1 / 20

Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters

Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters. Orijit Ghoshal orijit.ghoshal@gmail.com Energy Law 2010. Illinois Courts and Smart Meters Presentation Overview. 1. The Commission 2. The Program 3. The Study 4 . The Court 5 . The Future. 1. The Commission Authority.

barry-witt
Download Presentation

Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters Orijit Ghoshal orijit.ghoshal@gmail.com Energy Law 2010

  2. Illinois Courts and Smart MetersPresentation Overview 1. The Commission 2. The Program 3. The Study 4. The Court 5. The Future

  3. 1. The CommissionAuthority “[T]he Commission shall establish the rates or other charges, classifications, contracts, practices, rules or regulations proposed, in whole or in part, or others in lieu thereof, which it shall find to be just and reasonable.” [Public Utilities Act, Section 9-201(c)]

  4. 1. The CommissionProposal • ComEd filed tariffs for $360 Million rate increase • Average consumer bill raised by 8% • ComEd used an 18 month base-year • ComEd proposed a Rider for a “system modernization project” • Pilot program called “Phase 0”

  5. 1. The CommissionOrder • ICC approved “Phase 0” “ComEd is asking for special recovery for these projects that whatever their level, all parties agree – could have long-term economic benefits, but as proposed, ratepayers do not share the economic benefits.” • BUT, ComEd has to come back for further approval

  6. 1. The CommissionFallout Smart Grid Ratings, President of Center for Smart Energy

  7. 2. The ProgramLocation

  8. 2. The ProgramTechnology

  9. 3. The StudyAuthority • Illinois Statewide Smart Grid Collaborative • ICC Order “[T]o develop a strategic plan to guide development of smart grid in Illinois … and to recommend policies that the Commission can consider for adoption.”

  10. 3. The StudyFindings

  11. 3. The StudyFindings

  12. 3. The StudyArguments Arguments in Favor of Rider 1. Smart grid investments strain cash flow and could deny recovery due to regulatory lag. 2. Smart grid investment must compete with other priorities. 3. Utilities face more risk, which could raise cost of capital faced by the utilities. 4. Some smart grid benefits may not flow to utilities. 5. Unless a smart grid investment is needed to provide safe, adequate and reliable service, it may occur more slowly, if at all.

  13. 3. The StudyArguments Arguments in Favor of Rate Case 1. Base rate recovery promotes efficiency may reduce the likelihood of future costs. 2. Routine technology upgrades could be presented as warranting rider treatment. 3. Test year matching of expenses and income is needed to prevent excessive rates. 4. A rider allows excessive earnings and rates until the next general rate case. 5. Smart grid investment does not pass the “big, volatile, and beyond utility control” tests.

  14. 4. The CourtProcedure • ICC Order challenged by ComEd in Commonwealth Edison v. ICC • Attorney General and Citizens’ Utility Board intervened I don’t think so, ComEd!

  15. 4. The CourtAuthority • “Just and reasonable rates” • [Public Utilities Act Section 1-101] • “Prudent and reasonable costs of service” • [Electric Service Customer Choice and Rate Relief Law Section 16-108]

  16. 4. The CourtAnalysis • Riders are approved if • The cost is imposed on the utility • The cost does not affect the utility’s revenue requirement “We conclude that the Commission committed reversible error because Rider SMP is not supported by substantial evidence.”

  17. 4. The CourtReasoning • Expenses not unexpected, volatile, fluctuating • Legislative mandate / ComEd’s decision • Traditional ratemaking

  18. 5. The FutureIllinois • ComEd petitioned for rehearing • Current rate case • Smart Grid Innovation Corridor I got some money… who wants to build a smart grid??

  19. 5. The FutureStakeholders “If the wrong decisions are made in the regulatory arena and the courts for things like this, it really could leave Illinois behind.” – Vice President of Regulatory Policy “The smart grid pilot is going well. We think it’s important, and we wouldn’t want to see it jeopardized.” – Executive Director

  20. 5. The FutureOther States • Maryland • Hawaii • Michigan • California • Texas

More Related