1 / 8

IAF ID 4:2012 “Market Surveillance Visit” Status report

IAF ID 4:2012 “Market Surveillance Visit” Status report . July 16, 2013. Team members. The Market Surveillance team is made up of the member companies’ participants Boeing - UTAS Bell - Honeywell NASA JAPC - Lockheed Martin Cessna Textron - Parker Triumph Group. Documents.

base
Download Presentation

IAF ID 4:2012 “Market Surveillance Visit” Status report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IAF ID 4:2012 “Market Surveillance Visit” Status report July 16, 2013

  2. Team members • The Market Surveillance team is made up of the member companies’ participants • Boeing - UTAS • Bell - Honeywell • NASA JAPC - Lockheed Martin • Cessna Textron - Parker • Triumph Group

  3. Documents • Working documents • In brief, Self - Assessment, Annex 2 and Annex 3 • Created • Reviewed by team • Released for use

  4. Scheduling • Certification Bodies for Beta Test have been selected • Based on the Boeing risk model • Client selection • Currently in work • 2 clients have been selected • One self assessment is completed • Remaining clients selections are in down-select status by performing organization • Next meeting is scheduled for August 8th, 2013

  5. Conduct Conduct the assessment:

  6. Results Visit Summary (QMS Effectiveness) NOTE: This is NOT a “Conformity assessment” exercise. Results are to be expressed in terms of confidence levels, based on observations and discussions during the visit. 1 = Little or no confidence 2 = Some evidence presented, but not at all convincing 3 = OK - No reason to doubt that this is being addressed correctly 4 = Clear evidence that this is being done, and meets the intent of ISO 9001 5 = We can be proud to use this organization as a benchmark for this topic

  7. Reporting • The assigned Lead OP Assessor is responsible to ensure all annexes are completed. • Completed records will include the IAF ID 4 Annexes: • Annex 2 - “SELF-ASSESSMENT” BY THE CERTIFIED ORGANIZATION • Annex 3 - Example of Visit Summary (QMS Effectiveness) • Any identified client nonconformance shall be documented within the Client’s nonconforming management system.  • Any nonconformance identified as Certification Body (CB) responsibility will be communicated directly with the CB in accordance with AS9104-002 “Oversight” Nonconformities

More Related