1 / 13

S uper WIMP Dark matter

S uper WIMP Dark matter. in SUSY with a Gravitino LSP. Shufang Su • U. of Arizona. See also, Jonathan Feng’s talk, SuperWIMPs and Slepton Traps. J. Feng, F. Takayama, S. Su hep-ph/0404198, 0404231. ~.  th G    v -1  ( gravitional coupling) -2

bart
Download Presentation

S uper WIMP Dark matter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SuperWIMP Dark matter in SUSY with a Gravitino LSP Shufang Su • U. of Arizona See also, Jonathan Feng’s talk, SuperWIMPs and Slepton Traps J. Feng, F. Takayama, S. Su hep-ph/0404198, 0404231

  2. ~ • thG v-1  (gravitional coupling)-2 • (comparig to WIMP of weak coupling strength) • vtoo small • thG too big, overclose the Universe ~ Why is the gravitino not usually considered as DM? - In supergravity, for mG» GeV – TeV ~ However, gravitino can get relic density by other means SuperWIMP

  3. WIMP  SWIMP + SM particle - FRT hep-ph/0302215, 0306024 WIMP 104 s  t  108 s SWIMP SM Gravitino LSP  LKK graviton 106

  4. Outline - • SWIMP dark matter and gravitino LSP • Constraints • Late time energy injection and BBN • NLSP gravitino +SM particle slepton, sneutrino, neutralino - approach I: fix SWIMP=0.23 - approach II: SWIMP=(mSWIMP/mNLSP) thNLSP • Collider phenomenology • Conclusion Updates since Jan SLAC LC workshop

  5. ~ SWIMP: G (LSP) WIMP: NLSP mG» mNLSP ~ NLSP  G + SM particles SWIMP and SUSY WIMP - • SUSY case ~ Ellis et. al., hep-ph/0312262; Wang and Yang, hep-ph/0405186. 104 s  t  108 s

  6. /10-10 = 6.1 0.4  Dark matter density G· 0.23 ~ Fields, Sarkar, PDG (2002) Constraints - ~ NLSP  G + SM particles - approach I:fix SWIMP=0.23 - approach II:SWIMP=(mSWIMP/mNLSP) thNLSP  CMB photon energy distribution  Big bang nucleosynthesis Late time EM/had injection could change the BBN prediction of light elements abundances

  7. ~ had EM EM (GeV) EM » mNLSP-mG Cyburt, Ellis, Fields and Olive, PRD 67, 103521 (2003) Kawasaki, Kohri and Moroi, astro-ph/0402490 BBN constraints on EM/had injection - • Decay lifetime NLSP • EM/had energy release EM,had=EM,had BrEM,had YNLSP

  8. approach I:fix G = 0.23 ~ NLSP, EM,had=EM,had BEM,had YNLSP  m · 80 » 300 GeV apply CMB and BBN constraints on (NLSP, EM/had)  viable parameter space 200 GeV · m · 400 » 1500 GeV mG¸ 200 GeV ~ YNLSP: approach I - slepton and sneutrino

  9. G = (mG/mNLSP) thNLSP ~ ~ Approach II: sleptonand sneutrino -

  10. Collider Phenomenology - SWIMP Dark Matter • no signals in direct / indirect dark matter searches • SUSY NLSP:rich collider phenomenology NLSP in SWIMP: long lifetime  stable inside the detector • Charged slepton highly ionizing track, almost background free Distinguish from stau NLSP and gravitino LSP in GMSB • GMSB: gravitinom » keVwarm not cold DM • collider searches:other sparticle (mass) • (GMSB) ¿(SWIMP):distinguish experimentally Feng and Smith, in preparation.

  11. Sneutrino and neutralino NLSP vs. ,  0.23  favor gravitino LSP ~ ~ - • sneutrino and neutralino NLSP missing energy signal: energetic jets/leptons + missing energy Is the lightest SM superpartner sneutrino or neutralino? • angular distribution of events (LC) Does it decay into gravitino or not? • sneutrino case: most likely gravitino is LSP • neutralino case: most likely neutralino LSP • direct/indirect dark matter search positive detection  disfavor gravitino LSP • precision determination of SUSY parameter: th, ~ ~

  12. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G G G G G • Decay life time • SM energy distribution  Mpl  mG  SUSY breaking scale ~ NLSP SM NLSP SM SM NLSP Capture particle: Goity, Kossler and Sher, hep-ph/9305244 NLSP SM SM NLSP Supergravity at colliders Buchmuller et. al. hep-ph/0402179 SWIMPs and slepton traps Feng and Smith In preparation… See Feng’s talk

  13. Conclusions - • SuperWIMP is possible candidate for dark matter • SUSY models SWIMP:gravitino LSP WIMP:slepton/sneutrino/neutralino • Constraints from BBN: EM injection and hadronic injection need updated studies of BBN constraints on hadronic/EM injection • Favored mass region • Approach I: fix G=0.23 • Approach II: G = (mG/mNLSP) thNLSP • Rich collider phenomenology(no direct/indirect DM signal) • charged slepton:highly ionizing track • sneutrino/neutralino:missing energy • Other implications … ~ ~ ~

More Related