230 likes | 245 Views
This chapter provides a critique of various language teaching methods, including traditional behaviorist methods, rationalist and mentalist methods, functional approaches, and humanistic approaches. It explores the characteristics, applicability, and limitations of each method, as well as the importance of understanding learning styles in language teaching.
E N D
Chapter 2 A Critique of Methods and Approaches in Language Teaching Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Setting the Stage • Two concepts: • Content-based instruction • Teachers provide practice in academic skills and tasks common to mainstream classes • Interactive instruction • Involves active engagement between teacher and student which results in language production and the development of complex thinking skills Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Methodology & Definitions • Methodology – a system of principles, practices, and procedures applied to any specific branch of knowledge • Pedagogy – the art or profession of teaching • Approach – a set of theoretical principles • Method – a procedural plan for presenting and teaching the language • Technique – strategies for implementing the methodological plan Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Learning Styles • A learning style is an approach a learner uses to learn a new language: • Analytical-global • Sensory preferences • Intuitive/Random and Sensory/Sequential Learning • Orientation to closure • Competition-cooperation Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Traditional Behaviorist Methods • Three methods most common to foreign language teaching prior to the 1970’s: • Grammar Translation Method • Direct Method • Audiolingual Method (ALM) Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Traditional Behaviorist Methods • Grammar-translation method • Characteristics: • Outline of grammatical structure/ vocabulary list • Completion of exercises/translation • Conversation about language • Interactive or content-based applicability • None Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Traditional Behaviorist Methods • Direct Method • Characteristics • Students listen to language in large quantities without translation • Grammar rules taught w/ inductive methods • Use of realia, pictures • Interactive or content-based applicability • Discourse, Q&A exchanges with the teacher in target language Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Traditional Behaviorist Methods • Audiolingual Method (ALM) • Characteristics • Emphasis on spoken rather than written lang. • Follows sequence of listening , speaking, reading, and writing • Interactive or content-based applicability • Students learn through stimulus response pattern drills, memorization of dialogues • Teacher always corrects errors Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Rationalist and Mentalist Methods • Cognitive Anti-Method • Characteristics • Controlled by learner rather than teacher • No linguistic, grammatical analysis • No error correction • Interactive or content-based applicability • Students acquire language globally • Students actively engaged in problem solving & critical thinking Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Rationalist and Mentalist Methods • Cognitive-Code Method • Characteristics • Moves from the known to the unknown • Promotes creative use of the language • Understanding of rule system • Learning should be meaningful • Interactive or content-based applicability • Direct association of target language words and phrases with objects and actions Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Functional Approaches • Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA) • Characteristics of Instructional Model: • Topics from major content subjects • Development of academic language skills • Explicit instruction of learning strategies • Interactive or content-based applicability • Content is primary focus of instruction • Academic language skills emerge from content Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Functional Approaches • Total Physical Response (TPR) • Characteristics • Understanding developed through body movement • A listening-speaking approach • Principles of contiguity, frequency, feedback • Interactive or content-based applicability • Students listen and react • Teacher can vary commands according to theme or topic “hold hands” Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Functional Approaches • Total Physical Response Storytelling (TPRS) • Characteristics • Uses storytelling to utilize/expand vocab. • Students hear, see, act out, retell, revise, rewrite • Intensive use of L2; little error correction • Interactive or content-based applicability • High level of interaction • Focus is on communication of content Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Functional Approaches • Natural Approach • Characteristics • Focuses on communicative competence rather than on grammatical perfection • Offers opportunities to acquire rather than learn language • Emphasizes acquisition of vocabulary; modification and improvement of grammar • Interactive or content-based applicability • Due to emphasis on language acquisition Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Humanistic Approaches • Community Language Learning • Characteristics • Teacher has passive role • Cooperative learning community • Low anxiety/free expression • Five learning stages • Interactive or content-based applicability • Independent stage marked by active engagement w/ real-life language • Teacher can direct conversations towards content Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Humanistic Approaches • The Silent Way • Characteristics • Teacher is silent while students speak • Use of color charts, Cuisenaire rods • Learners responsible for what they learn • Interactive or content-based applicability • Limited interactive instructional strategies • Language not used for real-world purposes Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Humanistic Approaches • Suggestopedia • Characteristics • Low-anxiety, relaxed environment • Based on principles of infantilization, pseudopassivity • Interactive or content-based applicability • Limited interactivity between students and teachers as all materials are pedagogically prepared • Not always adaptable to K-12 settings Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
Humanistic Approaches • Rassias Method • Characteristics • Short and intensive • Low anxiety atmosphere w/free expression • Techniques are theatrical, creative and energized • Interactive or content-based applicability • Components of method are interactive and can be content-based Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
What is Language? • Sociocultural Theories • Participants interact through language and other communicative signs to build their sense of being a person, to build knowledge about the world, and their relationships to each other and the world. Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
What is Language? • Sociolinguistics • Focuses on the variety of language used in human social life. • Differences occur across social classes, race, gender, ethnicities, generations and regions. • Language can be studied within a specific speech community or as it occurs in cross-cultural communication Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
What is Language? • Status of the Language Variation: Status of the Speaker • Negative consequences can occur when one uses a stigmatized variety of a language (Ebonics, Chicano English) or a lower status language (Native American) Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
What is Language? • Language as Dynamic & Changing vs. Static and Monolithic • Bilingual education has been viewed as a transitional method to replace L1 • Additive vs. subtractive bilingualism • Additive – no displacement of L1 • Subtractive – L1 replaced by L2; L1 is discouraged Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU
What is Language? • Language is defined not only by its structure, but by its use to symbolize, represent and create knowledge, identify, legitimize and control. Marjorie Hall Haley PhD - GMU