
Response compression Response expansion
power equal to 1 power more than 1 power less than 1 Perceived magnitude (intensity) h Perceived magnitude (intensity) h
Increase in intensity Intensity = constant Ernst Weber (1795-1878)
Perceived magnitude log (intensity) Gustav Fechner (1801-1887)
Perceived magnitude (intensity) h S.S. Stevens (1906-1973)
Somatosensory System section 3
somatosensory • Why? • Perception --- body parts • --- touch • --- special -- vibrissae • antennae • pain • braille • temperature • Protection • Temperature regulation • signals (flushing/muscle arrangement)
somatosensory • How? • Receptors • Neural pathways • Neural codes • (remember those ‘common features’…)
Coding in the somatosensory system • detection • identify modality (Müller's doctrine of specific nerve energies 1826; labelled lines); • identify properties and spatial form • magnitude intensity (APs/sec; frequency coding; population coding; thresholds); • location (absolute, two-point discrimination, topographical coding) • movement
MEISSNER’S CORPUSCLE (RA) MERKEL’S DISK (SA) RUFFINI CORPUSCLE (SA) PACINI CORPUSCLE (very RA) GLABROUS (non-hairy) SKIN
MEISSNER’S CORPUSCLE (RA) MERKEL’S DISK (SA) Free nerve ending HAIRY SKIN RUFFINI ENDING (SA) PACINI CORPUSCLE (very RA) Nerve ending around hair (RA)
SA RA SA RA